Application of computational fluid dynamics in tissue engineering

Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 123-132

  Patrachari, Anirudh R ^a   Podichetty, Jagdeep T ^a   Madihally, Sundararajan V ^a  

^a Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioreactors; Cell growth; Computational fluid dynamics; Glucose; Mesh size; Nutrients; Permeability; Scaffold; Tissue engineering; Transient profile

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTOR DESIGN; CFD ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS; IN-VITRO; MATRIX DEPOSITION; MECHANICAL PARAMETERS; MESH SIZE; NUTRIENT TRANSFER; NUTRIENT TRANSPORT; OXYGEN TENSION; TISSUE GROWTH; TISSUE REGENERATION;

BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; ERROR ANALYSIS; GLUCOSE; GROWTH KINETICS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; NUTRIENTS; SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE; TISSUE CULTURE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

CELL GROWTH; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DIFFUSION; FLUID FLOW; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OXYGEN TENSION; PARAMETERS; POROSITY; REVIEW; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VELOCITY;

BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL GROWTH PROCESSES; HYDRODYNAMICS; OXYGEN; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84863206575     PISSN: 13891723     EISSN: 13474421     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.03.010     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Place E.S., Evans N.D., Stevens M.M. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8:457-470.
2. Langer R., Vacanti J.P. Tissue engineering. Science 1993, 260:920-926.
3. Dermenoudis S., Missirlis Y.F. Bioreactors in tissue engineering. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2010, 12:B592-B608.
4. Martin I., Wendt D., Heberer M. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2004, 22:80-86.
5. Cummings L.J., Waters S.L. Tissue growth in a rotating bioreactor. Part II: fluid flow and nutrient transport problems. Math. Med. Biol. 2007, 24:169-208.
6. Martin Y., Vermette P. Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: design, characterization, and recent advances. Biomaterials 2005, 26:7481-7503.
7. Catapano G., Patzer J.F., Gerlach J.C. Transport advances in disposable bioreactors for liver tissue engineering. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2010, 115:117-143.
8. Cioffi M., Boschetti F., Raimondi M.T., Dubini G. Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: a micro-CT based model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 93:500-510.
9. Hutmacher D.W., Singh H. Computational fluid dynamics for improved bioreactor design and 3D culture. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26:166-172.
10. Porter B., Zauel R., Stockman H., Guldberg R., Fyhrie D. 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:543-549.
11. Wendt D., Riboldi S., Cioffi M., Martin I. Bioreactors in tissue engineering: scientific challenges and clinical perspectives, Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2011, 119:1-27.
12. Milan J.L., Planell J.A., Lacroix D. Computational modelling of the mechanical environment of osteogenesis within a polylactic acid-calcium phosphate glass scaffold. Biomaterials 2009, 30:4219-4226.
13. Lawrence B.J., Devarapalli M., Madihally S.V. Flow dynamics in bioreactors containing tissue engineering scaffolds. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102:935-947.
14. Podichetty J.T., Dhane D.V., Madihally S.V. Dynamics of diffusivity and pressure drop in flow-through and parallel-flow bioreactors during tissue regeneration biotechnology progress. Biotechnol. Prog. 2012, 10.1002/btpr.1547.
15. Pok, S., Dhane, D. V., and Madihally, S. V.: Computational simulation modelling of bioreactor configurations for regenerating human bladder. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., (available online 6 January 2012). doi:10.1080/10255842.2011.641177.
16. Toh Y.-C., Zhang C., Zhang J., Khong Y.M., Chang S., Samper V.D., van Noort D., Hutmacher D.W., Yu H. A novel 3D mammalian cell perfusion-culture system in microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 2007, 7:302-309.
17. Sucosky P., Osorio D.F., Brown J.B., Neitzel G.P. Fluid mechanics of a spinner-flask bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 85:34-46.
18. Raimondi M.T., Boschetti F., Falcone L., Migliavacca F., Remuzzi A., Dubini G. The effect of media perfusion on three-dimensional cultures of human chondrocytes: integration of experimental and computational approaches. Biorheology 2004, 41:401-410.
19. Azuaje F. Computational discrete models of tissue growth and regeneration. Brief. Bioinform. 2011, 12:64-77.
20. Maes F., Van Ransbeeck P., Van Oosterwyck H., Verdonck P. Modeling fluid flow through irregular scaffolds for perfusion bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:621-630.
21. Gomes M.E., Bossano C.M., Johnston C.M., Reis R.L., Mikos A.G. In vitro localization of bone growth factors in constructs of biodegradable scaffolds seeded with marrow stromal cells and cultured in a flow perfusion bioreactor. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12:177-188.
22. Sikavitsas V.I., Bancroft G.N., Holtorf H.L., Jansen J.A., Mikos A.G. Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:14683-14688.
23. Bancroft G.N., Sikavitsas V.I., van den Dolder J., Sheffield T.L., Ambrose C.G., Jansen J.A., Mikos A.G. Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:12600-12605.
24. Kim S.S., Sundback C.A., Kaihara S., Benvenuto M.S., Kim B.-S., Mooney D.J., Vacanti.J.P. Dynamic seeding and in vitro culture of hepatocytes in a flow perfusion system. Tissue Eng. 2000, 6:39-44.
25. Lappa M. Organic tissues in rotating bioreactors: fluid-mechanical aspects, dynamic growth models, and morphological evolution. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84:518-532.
26. Williams K.A., Saini S., Wick T.M. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of steady-state momentum and mass transport in a bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Prog. 2002, 18:951-963.
27. Yeatts A.B., Fisher J.P. Bone tissue engineering bioreactors: dynamic culture and the influence of shear stress. Bone 2011, 48:171-181.
28. Kelly W.J. Using computational fluid dynamics to characterize and improve bioreactor performance. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2008, 49:225-238.
29. Peng C.A., Palsson B.O. Cell growth and differentiation on feeder layers is predicted to be influenced by bioreactor geometry. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1996, 50:479-492.
30. Frangos J.A., Eskin S.G., McIntire L.V., Ives C.L. Flow effects on prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 1985, 227:1477-1479.
31. Davies P.F., Barbee K.A., Volin M.V., Robotewskyj A., Chen J., Joseph L., Griem M.L., Wernick M.N., Jacobs E., Polacek D.C., dePaola N., Barakat A.I. Spatial relationships in early signaling events of flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 1997, 59:527-549.
32. Malone A.M., Anderson C.T., Tummala P., Kwon R.Y., Johnston T.R., Stearns T., Jacobs C.R. Primary cilia mediate mechanosensing in bone cells by a calcium-independent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:13325-13330.
33. Capuani F., Frenkel D., Lowe C.P. Velocity fluctuations and dispersion in a simple porous medium. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2003, 67:056306.
34. Stephens J.S., Cooper J.A., Phelan F.R., Dunkers J.P. Perfusion flow bioreactor for 3D in situ imaging: investigating cell/biomaterials interactions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97:952-961.
35. Raimondi M.T., Moretti M., Cioffi M., Giordano C., Boschetti F., Lagana K., Pietrabissa R. The effect of hydrodynamic shear on 3D engineered chondrocyte systems subject to direct perfusion. Biorheology 2006, 43:215-222.
36. Chung C.A., Chen C.W., Chen C.P., Tseng C.S. Enhancement of cell growth in tissue-engineering constructs under direct perfusion: modeling and simulation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97:1603-1616.
37. Macario D.K., Entersz I., Abboud J.P., Nackman G.B. Inhibition of apoptosis prevents shear-induced detachment of endothelial cells. J. Surg. Res. 2008, 147:282-289.
38. Shito M., Kim N.H., Baskaran H., Tilles A.W., Tompkins R.G., Yarmush M.L., Toner M. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of albumin synthesis rate of porcine hepatocytes in a flat-plate bioreactor. Artif. Organs 2001, 25:571-578.
39. Huang Y., Onyeri S., Siewe M., Moshfeghian A., Madihally S.V. In vitro characterization of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005, 26:7616-7627.
40. Hong J.K., Madihally S.V. Next generation of electrosprayed fibers for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2011, 17:125-142.
41. Karageorgiou V., Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005, 26:5474-5491.
42. Hollister S.J., Lin C.Y., Saito E., Schek R.D., Taboas J.M., Williams J.M., Partee B., Flanagan C.L., Diggs A., Wilke E.N., other 6 authors Engineering craniofacial scaffolds. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2005, 8:162-173.
43. Hulbert S.F., Young F.A., Mathews R.S., Klawitter J.J., Talbert C.D., Stelling F.H. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1970, 4:433-456.
44. Yannas I.V., Lee E., Orgill D.P., Skrabut E.M., Murphy G.F. Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86:933-937.
45. Truskey G.A., Yuan F., Katz D.F. Transport phenomena in biological systems 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 317-321.
46. Elder B.D., Athanasiou K.A. Hydrostatic pressure in articular cartilage tissue engineering: from chondrocytes to tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2009, 15:43-53.
47. Kim B.S., Mooney D.J. Scaffolds for engineering smooth muscle under cyclic mechanical strain conditions. J. Biomech. Eng. 2000, 122:210-215.
48. Isenberg B.C., Tranquillo R.T. Long-term cyclic distention enhances the mechanical properties of collagen-based media-equivalents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2003, 31:937-949.
49. Jeong S.I., Kwon J.H., Lim J.I., Cho S.-W., Jung Y., Sung W.J., Kim S.H., Kim Y.H., Lee Y.M., Kim B.-S., Choi C.Y., Kim S.-J. Mechano-active tissue engineering of vascular smooth muscle using pulsatile perfusion bioreactors and elastic PLCL scaffolds. Biomaterials 2005, 26:1405-1411.
50. Dong J., Uemura T., Kojima H., Kikuchi M., Tanaka J., Tateishi T. Application of low-pressure system to sustain in vivo bone formation in osteoblast/porous hydroxyapatite composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2001, 17:37-43.
51. Trummer E., Fauland K., Seidinger S., Schriebl K., Lattenmayer C., Kunert R., Vorauer-Uhl K., Weik R., Borth N., Katinger H., Müller D. Process parameter shifting: part I. Effect of DOT, pH, and temperature on the performance of Epo-Fc expressing CHO cells cultivated in controlled batch bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 94:1033-1044.
52. Andersen D.C., Bridges T., Gawlitzek M., Hoy C. Multiple cell culture factors can affect the glycosylation of Asn-184 in CHO-produced tissue-type plasminogen activator. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 70:25-31.
53. Borys M.C., Linzer D.I.H., Papoutsakis E.T. Culture pH affects expression rates and glycosylation of recombinant mouse placental lactogen proteins by Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 1993, 11:720-724.
54. Bloemkolk J.-W., Gray M.R., Merchant F., Mosmann T.R. Effect of temperature on hybridoma cell cycle and MAb production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 40:427-431.
55. Fox S.R., Patel U.A., Yap M.G.S., Wang D.I.C. Maximizing interferon-γ production by Chinese hamster ovary cells through temperature shift optimization: experimental and modeling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 85:177-184.
56. Link T., Bäckström M., Graham R., Essers R., Zörner K., Gätgens J., Burchell J., Taylor-Papadimitriou J., Hansson G.C., Noll T. Bioprocess development for the production of a recombinant MUC1 fusion protein expressed by CHO-K1 cells in protein-free medium. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 110:51-62.
57. Rodriguez J., Spearman M., Huzel N., Butler M. Enhanced production of monomeric interferon-β by CHO cells through the control of culture conditions. Biotechnol. Prog. 2005, 21:22-30.
58. Kurano N., Leist C., Messi F., Kurano S., Fiechter A. Growth behavior of Chinese hamster ovary cells in a compact loop bioreactor: 1. Effects of physical and chemical environments. J. Biotechnol. 1990, 15:101-111.
59. Yoon S.K., Choi S.L., Song J.Y., Lee G.M. Effect of culture pH on erythropoietin production by Chinese hamster ovary cells grown in suspension at 32.5 and 37.0 °C. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89:345-356.
60. Yoon S., Ahn Y.-H., Jeong M. Effect of culture temperature on follicle-stimulating hormone production by Chinese hamster ovary cells in a perfusion bioreactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76:83-89.
61. Furukawa K., Ohsuye K. Effect of culture temperature on a recombinant CHO cell line producing a C-terminal α-amidating enzyme. Cytotechnology 1998, 26:153-164.
62. Yoon S.K., Song J.Y., Lee G.M. Effect of low culture temperature on specific productivity, transcription level, and heterogeneity of erythropoietin in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82:289-298.
63. Nishida K., Yamato M., Hayashida Y., Watanabe K., Yamamoto K., Adachi E., Nagai S., Kikuchi A., Maeda N., Watanabe H., Okano T., Tano Y. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. New Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351:1187-1196.
64. Yu X., Botchwey E.A., Levine E.M., Pollack S.R., Laurencin C.T. Bioreactor-based bone tissue engineering: the influence of dynamic flow on osteoblast phenotypic expression and matrix mineralization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:11203-11208.
65. Datta N., Pham Q.P., Sharma U., Sikavitsas V.I., Jansen J.A., Mikos A.G. In vitro generated extracellular matrix and fluid shear stress synergistically enhance 3D osteoblastic differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:2488-2493.
66. King J.A., Miller W.M. Bioreactor development for stem cell expansion and controlled differentiation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007, 11:394-398.
67. Pierre J., Oddou C. Engineered bone culture in a perfusion bioreactor: a 2D computational study of stationary mass and momentum transport. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 10:429-438.
68. Malda J., Rouwkema J., Martens D.E., Le Comte E.P., Kooy F.K., Tramper J., van Blitterswijk C.A., Riesle J. Oxygen gradients in tissue-engineered PEGT/PBT cartilaginous constructs: measurement and modeling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 86:9-18.
69. Mackie J.S., Meares P. Diffusion in a cation exchanger resin I. Proc. R. Soc. 1955, 232(A):448-495.
70. Mackie J.S., Meares P. Diffusion in a cation exchanger resin II. Proc. R. Soc. 1955, 232(A):495-505.
71. Lai C.Z., Koseoglu S.S., Lugert E.C., Boswell P.G., Rabai J., Lodge T.P., Buhlmann P. Fluorous polymeric membranes for ionophore-based ion-selective potentiometry: how inert is Teflon AF?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131:1598-1606.
72. Wood B.D., Quintard M., Whitaker S. Calculation of effective diffusivities for biofilms and tissues. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 77:495-516.
73. Haselgrove J.C., Shapiro I.M., Silverton S.F. Computer modeling of the oxygen supply and demand of cells of the avian growth cartilage. Am. J. Physiol. 1993, 265(2 Pt 1):C497-C506.
74. Flaibani M., Magrofuoco E., Elvassore N. Computational modeling of cell growth heterogeneity in a perfused 3D scaffold. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:859-869.
75. Cheng G., Youssef B.B., Markenscoff P., Zygourakis K. Cell population dynamics modulate the rates of tissue growth processes. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:713-724.
76. Galbusera F., Cioffi M., Raimondi M.T., Pietrabissa R. Computational modeling of combined cell population dynamics and oxygen transport in engineered tissue subject to interstitial perfusion. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 10:279-287.
77. Gerontas S., Farid S.S., Hoare M. Windows of operation for bioreactor design for the controlled formation of tissue-engineered arteries. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25:842-853.
78. Liu D., Chua C.K., Leong K.F. A mathematical model for fluid shear-sensitive 3D tissue construct development. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 2012, 10.1007/s10237-012-0378-7.
79. Galban C.J., Locke B.R. Analysis of cell growth kinetics and substrate diffusion in a polymer scaffold. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 65:121-132.
80. Devarapalli M., Lawrence B.J., Madihally S.V. Modeling nutrient consumptions in large flow-through bioreactors for tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:1003-1015.
81. Iyer P., Walker K.J., Madihally S.V. Increased matrix synthesis by fibroblasts with decreased proliferation on synthetic chitosan-gelatin porous structures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109:1314-1325.
82. Lo C.M., Wang H.B., Dembo M., Wang Y.L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 2000, 79:144-152.
83. Jeong D., Yun A., Kim J. Mathematical model and numerical simulation of the cell growth in scaffolds. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 2012, 11:677-688.
84. Grayson W.L., Marolt D., Bhumiratana S., Frohlich M., Guo X.E., Vunjak-Novakovic G. Optimizing the medium perfusion rate in bone tissue engineering bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:1159-1170.
85. Bilgen B., Barabino G.A. Location of scaffolds in bioreactors modulates the hydrodynamic environment experienced by engineered tissues. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 98:282-294.
86. Grayson W.L., Frohlich M., Yeager K., Bhumiratana S., Chan M.E., Cannizzaro C., Wan L.Q., Liu X.S., Guo X.E., Vunjak-Novakovic G. Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:3299-3304.
87. McCoy R.J., O'Brien F.J. Influence of shear stress in perfusion bioreactor cultures for the development of three-dimensional bone tissue constructs: a review. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2010, 16:587-601.
88. Khayyeri H., Checa S., Tagil M., O'Brien F.J., Prendergast P.J. Tissue differentiation in an in vivo bioreactor: in silico investigations of scaffold stiffness. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010, 21:2331-2336.