Perfusion flow bioreactor for 3D in situ imaging: Investigating cell/biomaterials interactions

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 952-961

  Stephens, J S ^a   Cooper, J A ^a   Phelan Jr , F R ^a   Dunkers, J P ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Imaging; Perfusion flow; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

PERFUSION FLOW; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) CULTURE ENVIRONMENT; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLDS;

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMIMETICS; BIOREACTORS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SCAFFOLDS; SHEAR STRESS;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOW RATE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PH MEASUREMENT; SHEAR STRESS; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CLONE CELLS; CULTURE MEDIA; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MICE; OSTEOBLASTS; PERFUSION; POLYESTERS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 34447320732     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21252     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Altman GH, Horan RL, Martin I, Farhadi J, Stark PRH, Volloch V, Richmond JC, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL. 2002. Cell differentiation by mechanical stress. FASEB J 16:270-272.
2. Bancroft GN, Sikavitsast VI, van den Dolder J, Sheffield TL, Ambrose CG, Jansen JA, Mikos AG. 2002. Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12600-12605.
3. Bancroft GN, Sikavitsas VI, Mikos AG. 2003. Design of a flow perfusion bioreactor system for bone tissue-engineering applications. Tissue Eng 9:549-554.
4. Beckman M. 2003. Play-by-play imaging rewrites cells' rules. Science 300: 76-77.
5. Botchwey EA, Pollack SR, Levine EM, Laurencin CT. 2001. Bone tissue engineering in a rotating bioreactor using a microcarrier matrix system. J Biomed Mater Res 55:242-253.
6. Botchwey EA, Dupree MA, Pollack SR, Levine EM, Laurencin CT. 2003. Tissue engineered bone: Measurement of nutrient transport in three-dimensional matrices. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 67A:357-367.
7. Cartmell SH, Porter BD, Garcia AJ, Guldberg RE. 2003. Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded three-dimensional bone constructs in vitro. Tissue Eng 9:1197-1203.
8. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. 2001. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294:1708-1712.
9. Czirok A, Rupp PA, Rongish BJ, Little CD. 2002. Multi-field 3D scanning light microscopy of early avian embryogenesis at cellular resolution. Mol Biol Cell 13:551A.
10. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. 1999. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 20:573-588.
11. Focht DC. 1996. Live-cell microscopy: Environmental control for mammalian specimens. Nat Biotechnol 14:361-362.
12. Goldstein AS, Juarez TM, Helmke CD, Gustin MC, Mikos AG. 2001. Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. Biomaterials 22:1279-1288.
13. Gomes ME, Sikavitsas VI, Behravesh E, Reis RL, Mikos AG. 2003. Effect of flow perfusion on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells cultured on starch-based three-dimensional scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 67A:87-95.
14. Griffith LG. 2000. Polymeric biomaterials. Acta Materialia 48:263-277.
15. Griffith LG. 2002. Emerging design principles in Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Reparative Med Growing Tissues Organs 961: 83-95.
16. Griffith LG, Naughton G. 2002. Tissue engineering - Current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science 295:1009-+.
17. Heilshorn SC, Liu JC, Tirrell DA. 2005. Cell-binding domain context affects cell behavior on engineered proteins. Biomacromolecules 6:318-323.
18. Hench LL, Polak JM. 2002. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295:1014.
19. Hing WA, Poole CA, Jensen CG, Watson M. 2000. An integrated environmental perfusion chamber and heating system for long-term, high resolution imaging of living cells. J Microsc Oxf 199:90-95.
20. Hoerstrup SP, Sodian R, Sperling JS, Vacanti JP, Mayer JE. 2000. New pulsatile bioreactor for in vitro formation of tissue engineered heart valves. Tissue Eng 6:75-79.
21. Hollister SJ. 2005. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Mater 4:518-524.
22. Holmes TC. 2002. Novel peptide-based biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 20:16-21.
23. Janssen FW, Oostra J, van Oorschot A, van Blitterswijk CA. 2006. A perfusion bioreactor system capable of producing clinically relevant volumes of tissue-engineered bone: In vivo bone formation showing proof of concept. Biomaterials 27:315-323.
24. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. 2005. Porosity of 3D biornaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474-5491.
25. Koegler WS, Griffith LG. 2004. Osteoblast response to PLGA tissue engineering scaffolds with PEO modified surface chemistries and demonstration of patterned cell response. Biomaterials 25:2819-2830.
26. Landis FA, Stephens JS, Cooper J, Cicerone MT, Lin-Gibson S. 2006. Tissue engineering scaffolds based on photocured dimethacrylate polymers for the in vitro optical imaging of cellular activity. Biomacromolecules 7: 1751-1757.
27. Langer R, Tirrell DA. 2004. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 428:487-492.
28. Langer R, Vacanti JP. 1993. Tissue engineering. Science 260:920-926.
29. Lauffenburger DA, Griffith LG. 2001. Who's got pull around here? Cell organization in development and tissue engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4282-4284.
30. Laurencin CT, Ambrosio AMA, Borden MD, Cooper JA. 1999. Tissue engineering: Orthopedic applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1:19-46.
31. Lichtenberg A, Dumlu G, Walles T, Maringka M, Ringes-Lichtenberg S, Ruhparwar A, Mertsching H, Haverich A. 2005. A multifunctional bioreactor for three-dimensional cell (co)-culture. Biomaterials 26: 555-562.
32. Liebschner MAK. 2004. Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone. Biomaterials 25:1697-1714.
33. Lu LC, Mikos AG. 1996. The importance of new processing techniques in tissue engineering. MRS Bulletin 21:28-32.
34. Martin Y, Vermette P. 2005. Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: Design, characterization, and recent advances. Biomaterials 26:7481-7503.
35. Meredith JC, Sormana JL, Keselowsky BG, Garcia AJ, Tona A, Karim A, Amis EJ. 2003. Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 66A:483-490.
36. Minuth WW, Schumacher K, Strehl R, Kloth S. 2000. Physiological and cell biological aspects of perfusion culture technique employed to generate differentiated tissues for long term biomaterial testing and tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 11:495-522.
37. Pathi P, Ma T, Locke BR. 2005. Role of nutrient supply on cell growth in bioreactor design for tissue engineering of hematopoietic cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:743-758.
38. Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D. 2005. 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech 38:543-549.
39. Powers MJ, Domansky K, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Kalezi A, Capitano A, Upadhyaya A, Kurzawski P, Wack KE, Stolz DB, Kamm R, Griffith LG. 2002. A microfabricated array bioreactor for perfused 3D liver culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 78:257-269.
40. Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG. 2003. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24:4353-4364.
41. Sikavitsas VI, Temenoff JS, Mikos AG. 2001. Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. Biomaterials 22:2581-2593.
42. Sikavitsas VI, Bancroft GN, Lemoine JJ, Liebschner MAK, Dauner M, Mikos AG. 2005. Flow perfusion enhances the calcified matrix deposition of marrow stromal cells in biodegradable nonwoven fiber mesh scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng 33:63-70.
43. Simon CG, Eidelman N, Kennedy SB, Sehgal A, Khatri CA, Washburn NR. 2005. Combinatorial screening of cell proliferation on poly(D, L-lactic acid)/poly(D, L-lactic acid) blends. Biomaterials 26:6906-6915.
44. Stephens DJ, Allan VJ. 2003. Light microscopy techniques for live cell imaging. Science 300:82-86.
45. Stevens MM, George JH. 2005. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310:1135-1138.
46. Thomas C, De Vries P, Hardin J, White J. 1996. Four-dimensional imaging: Computer visualization of 3D movements in living specimens. Science 273:603.
47. Vance J, Galley S, Liu DF, Donahue SW. 2005. Mechanical stimulation of MC3T3 osteoblastic cells in a bone tissue-engineering bioreactor enhances prostaglandin E-2 release. Tissue Eng 11:1832-1839.
48. Wang Y, Uemura T, Dong J, Kojima H, Tateishi T. 2002. Perfusion culture system improves osteogenesis of rat bone marrow derived osteoblastic cells in porous ceramic materials. J Bone Miner Res 17: S338.
49. Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ. 2004. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: Influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 25:1215-1224.
50. Weinbaum S, Cowin SC, Zeng Y. 1994. A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses. J Biomech 27:339-360.
51. Williams C, Wick TM. 2004. Perfusion bioreactor for small diameter tissue-engineered arteries. Tissue Eng 10:930-941.
52. Yu XJ, Botchwey EA, Levine EM, Pollack SR, Laurencin CT. 2004. Bioreactor-based bone tissue engineering: The influence of dynamic flow on osteoblast phenotypic expression and matrix mineralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11203-11208.
53. Zeltinger J, Sherwood JK, Graham DA, Mueller R, Griffith LG. 2001. Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng 7:557-572.