Dynamics of diffusivity and pressure drop in flow-through and parallel-flow bioreactors during tissue regeneration

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1045-1054

  Podichetty, Jagdeep T ^a   Dhane, Dhananjay V ^a   Madihally, Sundararajan V ^a  

^a Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

3D scaffold; Bioreactor design; Chitosan; Diffusivity; Gelatin; Porosity

Indexed keywords

3D SCAFFOLDS; ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS; BIOREACTOR DESIGN; CELL DENSITY; CHANNEL POSITION; CHITOSAN-GELATIN SCAFFOLDS; EFFECTIVE DIFFUSIVITIES; FLOWTHROUGH; GELATIN; HOLD UP; LOW POROSITY; LOWER PRESSURES; NEW DESIGN; NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTIONS; SCAFFOLD THICKNESS; SIMULATION STUDIES; SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS; TISSUE REGENERATION; TRANSPORT CHARACTERISTICS;

BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; CHITOSAN; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DIFFUSION; FLOW RATE; GLUCOSE; INLET FLOW; NUTRIENTS; PECLET NUMBER; POROSITY; PRESSURE DROP; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE;

PARALLEL FLOW;

CHITOSAN; GELATIN; GLUCOSE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CELL COUNT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; HYDRODYNAMICS; INSTRUMENTATION; KINETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PRESSURE; RAT; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; BIOREACTORS; CELL COUNT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHITOSAN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GELATIN; GLUCOSE; HYDRODYNAMICS; KINETICS; MYOCYTES, SMOOTH MUSCLE; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; PRESSURE; RATS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84864833474     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1547     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Frangos JA, Eskin SG, McIntire LV, Ives CL. Flow effects on prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells. Science. 1985; 227: 1477-1479.
2. Davies PF, Barbee KA, Volin MV, Robotewskyj A, Chen J, Joseph L, Griem ML, Wernick MN, Jacobs E, Polacek DC, dePaola N, Barakat AI. Spatial relationships in early signaling events of flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997; 59: 527-549.
3. Malone AM, Anderson CT, Tummala P, Kwon RY, Johnston TR, Stearns T, Jacobs CR. Primary cilia mediate mechanosensing in bone cells by a calcium-independent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104: 13325-13330.
4. King JA, Miller WM. Bioreactor development for stem cell expansion and controlled differentiation. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007; 11: 394-398.
5. Gemmiti CV, Guldberg RE. Fluid flow increases type II collagen deposition and tensile mechanical properties in bioreactor-grown tissue-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. 2006; 12: 469-479.
6. Zhao F, Pathi P, Grayson W, Xing Q, Locke BR, Ma T. Effects of oxygen transport on 3-d human mesenchymal stem cell metabolic activity in perfusion and static cultures: experiments and mathematical model. Biotechnol Prog. 2005; 21: 1269-1280.
7. Tarng Y-W, Huang B-F, Su F-C. A novel recirculating flow-perfusion bioreactor for periosteal chondrogenesis. Int Orthop. 2012;36:863-868.
8. Wendt D, Marsano A, Jakob M, Heberer M, Martin I. Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three-dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003; 84: 205-214.
9. Goldstein AS, Juarez TM, Helmke CD, Gustin MC, Mikos AG. Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2001; 22: 1279-1288.
10. Yu X, Botchwey EA, Levine EM, Pollack SR, Laurencin CT. Bioreactor-based bone tissue engineering: the influence of dynamic flow on osteoblast phenotypic expression and matrix mineralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 11203-11208.
11. Datta N, Pham QP, Sharma U, Sikavitsas VI, Jansen JA, Mikos AG. In vitro generated extracellular matrix and fluid shear stress synergistically enhance 3D osteoblastic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103: 2488-2493.
12. Cioffi M, Boschetti F, Raimondi MT, Dubini G. Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: a micro-CT based model. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006; 93: 500-510.
13. Hutmacher DW, Singh H. Computational fluid dynamics for improved bioreactor design and 3D culture. Trends Biotechnol. 2008; 26: 166-172.
14. Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D. 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech. 2005; 38: 543-549.
15. Brown A, Meenan BJ. Investigating the effects of fluid shear forces on cellular responses to profiled surfaces in-vitro: a computational and experimental investigation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2007: 5387-5390.
16. Sander EA, Nauman EA. Permeability of musculoskeletal tissues and scaffolding materials: experimental results and theoretical predictions. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2003; 31: 1-26.
17. Gresch M, Brugger R, Meyer A, Gujer W. Compartmental models for continuous flow reactors derived from CFD simulations. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43: 2381-2387.
18. Williams KA, Saini S, Wick TM. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of steady-state momentum and mass transport in a bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol Prog. 2002; 18: 951-963.
19. Devarapalli M, Lawrence BJ, Madihally SV. Modeling nutrient consumptions in large flow-through bioreactors for tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009; 103: 1003-1015.
20. Lawrence BJ, Devarapalli M, Madihally SV. Flow dynamics in bioreactors containing tissue engineering scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009; 102: 935-947.
21. Chung CA, Chen CW, Chen CP, Tseng CS. Enhancement of cell growth in tissue-engineering constructs under direct perfusion: modeling and simulation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007; 97: 1603-1616.
22. Wendt D, Riboldi S, Cioffi M, Martin I. Bioreactors in Tissue Engineering: Scientific Challenges and Clinical Perspectives. Berlin: Springer; 2011: 1-27.
23. Succi S, Benzi R, Higuera F. The Lattice Boltzmann-equation-a new tool for computational fluid-dynamics. Physica D. 1991; 47: 219-230.
24. Pok S, Dhane DV, Madihally SV. Computational simulation modelling of bioreactor configurations for regenerating human bladder. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. In press. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.641177.
25. Raghavan D, Kropp BP, Lin HK, Zhang Y, Cowan R, Madihally SV. Physical characteristics of small intestinal submucosa scaffolds are location-dependent. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005; 73: 90-96.
26. Truskey GA, Yuan F, Katz DF. Transport Phenomena in Biological Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004: 317-321.
27. Motterlini R, Kerger H, Green CJ, Winslow RM, Intaglietta M. Depression of endothelial and smooth muscle cell oxygen consumption by endotoxin. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1998; 275: H776-H782.
28. Alpert E, Gruzman A, Totary H, Kaiser N, Reich R, Sasson S. A natural protective mechanism against hyperglycaemia in vascular endothelial and smooth-muscle cells: role of glucose and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid. Biochem J. 2002; 362: 413-422.
29. Mackie JS, Meares P. Diffusion in a cation exchanger resin II. Proc R Soc. 1955; 232: 495-505.
30. Sengers BG, van Donkelaar CC, Oomens CW, Baaijens FP. Computational study of culture conditions and nutrient supply in cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol Prog. 2005; 21: 1252-1261.
31. Huang Y, Onyeri S, Siewe M, Moshfeghian A, Madihally SV. In vitro characterization of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 7616-7627.
32. Huang Y, Siewe M, Madihally SV. Effect of spatial architecture on cellular colonization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006; 93: 64-75.
33. Iyer P, Walker KJ, Madihally SV. Increased matrix synthesis by fibroblasts with decreased proliferation on synthetic chitosan-gelatin porous structures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012; 109: 1314-1325.
34. Patrachari AR, Podichetty JT, Madihally SV. Application of computational fluid dynamics in tissue engineering. J Biosci Bioeng. In press.
35. Zhao F, Ma T. Perfusion bioreactor system for human mesenchymal stem cell tissue engineering: dynamic cell seeding and construct development. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005; 91: 482-493.
36. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2000: 10.
37. Falchuk KH, Goetzl EJ, Kulka JP. Respiratory gases of synovial fluids. An approach to synovial tissue circulatory-metabolic imbalance in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Med. 1970; 49: 223-231.
38. Steinbrech DS, Longaker MT, Mehrara BJ, Saadeh PB, Chin GS, Gerrets RP, Chau DC, Rowe NM, Gittes GK. Fibroblast response to hypoxia: the relationship between angiogenesis and matrix regulation. J Surg Res. 1999; 84: 127-133.
39. Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ. Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia: role of the HIF system. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 677-684.
40. Mylotte LA, Duffy AM, Murphy M, O'Brien T, Samali A, Barry F, Szegezdi E. Metabolic flexibility permits mesenchymal stem cell survival in an ischemic environment. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 1325-1336.
41. Siepe M, Akhyari P, Lichtenberg A, Schlensak C, Beyersdorf F. Stem cells used for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2008; 34: 242-247.
42. Andrews PW, Benvenisty N. Starting from building blocks: tissue engineering using stem cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005; 16: 485-486.
43. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 653-660.