The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 80-86

  Martin, Ivan ^a   Wendt, David ^a   Heberer, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BIOREACTORS; CELLS; COSTS;

FUNCTIONAL TISSUES;

TISSUE;

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; VACCINE;

BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; MEDICINE;

AUTOMATION; BIOREACTOR; CELL FUNCTION; COST; DEVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EX VIVO STUDY; FERMENTATION; FOOD PROCESSING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE GRAFT; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 1642563967     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.12.001     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Langer R., Vacanti J.P. Tissue engineering. Science. 260:1993;920-926.
2. Butler D.L., et al. Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:2000;570-575.
3. Mazariegos G.V., et al. First clinical use of a novel bioartificial liver support system (BLSS). Am. J. Transplant. 2:2002;260-266.
4. Griffith L.G., Naughton G. Tissue engineering - current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science. 295:2002;1009-1014.
5. Cukierman E., et al. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science. 294:2001;1708-1712.
6. Vunjak-Novakovic G., et al. Dynamic cell seeding of polymer scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Prog. 14:1998;193-202.
7. Freed L.E., et al. Tissue engineering of cartilage in space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1997;13885-13890.
8. Holy C.E., et al. Engineering three-dimensional bone tissue in vitro using biodegradable scaffolds: investigating initial cell-seeding density and culture period. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51:2000;376-382.
9. Carrier R.L., et al. Cardiac tissue engineering: cell seeding, cultivation parameters, and tissue construct characterization. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 64:1999;580-589.
10. Freed L.E., et al. Chondrogenesis in a cell-polymer bioreactor system. Exp. Cell Res. 240:1998;58-65.
11. Ishaug-Riley S.L., et al. Three-dimensional culture of rat calvarial osteoblasts in porous biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials. 19:1998;1405-1412.
12. Kim B.S., et al. Optimizing seeding and culture methods to engineer smooth muscle tissue on biodegradable polymer matrices. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 57:1998;46-54.
13. Bruinink A., et al. The stiffness of bone marrow cell-knit composites is increased during mechanical load. Biomaterials. 22:2001;3169-3178.
14. Li Y., et al. Effects of filtration seeding on cell density, spatial distribution, and proliferation in nonwoven fibrous matrices. Biotechnol. Prog. 17:2001;935-944.
15. Xiao Y.L., et al. Static and dynamic fibroblast seeding and cultivation in porous PEO/PBT scaffolds. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 10:1999;773-777.
16. Burg K.J., et al. Application of magnetic resonance microscopy to tissue engineering: a polylactide model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 61:2002;380-390.
17. Glicklis R., et al. Hepatocyte behavior within three-dimensional porous alginate scaffolds. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 67:2000;344-353.
18. Nehrer S., et al. Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes. Biomaterials. 18:1997;769-776.
19. Vunjak-Novakovic G., et al. Effects of mixing on the composition and morphology of tissue-engineered cartilage. AIChE J. 42:1996;850-860.
20. Wendt D., et al. Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three-dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 84:2003;205-214.
21. Xie Y., et al. Three-dimensional cell-scaffold constructs promote efficient gene transfection: implications for cell-based gene therapy. Tissue Eng. 7:2001;585-598.
22. Sodian R., et al. Tissue-engineering bioreactors: a new combined cell-seeding and perfusion system for vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 8:2002;863-870.
23. Davisson T., et al. Perfusion increases cell content and matrix synthesis in chondrocyte three-dimensional cultures. Tissue Eng. 8:2002;807-816.
24. Radisic M., et al. High-density seeding of myocyte cells for cardiac tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82:2003;403-414.
25. Kim S.S., et al. Dynamic seeding and in vitro culture of hepatocytes in a flow perfusion system. Tissue Eng. 6:2000;39-44.
26. Sutherland R.M., et al. Oxygenation and differentiation in multicellular spheroids of human colon carcinoma. Cancer Res. 46:1986;5320-5329.
27. Martin I., et al. Method for quantitative analysis of glycosaminoglycan distribution in cultured natural and engineered cartilage. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27:1999;656-662.
28. Ishaug S.L., et al. Bone formation by three-dimensional stromal osteoblast culture in biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 36:1997;17-28.
29. Gooch K.J., et al. Effects of mixing intensity on tissue-engineered cartilage. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 72:2001;402-407.
30. Vunjak-Novalovic G., et al. Bioreactor cultivation conditions modulate the composition and mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 17:1999;130-138.
31. Rhee H.W., et al. Permanent phenotypic and genotypic changes of prostate cancer cells cultured in a three-dimensional rotating-wall vessel. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 37:2001;127-140.
32. Licato L.L., et al. A novel preclinical model of human malignant melanoma utilizing bioreactor rotating-wall vessels. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 37:2001;121-126.
33. Pei M., et al. Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds. FASEB J. 16:2002;1691-1694.
34. Unsworth B.R., Lelkes P.I. Growing tissues in microgravity. Nat. Med. 4:1998;901-907.
35. Obradovic B., et al. Integration of engineered cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 19:2001;1089-1097.
36. Bancroft G.N., et al. Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;12600-12605.
37. Goldstein A.S., et al. Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. Biomaterials. 22:2001;1279-1288.
38. Navarro F.A., et al. Perfusion of medium improves growth of human oral neomucosal tissue constructs. Wound Repair Regen. 9:2001;507-512.
39. Carrier R.L., et al. Perfusion improves tissue architecture of engineered cardiac muscle. Tissue Eng. 8:2002;175-188.
40. Pazzano D., et al. Comparison of chondrogenesis in static and perfused bioreactor culture. Biotechnol. Prog. 16:2000;893-896.
41. Williams K.A., et al. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of steady-state momentum and mass transport in a bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Prog. 18:2002;951-963.
42. Raimondi M.T., et al. Mechanobiology of engineered cartilage cultured under a quantified fluid-dynamic environment. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 1:2002;69-82.
43. Risbud M.V., Sittinger M. Tissue engineering: advances in in vitro cartilage generation. Trends Biotechnol. 20:2002;351-356.
44. Gomes M.E., et al. Effect of flow perfusion on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells cultured on starch-based three-dimensional scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 67A:2003;87-95.
45. Zein I., et al. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 23:2002;1169-1185.
46. Boland T., et al. Cell and organ printing 2: fusion of cell aggregates in three-dimensional gels. Anat. Rec. 272A:2003;497-502.
47. Begley C.M., Kleis S.J. The fluid dynamic and shear environment in the NASA/JSC rotating-wall perfused-vessel bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 70:2000;32-40.
48. Sucosky, P. et al. Fluid mechanics of a spinner-flask bioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (in press).
49. Obradovic B., et al. Glycosaminoglycan deposition in engineered cartilage: experiments and mathematical model. AIChE J. 46:2000;1860-1871.
50. Akhyari P., et al. Mechanical stretch regimen enhances the formation of bioengineered autologous cardiac muscle grafts. Circulation. 106:2002;I137-I142.
51. Powell C.A., et al. Mechanical stimulation improves tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 283:2002;C1557-C1565.
52. Kim B.S., et al. Cyclic mechanical strain regulates the development of engineered smooth muscle tissue. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1999;979-983.
53. Niklason L.E., et al. Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science. 284:1999;489-493.
54. Davisson T., et al. Static and dynamic compression modulate matrix metabolism in tissue engineered cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 20:2002;842-848.
55. Waldman S.D., et al. Effect of biomechanical conditioning on cartilaginous tissue formation in vitro. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am. 85A:(Suppl. 2):2003;101-105.
56. Mauck R.L., et al. Functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage through dynamic loading of chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:2000;252-260.
57. Altman G.H., et al. Cell differentiation by mechanical stress. FASEB J. 16:2002;270-272.
58. Démarteau O., et al. Development and validation of a bioreactor for physical stimulation of engineered cartilage. Biorheology. 40:2003;331-336.
59. Démarteau O., et al. Dynamic compression of cartilage constructs engineered from expanded human articular chondrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 310:2003;580-588.
60. Ratcliffe A., Niklason L.E. Bioreactors and bioprocessing for tissue engineering. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 961:2002;210-215.
61. Leventon W. Synthetic skin. IEEE Spectr. 39:2002;28-33.
62. Naughton G.K. From lab bench to market: critical issues in tissue engineering. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 961:2002;372-385.
63. Cabrita G.J., et al. Hematopoietic stem cells: from the bone to the bioreactor. Trends Biotechnol. 21:2003;233-240.
64. Jasmund I., Bader A. Bioreactor developments for tissue engineering applications by the example of the bioartificial liver. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 74:2002;99-109.
65. Martin I., et al. Modulation of the mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. Biorheology. 37:2000;141-147.