The effects of gender and previous experience on the approach of self and peer assessment: A case from Turkey

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 123-133

  Sasmaz Oren, Fatma ^a  

^a CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

gender; peer assessment; previous experience; science teaching skills; self assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861536819     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: 14703300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2012.677598     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baǧci-Kiliç, G. and Çakan, M. 2007. Peer assessment of elementary science teaching skills. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18: 91-107.
2. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K. and Mylonas, A. 2002. Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5): 427-441.
3. Baykara-Pehlivan, K. 2008. Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f öǧretmeni adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n sosyo-kültürel özellikleri ve öǧretmenlik mesleǧine yönelik tutumlari{dotless} üzerine bir çali{dotless}şma [A study on pre-service classroom teachers' socio-cultural properties and their attitudes toward teaching occupation as a subject]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 4(2): 151-168.
4. Berg, I.V.D., Admiraal, W. and Pilot, A. 2006. Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1): 19-36.
5. Bloxham, S. and West, A. 2004. Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6): 721-733.
6. Brooks, C.M. and Ammons, J.L. 2003. Free riding in group project and the effect of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 1(May): 268-272.
7. Çapri, B. and Çelikkaleli, Ö. 2008. Öǧretmen adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n öǧretmenliǧe ilişkin tutum ve mesleki yeterlik inançlari{dotless}ni{dotless}n cinsiyet, program ve fakültelerine göre incelenmesi [Investiation of preservice teachers' attitudes towards teaching and professional self-efficacy beliefs according to their gender, programs and faculties]. İnönü University's Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(15): 33-53.
8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 155-159. Retrieved September 9, 2009, fromhttp://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
9. Freeman, M. and McKenzie, J. 2002. SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5): 551-569.
10. Gatfield, T. 1999. Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4): 365-377.
11. Higher Education Council. (1998). Faculty-school collaboration. Ankara: Author. Retrieved February 7, 2008, fromhttp://www.yok.gov.tr/egitim/ogretmen/aday_ogretmen/bolum5.html
12. Kim, M. 2009. The impact of an elaborated Assessee's role in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1): 105-114.
13. Langan, A.M., Shuker, D.M., Cullen, W.R., Penney, D., Preziosi, R.F. and Wheater, C.P. 2008. Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2): 179-190.
14. Langan, A.M., Wheater, C.P., Shaw, E.M., Haines, B.J., Cullen, W.R.Boyle, J.C. 2005. Peer assessment of oral presentations: Effects of student gender, university affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1): 21-34.
15. Lejk, M. and Wyvill, M. 2001a. The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group Project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6): 551-561.
16. Lejk, M. and Wyvill, M. 2001b. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1): 61-72.
17. Lejk, M. and Wyvill, M. 2002. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: Student attitudes to holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6): 569-577.
18. Lopez-Real, F. and Chan, R.Y.P. 1999. Peer assessment of a group project in primary mathematics education course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(1): 67-79.
19. MacAlpine, J.M.K. 1999. Improving and encouraging peer assessment of student presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(1): 15-25.
20. Matsuno, S. 2009. Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1): 75-100.
21. Miller, P.J. 1999. The agreement of peer assessment and self-assessment of learning processes in problem-based learning. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 13(2): 26-30.
22. Ministry of National Education, Directorate of the Council of Education and Morality. 2006. İlköǧretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (6, 7 ve 8. si{dotless}ni{dotless}flar) öǧretim programi{dotless} [Elementary science and technology curriculum (for 6th, 7th, and 8th grades)], Ankara: Author.
23. Mok, M.M.C., Lung, C.L.C., Cheng, D.P.W., Cheung, R.H.P. and Ng, M.L. 2006. Self-assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4): 415-433.
24. Nurov, A. (2000). Self-assessment of foreign language achievement: The relationship between students' self-assessment, teachers' estimates and achievement test (Unpublished master's dissertation). Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
25. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. and Reiling, K. 1996. The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3): 239-249.
26. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. and Reiling, K. 2000. The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1): 23-38.
27. Özbek, R., Kahyaoǧlu, M., & Özgen, N. (2007). Öǧretmen adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n öǧretmenlik mesleǧine yönelik görüşlerinin deǧerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of candidate teachers' opinions on teaching profession]. Afyon Kocatepe University's Journal of Social Sciences, XI (2), 221-232. Retrieved June 7, 2008, fromwww.sosbil.aku.edu.tr/dergi/IX2/13ROzbek.pdf
28. Patri, M. 2002. The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2): 109-131.
29. Pope, N.K.L. 2005. The impact of stress in self- and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1): 51-63.
30. Purchase, H.C. 2000. Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4): 341-352.
31. Sivan, A. 2000. The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education, 7(2): 193-213.
32. Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Brand-Gruwell, S. and Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. 2002. Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5): 443-454.
33. Smith, H., Cooper, A. and Lancaster, L. 2002. Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1): 71-81.
34. Sung, Y.T., Lin, C.S., Lee, C.L. and Chang, K.E. 2003. Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of web-based self assessment and peer-assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 30(4): 331-334.
35. Topping, K.J., Smith, E.F., Swanson, I. and Elliot, A. 2000. Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2): 149-169.
36. Tsai, C.C., Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J. and Yuan, S.M. 2001. A networked peer assessment system based on a vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(3): 220-230.
37. Tu, Y. and Lu, M. 2005. Peer-and-self assessment to reveal the ranking of each individual's contribution to a group project. Journal of Information System Education, 16(2): 197-205.
38. Venables, A. and Summit, R. 2003. Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3): 281-290.
39. Willcoxson, L.E. 2006. 'It's not fair!': Assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork. Journal of Management Education, 30(6): 798-808.