Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A comparison of holistic and category-based approaches

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 61-72

  Lejk, Mark ^a   Wyvill, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346652911     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930020022291     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. CONWAY, R., KEMBER, D., SIVAN, A. & WU, M. (1993) Peer assessment of an individual 's contribution to a group project, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 45-56.
2. DEEKS, D. & LEJK, M. (1995) Real world computing, The New Academic, 4(2), pp. 15-16.
3. FALCHIKOV, N. (1988) Self and peer assessment of a group project designed to promote the skills of capability, Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 25(4), pp. 327-339.
4. FALCHIKOV, N. (1991) Group process analysis: self and peer assessment of working together in a group, in: S. Brown & P. Dove (Eds) Self and peer assessment, Standing Conference on Educational Development. Paper No. 63.
5. FALCHIKOV, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment, Innovation s in Education & Training Internationa l, 32(2), pp. 175-187.
6. GIBBS, G. (1995) Assessing Student Centred Courses (Oxford, Oxford Centre for Staff Development).
7. GOLDFINCH, J. (1994) Further development s in peer assessment of group projects, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1), pp. 29-35.
8. HABESHAW, S., GIBBS, G. & HABESHAW, T. (1993) 53 Interesting Ways to Assess Your Students, 3rd edn (Melksham, The Cromwell Press).
9. HUDDERSFIELD (1992) Draft School Quality Handbook (Hudders. eld, School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Hudders. eld).
10. LEJK M., WYVILL M. & FARROW, S. (1996) A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 267-280.
11. SCHECHTMAN, Z. (1991) A revised group assessment procedure for predicting initial teaching success, Educational and Psychologica l Measurement, 51(4), pp. 963-974.
12. SCHECHTMAN, Z. (1992) Inter-rate r reliability of a single group assessment procedure administered in several educational settings, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6, pp. 31-39.
13. SCHECHTMAN, Z. & GODFRIED, L. (1993) Assessing the performance and personal traits of teacher education students by a group assessment procedure: a study of concurren t and construct validity, Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), pp. 130-138.
14. SEARBY, M. & EWERS, T. (1997) An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), pp. 371-383.
15. STRACHAN, I. B. & WILCOX, S. (1996) Peer and self assessment of group work: developing an effective response to increased enrolment in a third-yea r course in microclimatology, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), pp. 343-353.
16. TOPPING, K. (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68(3), pp. 249-276.