The impact of an elaborated assessee's role in peer assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 105-114

  Kim, Minjeong ^a  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Assessee's role; Back feedback; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955477946     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930801955960     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Blom, D., and K. Poole. 2004. Peer assessment of tertiary music performance: Opportunities for understanding performance assessment and performing through experience and self-reflection. British Journal of Music Education 21, no. 1: 111-25.
2. Boud, D. 1995. Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
3. Butler, D.L., and P.H. Winne. 1995. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65: 245-81.
4. Carless, D. 2003. Learning-oriented assessment. Paper presented at the Evaluation and Assessment Conference, November 25, in University of South Australia, Adelaide.
5. Falchikov, N. 1995. Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International 32, no. 2: 175-87.
6. Garcia, T., and R. Pintrich. 1991. Student motivation and self-regulated learning: A LISREL model. Paper presented at the AERA, in Chicago, IL.
7. Gayo-Avello, D., and H. Fernandes-Cuervo. 2003. Online self-assessment as a learning method. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT' 03) July 9-11, Athens, Greece.
8. Johnson, R. 1999. Helping students to understand and use assessment for learning. In Innovations in teaching English and textual studies, ed. S. Avery, C. Bryan, and G. Wisker, 181-97. Birmingham: SEDA.
9. Keller, J.M. 1993. Motivation by design. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University, Florida.
10. Kim, M. 2003. Peer assessment as a learning method: Various assessment criteria for students with different self-regulation levels. Paper presented at the AECT, in Anaheim, CA.
11. Kim, M. 2005. The effects of the assessor and assessee's roles on preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness, performance, and attitude in a technology-related design task. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
12. Kim, M., and J. Ryu. 2004. Instrument validation study: Revised CIS, IMMS, and MAI. Unpublished manuscript.
13. McDowell, L. 1995. The impact of innovative assessment on student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International 32: 302-13.
14. Mok, M.M.C., C.L. Lung, D.P.W. Cheng, R.H.P. Cheung, and M.L. Ng. 2006. Self-assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 4: 415-43.
15. Purchase, H.C. 2000. Learning about interfacedesign through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27, no. 4: 341-52.
16. Rust, C., M. Price, and B. O'Donovan. 2003. Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 2: 147-64.
17. Schraw, G., and R.S. Dennison. 1994. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19: 460-75.
18. Searby, M., and T. Ewers. 1997. An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in school of Music, Kingston University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22, no. 4: 371-83.
19. Sluijsmans, D.M.A., S. Brand-Gruwel, J.J.G. van Merrienboer, and T.J. Bastiens. 2003. The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation 29: 23-42.
20. Smyth, K. 2004. The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 3: 369-78.
21. Topping, K. 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68, no. 3: 249-76.
22. Topping, K., F.F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot. 2000. Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25, no. 2: 149-69.
23. Tsai, C.-C., S.S.J. Lin, and S.-M. Yuan. 2002. Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education 38: 241-52.