The Visual World in Sight and Mind. How Attention and Memory Interact to Determine Visual Experience

Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory

Volumn 57, Issue , 2012, Pages 103-145

  Brockmole, James R ^a   Davoli, Christopher C ^a   Cronin, Deborah A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860627146     PISSN: 00797421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00003-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (204)

1. Abrams R.A., Christ S.E. Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science 2003, 14(5):427-432. 10.1111/1467-9280.01458.
2. Abrams R.A., Davoli C.C., Du F., Knapp W.H., Paull D. Altered vision near the hands. Cognition 2008, 107(3):1035-1047. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006.
3. Allen R.J., Baddeley A.D., Hitch G.J. Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135(2):298-313. 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.298.
4. Alvarez G.A., Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science 2004, 15(2):106-111. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x.
5. Alvarez G.A., Thompson T.W. Overwriting and rebinding: Why feature-switch detection tasks underestimate the binding capacity of visual working memory. Visual Cognition 2009, 17(1-2):141-159. 10.1080/13506280802265496.
6. Arend I., Johnston S., Shapiro K. Task-irrelevant visual motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(4):600-607.
7. Averbach E., Coriell A.S. Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal 1961, 40:309-328.
8. Awh E., Jonides J., Reuter-Lorenz P. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(3):780-790. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.780.
9. Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., Pelz J.B. Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1995, 7(1):66-80. 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66.
10. Barton, B., Ester, E. F., & Awh, E. Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1359-1367.
11. Bays P.M., Catalao R.F.G., Husain M. The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(10). 10.1167/9.10.7.
12. Bays P.M., Husain M. Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science 2008, 321(5890):851-854. 10.1126/science.1158023.
13. Boot W.R., Brockmole J.R., Simons D.J. Attention capture is modulated in dual-task situations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12(4):662-668.
14. Brady T.F., Chun M.M. Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(4):798-815. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.798.
15. Braet W., Humphreys G.W. The role of reentrant processes in feature binding: Evidence from neuropsychology and TMS on late onset illusory conjunctions. Visual Cognition 2009, 17(1-2):25-47. 10.1080/13506280802193318.
16. Braun J. Vision and attention: The role of training. Nature 1998, 393:424-425.
17. Broadbent D.E. Perception and communication 1958, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, US. 10.1037/10037-000.
18. Broadbent D.E., Broadbent M.H. From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics 1987, 42(2):105-113.
19. Brockmole J.R., Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32(4):699-706. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.699.
20. Binding 2009, Psychology Press, Hove, UK. 10.1080/13506280802333211. J.R. Brockmole, S.L. Franconeri (Eds.).
21. Brockmole J.R., Hambrick D.Z., Windisch D.J., Henderson J.M. The role of meaning in contextual cueing: Evidence from chess expertise. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61(12):1886-1896. 10.1080/17470210701781155.
22. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(5):857-868. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.857.
23. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12(6):1061-1067.
24. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition 2006, 13(1):99-108. 10.1080/13506280500165188.
25. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59(7):1177-1187. 10.1080/17470210600665996.
26. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object-scene consistency. Visual Cognition 2008, 16(2-3):375-390. 10.1080/13506280701453623.
27. Brockmole J.R., Vo M.L.-H. Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72:1803-1813.
28. Brown J. Information, redundancy and decay of the memory trace. Mechanisation of thought processes 1959, H.M.S.O, London.
29. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review 1990, 97(4):523-547. 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523.
30. Bundesen C., Habekost T. Principles of visual attention 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Bundesen C., Shibuya H., Larsen A. Visual selection from multielement displays: A model for partial report. Attention and performance XI 1985, 631-649. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.I. Posner, Q.S.M. Marin (Eds.).
32. Cahn S., Van Heusen J. Love and marriage [Recorded by Frank Sinatra] 1955, Capitol Records, Los Angeles.
33. Calvo-Merino B., Glaser D.E., Grèzes J., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(8):1243-1249. 10.1093/cercor/bhi007.
34. Calvo-Merino B., Ehrenberg S., Leung D., Haggard P. Experts see it all: Configural effects in action observation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2010, 74(4):400-406. 10.1007/s00426-009-0262-y.
35. Carlson T.A., Hogendoorn H., Verstraten F.A.J. The speed of visual attention: what time is it? RID B-4720-2011. Journal of Vision 2006, 6(12):1406-1411. 10.1167/6.12.6.
36. Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition 2005, 12(6):1017-1040. 10.1080/13506280444000634.
37. Castiello U., Paine M. Effects of left parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2002, 72(1):73-76. 10.1136/jnnp.72.1.73.
38. Chakravarthi R., Van Rullen R. Bullet trains and steam engines: Exogenous attention zips but endogenous attention chugs along RID B-2150-2008. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(4):12. 10.1167/11.4.12.
39. Chua F.K. A new object captures attention-but only when you know it's new. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71(4):699-711. 10.3758/APP.71.4.699.
40. Chua F.K. Previewing modulates attentional capture. Visual Cognition 2011, 19(4):511-533. 10.1080/13506285.2011.554335.
41. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36(1):28-71. 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681.
42. Chun M.M., Potter M.C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21(1):109-127. 10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.109.
43. Cowan N. Childhood development of some basic parameters of working memory. Leipzig Series in Cognitive Sciences 2000, Vol. 1. Leipziger Universitätsverlag, Leipzig. E. Schröger, A. Mecklinger, A.D. Friederici (Eds.).
44. Currie C.B., McConkie G.W., Carlson-Radvansky L., Irwin D.E. The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62(4):673-683.
45. Davoli C.C., Brockmole J.R., Goujon A. A bias to detail: how hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory. Memory & Cognition 2012, 40:352-359.
46. Davoli C.C., Suszko J.W., Abrams R.A. New objects can capture attention without a unique luminance transient. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14(2):338-343.
47. Deco G., Zihl J. Top-down selective visual attention: A neurodynamical approach. Visual Cognition 2001, 8(1):119-140.
48. Dell'Acqua R., Jolicœur P., Luria R., Pluchino P. Reevaluating encoding-capacity limitations as a cause of the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(2):338-351. 10.1037/a0013555.
49. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18(0147-006):193-222. 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205.
50. Deubel H., Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 1996, 36(12):1827-1837. 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4.
51. Deutsch J.A., Deutsch D. Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review 1963, 70(1):80-90. 10.1037/h0039515.
52. Dijkstra K., MacMahon C., Misirlisoy M. The effects of golf expertise and presentation modality on memory for golf and everyday items. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128(2):298-303. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.001.
53. Donchin E. Surprise!... Surprise?. Psychophysiology 1981, 18(5):493-513. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x.
54. Donk M. The preview benefit: Visual marking, feature-based inhibition, temporal segregation, or onset capture?. Visual Cognition 2006, 14(4-8):736-748. 10.1080/13506280500193230.
55. Downing P.E. Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science 2000, 11(6):467-473. 10.1111/1467-9280.00290.
56. Downing P.E., Dodds C.M. Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition 2004, 11(6):689-703. 10.1080/13506280344000446.
57. Droll J.A., Hayhoe M.M. Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(6):1352-1365. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1352.
58. Droll J.A., Hayhoe M.M., Triesch J., Sullivan B.T. Task demands control acquisition and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(6):1416-1438. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1416.
59. Dux P.E., Asplund C.L., Marois R. Both exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink: A reply to Olivers, Spalek, Kawahara, and Di Lollo (2009). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(1):219-224. 10.3758/PBR.16.1.219.
60. Dux P.E., Marois R. The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71(8):1683-1700. 10.3758/APP.71.8.1683.
61. Ehinger K.A., Brockmole J.R. The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Perception & Psychophysics 2008, 70(7):1366-1378. 10.3758/PP.70.7.1366.
62. Elsley J.V., Parmentier F.B.R. Is verbal-spatial binding in working memory impaired by a concurrent memory load?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62(9):1696-1705. 10.1080/17470210902811231.
63. Enns J.T., Austen E.L., Di Lollo V., Rauschenberger R., Yantis S. New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(6):1287-1302. 10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1287.
64. Eriksen C.W., St.James J.D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics 1986, 40(4):225-240.
65. Eriksen C.W., Yeh Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11(5):583-597. 10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.583.
66. Ferlazzo F., Lucido S., Di Nocera F., Fagioli S., Sdoia S. Switching between goals mediates the attentional blink effect. Experimental Psychology 2007, 54(2):89-98. 10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.89.
67. Fougnie D., Marois R. Attentive tracking disrupts feature binding in visual working memory. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:48-66.
68. Franconeri S.L., Hollingworth A., Simons D.J. Do new objects capture attention?. Psychological Science 2005, 16(4):275-281. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01528.x.
69. Franconeri S.L., Simons D.J. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65(7):999-1010.
70. Fukuda K., Awh E., Vogel E.K. Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20(2):177-182. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.005.
71. Gajewski D.A., Brockmole J.R. Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(4):581-587.
72. Gajewski D.A., Henderson J.M. Minimal use of working memory in a scene comparison task. Visual Cognition 2005, 12(6):979-1002. 10.1080/13506280444000616.
73. Gauthier I., Curran T., Curby K.M., Collins D. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6(4):428-432. 10.1038/nn1029.
74. Gibson B.S., Folk C.L., Theeuwes J., Kingstone A. Visual Cognition 2008, 16(2-3):145-154. 10.1080/13506280701843708.
75. Giesbrecht B., Sy J.L., Lewis M.K. Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection. Vision Research 2009, 49(10):1378-1388. 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.013.
76. Gordon R.D. Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(4):760-777. 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.760.
77. Goujon A. Categorical implicit learning in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cueing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 64(5):920-941. 10.1080/17470218.2010.526231.
78. Goujon A., Brockmole J.R. How visual and semantic information influence learning in familiar contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012.
79. Goujon A., Didierjean A., Marmèche E. Contextual cueing based on specific and categorical properties of the environment. Visual Cognition 2007, 15(3):257-275. 10.1080/13506280600677744.
80. Goujon A., Didierjean A., Marmèche E. Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35(1):50-71. 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.50.
81. Griffin I.C., Nobre A.C. Orientational attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(8):1176-1194. 10.1162/089892903322598139.
82. Grimes J. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades 1996, 89-110. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US, 89. K.A. Akins (Ed.).
83. Hayhoe M. Vision using routines: A functional account of vision. Visual Cognition 2000, 7(1-3):43-64. 10.1080/135062800394676.
84. Hayhoe M.M., Bensinger D.G., Ballard D.H. Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision Research 1998, 38(1):125-137. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00116-8.
85. Heinke D., Humphreys G.W. Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychological Review 2003, 110(1):29-87. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.29.
86. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. Eye guidance in reading and scene perception 1998, Elsevier, Oxford. G.D.M. Underwood (Ed.).
87. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science 1999, 10(5):438-443. 10.1111/1467-9280.00183.
88. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65(1):58-71.
89. Hoffman J.E., Subramaniam B. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57(6):787-795.
90. Hollingworth A., Schrock G., Henderson J.M. Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene. Memory & Cognition 2001, 29(2):296-304.
91. Hollingworth A., Simons D.J., Franconeri S.L. New objects do not capture attention without a sensory transient. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72(5):1298-1310. 10.3758/APP.72.5.1298.
92. Hollingworth A. Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(3):519-537. 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.519.
93. Hollingworth A. Memory for real-world scenes 2009, 89-116. Psychology Press, New York, NY, US. J.R. Brockmole (Ed.).
94. Hollingworth A., Henderson J.M. Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition 2000, 7(1-3):213-235. 10.1080/135062800394775.
95. Hollingworth A., Henderson J.M. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28(1):113-136. 10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113.
96. Hommel B., Colzato L.S. When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Visual Cognition 2009, 17(1-2):120-140. 10.1080/13506280802349787.
97. Humphreys G.W., Müller H.J. SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): a connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology 1993, 25(1):43-110. 10.1006/cogp.1993.1002.
98. Ibos G., Duhamel J.-R., Hamed S.B. The spatial and temporal deployment of voluntary attention across the visual field. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(8). 10.1371/journal.pone.0006716.
99. Irwin D.E., Andrews R.V. Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements 1996, 125-155. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US. T. Inui, J.L. McClelland (Eds.).
100. Irwin D.E., Colcombe A.M., Kramer A.F., Hahn S. Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons. Vision Research 2000, 40(10-12):1443-1458. 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00030-4.
101. Irwin D.E., Gordon R.D. Eye movements, attention and trans-saccadic memory. Visual Cognition 1998, 5(1-2):127-155. 10.1080/713756783.
102. Itti L., Koch C. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research 2000, 40(10-12):1489-1506. 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7.
103. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, Henry Holt and Company, NY, US. 10.1037/11059-000.
104. Jiang Y., Song J. Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: Learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(6):1439-1448. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1439.
105. Jiang Y.H., Wagner L.C. What is learned in spatial contextual cuing-configuration or individual locations?. Perception & Psychophysics 2004, 66:454-463.
106. Johnson J.S., Hollingworth A., Luck S.J. The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(1):41-55. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.41.
107. Kane M.J., Bleckley M.K., Conway A.R.A., Engle R.W. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130(2):169-183. 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169.
108. Kowler E., Anderson E., Dosher B., Blaser E. The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research 1995, 35(13):1897-1916. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-U.
109. Kunar M.A., Flusberg S., Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(4):816-828. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816.
110. Land M.F., Hayhoe M. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?. Vision Research 2001, 41(25-26):3559-3565. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00102-X.
111. Levin D.T., Simons D.J. Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4(4):501-506.
112. Logie R.H., Brockmole J.R., Vandenbroucke A.R.E. Bound feature combinations in visual short-term memory are fragile but influence long-term learning. Visual Cognition 2009, 17(1-2):160-179. 10.1080/13506280802228411.
113. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390(6657):279-281. 10.1038/36846.
114. Mack A., Rock I. Inattentional blindness 1998, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US.
115. Maki W.S., Padmanabhan G. Transient suppression of processing during rapid serial visual presentation: Acquired distinctiveness of probes modulates the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1(4):499-504.
116. Malcolm G.L., Henderson J.M. The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(11). 10.1167/9.11.8.
117. Martens S., Johnson A. Timing attention: Cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33(2):234-240.
118. Martens S., Johnson A. Working memory capacity, intelligence and the magnitude of the attentional blink revisited. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 129:43-52.
119. Martens S., Wolters G., van Raamsdonk M. Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28(6):1275-1287. 10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1275.
120. Martens S., Wyble B. The attentional blink: Past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34(6):947-957. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.005.
121. Mathewson K.J., Arnell K.M., Mansfield C.A. Capturing and holding attention: The impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36(1):182-200. 10.3758/MC.36.1.182.
122. Matin E. Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1974, 81(12):899-917. 10.1037/h0037368.
123. Matsukura M., Brockmole J.R., Boot W.R., Henderson J.M. Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load. Vision Research 2011, 51(6):546-552. 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.014.
124. Matsukura M., Luck S.J., Vecera S.P. Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization?. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69(8):1422-1434.
125. McCarley J.S., Wang R.F., Kramer A.F., Irwin D.E., Peterson M.S. How much memory does oculomotor search have?. Psychological Science 2003, 14(5):422-426. 10.1111/1467-9280.01457.
126. McConkie G.W., Currie C.B. Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22(3):563-581. 10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.563.
127. Moores E., Laiti L., Chelazzi L. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:182-189.
128. Mozer Michael C. The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach 1991, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US.
129. Nickerson R.S. On long-term recognition memory for pictorial material. Psychonomic Science 1968, 11(2).
130. Nieuwenstein M.R., Chun M.M., van D.L., Hooge I.T.C. Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31(6):1463-1475. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1463.
131. Nieuwenstein M.R., Potter M.C. Temporal limits of selection and memory encoding: A comparison of whole versus partial report in rapid serial visual presentation. Psychological Science 2006, 17(6):471-475. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01730.x.
132. Oh S., Kim M. The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11(2):275-281.
133. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W., Braithwaite J.J. The preview search task: Evidence for visual marking. Visual Cognition 2006, 14(4-8):716-735. 10.1080/13506280500194188.
134. Olivers C.N.L., Meeter M. A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review 2008, 115(4):836-863. 10.1037/a0013395.
135. Olivers C.N.L., Meijer F., Theeuwes J. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(5):1243-1265. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243.
136. Olivers C.N.L., Nieuwenhuis S. The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science 2005, 16(4):265-269. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01526.x.
137. Olivers C.N.L., Nieuwenhuis S. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(2):364-379. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.364.
138. Olsson H., Poom L. The noisy cue abstraction model is equivalent to the multiplicative prototype model. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2005, 100(3):819-820. 10.2466/PMS.100.3.819-820.
139. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F. Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(7):1239-1249.
140. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F. Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors. Visual Cognition 2001, 8(6):843-859. 10.1080/13506280042000180.
141. Peterson L., Peterson M.J. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959, 58(3):193-198. 10.1037/h0049234.
142. Phaf R.H., Van der Heijden A.H., Hudson P.T. SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology 1990, 22(3):273-341. 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90006-P.
143. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32(1):3-25. 10.1080/00335558008248231.
144. Potter M.C., Nieuwenstein M., Strohminger N. Whole report versus partial report in RSVP sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58(4):907-915. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.002.
145. Pratt J., Hommel B. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29(5):835-845. 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.835.
146. Rafal R.D., Calabresi P.A., Brennan C.W., Sciolto T.K. Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15(4):673-685. 10.1037/0096-1523.15.4.673.
147. Rao R., Zelinsky G., Hayhoe M., Ballard D. Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research 2002, 42(11):1447-1463.
148. Rauschenberger R. Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10(4):814-842.
149. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18(3):849-860. 10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849.
150. Reed C.L., Betz R., Garza J.P., Roberts R.J. Grab it! biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72(1):236-245. 10.3758/APP.72.1.236.
151. Reed C.L., Grubb J.D., Steele C. Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(1):166-177. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.166.
152. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 1997, 8(5):368-373. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x.
153. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltá C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25(1):31-40. 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8.
154. Rock I., Linnett C.M., Grant P., Mack A. Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24(4):502-534. 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90017-V.
155. Schmidt B.K., Vogel E.K., Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64(5):754-763.
156. Seegmiller J.K., Watson J.M., Strayer D.L. Individual differences in susceptibility to inattentional blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37(3):785-791. 10.1037/a0022474.
157. Seiffert A.E., Di Lollo V. Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23(4):1061-1073. 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1061.
158. Shapiro K., Driver J., Ward R., Sorensen R.E. Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science 1997, 8(2):95-100. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00689.x.
159. Shepherd M., Findlay J.M., Hockey R.J. The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 1986, 38(3):475-491.
160. Simons D.J., Chabris C.F. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 1999, 28(9):1059-1074. 10.1068/p2952.
161. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5(4):644-649.
162. Simons D.J., Rensink R.A. Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(1):16-20. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006.
163. Smyth A.C., Shanks D.R. Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36(2):403-415. 10.3758/MC.36.2.403.
164. Soto D., Heinke D., Humphreys G.W., Blanco M.J. Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 33(3):730-737. 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248.
165. Soto D., Humphreys G.W. Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 31(2):248-261. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.730.
166. Soto D., Humphreys G.W., Heinke D. Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research 2006, 46(6-7):1010-1018. 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.008.
167. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 1960, 74(11):1-29. 10.1037/h0093759.
168. Sperling G., Weichselgartner E. Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review 1995, 102:503-532.
169. Standing L. Learning 10,000 pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 25(2):207-222. 10.1080/14640747308400340.
170. Standing L., Conezio J., Haber R.N. Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science 1970, 19(2):73-74.
171. Tatler B.W., Gilchrist I.D., Rusted J. The time course of abstract visual representation. Perception 2003, 32(5):579-592. 10.1068/p3396.
172. Theeuwes J., Godijn R., Pratt J. A new estimation of the duration of attentional dwell time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11(1):60-64.
173. Tipper S.P., Lortie C., Baylis G.C. Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18(4):891-905. 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.891.
174. Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review 2006, 113(4):766-786. 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766.
175. Treisman A.M. Selective attention in man. British Medical Bulletin 1964, 20(1):12-16.
176. Treisman A. How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition 2006, 14(4-8):411-443. 10.1080/13506280500195250.
177. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12(1):97-136. 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5.
178. Triesch J., Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., Sullivan B.T. What you see is what you need. Journal of Vision 2003, 3(1):86-94. 10.1167/3.1.9.
179. Tseng P., Bridgeman B. Improved change detection with nearby hands. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 209(2):257-269. 10.1007/s00221-011-2544-z.
180. Tseng P., Tuennermann J., Roker-Knight N., Winter D., Scharlau I., Bridgeman B. Enhancing implicit change detection through action. Perception 2010, 39(10):1311-1321. 10.1068/p6711.
181. Unsworth N., Engle R.W. On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133(6):1038-1066. 10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.1038.
182. Van Rullen R. Binding hardwired versus on-demand feature conjunctions. Visual Cognition 2009, 17(1-2):103-118. 10.1080/13506280802196451.
183. Vogel E.K., Luck S.J., Shapiro K.L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(6):1656-1674. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656.
184. Vogel E.K., Machizawa M.G. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 2004, 428:748-775.
185. Vogel E.K., McCullough A.W., Machizawa M.G. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature 2005, 438(7067):500-503. 10.1038/nature04171.
186. Vogel E.K., Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(6):1436-1451. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1436.
187. Volkmann F.C. Human visual suppression. Vision Research 1986, 26(9):1401-1416. 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90164-1.
188. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 1997, 104(1):90-122. 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.90.
189. Weichselgartner E., Sperling G. Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science 1987, 238(4828):778-780. 10.1126/science.3672124.
190. Wheeler M.E., Treisman A.M. Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131(1):48-64. 10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.48.
191. Wilken P., Ma W.J. A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision 2004, 4(12):1120-1135. 10.1167/4.12.11.
192. Williams C.C., Henderson J.M., Zacks R.T. Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67(5):816-827.
193. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1(2):202-238.
194. Wolfe J.M., Alvarez G.A., Horowitz T.S. Attention is fast but volition is slow. Nature 2000, 406(6797). 10.1038/35021132.
195. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Kenner N., Hyle M., Vasan N. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research 2004, 44(12):1411-1426. 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024.
196. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11(2):269-274.
197. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:363-377.
198. Wundt W. An introduction to psychology 1912, MacMillan Co, New York, NY, US.
199. Yang S., Gallo D.A., Beilock S.L. Embodied memory judgments: A case of motor fluency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35(5):1359-1365. 10.1037/a0016547.
200. Yantis S., Hillstrom A.P. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20(1):95-107. 10.1037/0096-1523.20.1.95.
201. Yantis S., Jonides J. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22(6):1505-1513. 10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1505.
202. Zelinsky G.J. A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review 2008, 115(4):787-835. 10.1037/a0013118.
203. Zhang W., Luck S.J. Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12(1):24-25. 10.1038/nn.2223.
204. Zuber B.L., Stark L. Saccadic suppression: Elevation of visual threshold associated with saccadic eye movements. Experimental Neurology 1966, 16(1):65-79. 10.1016/0014-4886(66)90087-2.