Attention, Spatial Representation, and Visual Neglect: Simulating Emergent Attention and Spatial Memory in the Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM)

Psychological Review

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-87

  Heinke, Dietmar ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELD;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 85047688600     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.29     Document Type: Article

References (191)

1. Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neuro-physiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Amari, S. (1982). Competitive and cooperative aspects in dynamics of neural excitation and self-organization. In S. Amari & M. A. Arbib (Eds.), Competition and cooperation in neural nets. London: Springer-Verlag.
3. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effects of grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.
4. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451-470.
5. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Attention across multiple reference frames: Evidence from visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 83-101.
7. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
8. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
9. Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B352, 1203-1220.
10. Bisiach, E., Capitani, E., Colombo, A., & Spinnler, H. (1976). Halving a horizontal segment: A study on hemisphere-damaged patients with focal cerebral lesions. Archives Suisses de Neurologie et de Psychiatrie, 118, 199-206.
11. Bisiach, E., & Luzzatti, C. (1978). Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex, 14, 129-133.
12. Brunn, J. L., & Farah, M. J. (1991). The relation between spatial attention and reading: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 59-75.
13. Buck, B. H., Black, S. E., Behrmann, M., Caldwell, C., & Bronskill, M. J. (1999). Spatial- and object-based attentional deficits in Alzheimer's disease: Relationship to SPECT measures of parietal performance. Brain, 120, 1229-1244.
14. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
15. Bundesen, C. (1998). A computational theory of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B353, 1271-1282.
16. Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Montgomery, M. W., & Farah, M. J. (1996). Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia, 34, 113-126.
17. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Levels of representation, coordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 319-345.
18. Cave, K. R. (1999). The FeatureGate model of visual selection. Psychological Research, 62, 182-194.
19. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
20. Cheal, M. L., Lyon, D. R., & Gottlob, L. R. (1994). A framework for understanding the allocation of attention in location-precued discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 699-739.
21. Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993, May 27). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363, 345-347.
22. Cocchini, G., Cubelli, R., Della Sala, S., & Beschin, N. (1999). Neglect without extinction. Cortex, 35, 285-313.
23. Cohen, J. D., Farah, M. J., Romero, R. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1994). Mechanisms of spatial attention: The relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal attentional deficits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 377-387.
24. Coltheart, M. (1983). Iconic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B302, 283-294.
25. Corbetta, M., Shulman, G., Miezin, F., & Petersen, S. (1995, November 3). Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science, 270, 802-805.
26. Costello, A. D., & Warrington, E. K. (1987). The dissociation of visual neglect and neglect dyslexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 50, 1110-1116.
27. Cowey, A., Small, M., & Ellis, S. (1994). Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1059-1066.
28. Cubelli, R., Nichelli, P., Bonito, V., De Tanti, A., & Inzaghi, M. G. (1991). Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral neglect. Brain and Cognition, 15, 139-159.
29. Deco, G., & Zihl, J. (2001). Top-down selective visual attention: A neurodynamical approach. Visual Cognition, 8, 119-140.
30. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosia patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 958-975.
31. Desimone, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B353, 1245-1256.
32. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
33. Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1989). Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In E. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
34. Donnelly, N., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 561-570.
35. Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., & Rafal, R. D. (1992, November 5). Preserved figure-ground segmentation in visual matching. Nature, 360, 73-75.
36. Driver, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 475-496.
37. Driver, J., & Mattingley, J. B. (1995). Normal and pathological selective attention in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 191-197.
38. Driver, J., & Pouget, A. (2000). Object-centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 542-545.
39. Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992, January 3). The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science, 255, 90-92.
40. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
41. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
42. Duncan, J. (1998). Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B353, 1307-1318.
43. Duncan, J., Bundesen, C., Olson, A., Humphreys, G. W., Chavda, S., & Shibuya, H. (1999). Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 450-478.
44. Duncan, J., Humphreys, G. W., & Ward, R. (1997). Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 255-261.
45. Edelman, S., & Duvdevani-Bar, S. (1997). A model of visual recognition and categorization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B352, 1191-1202.
46. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 123, 161-177.
47. Elder, J., & Zucker, S. (1993). The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes. Vision Research, 33, 981-991.
48. Ellis, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Connectionist psychology: A text with readings. London: Psychology Press.
49. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
50. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y-Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
51. Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Farah, M. J., Monheit, M. A., & Wallace, M. A. (1991). Unconscious perception of "extinguished" visual stimuli: Re-assessing the evidence. Neuropsychologia, 29, 949-958.
53. Feldman, J. A., & Ballard, D. H. (1982). Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science, 6, 205-254.
54. Findlay, J. (1982). Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 22, 1033-1045.
55. Gaffan, D., & Hornak, J. (1997). Visual neglect in the monkey. Representation and disconnection. Brain, 120, 1647-1657.
56. Gainotti, G., d'Erme, P., Monteleone, D., & Silveri, M. C. (1986). Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Brain, 109, 599-612.
57. Gibson, B., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
58. Gilchrist, I., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1223-1256.
59. Gilchrist, I., Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Neumann, H. (1997). Luminance and edge information in grouping: A study using visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 464-480.
60. Glendinning, P. (1995). Stability, instability and chaos: An introduction to the theory of nonlinear differential equations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
61. Gorea, A., & Sagi, D. (2000). Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 12380-12384.
62. Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998, January 29). The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature, 391, 481-484.
63. Grabowecky, M., Robertson, L. C., & Treisman, A. (1993). Preattentive processes guide visual search: Evidence from patients with unilateral visual neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 288-302.
64. Grice, G. R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J. M. (1983). Forest before trees? It depends where you look. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 121-128.
65. Gross, C. G., Rocha-Miranda, C. E., & Bender, D. B. (1972). Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 96-111.
66. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1988). How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex, 24, 321-328.
67. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991, April 11). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350, 498-500.
68. Han, S., Humphreys, G. W., & Chen, L. (1999). Competitive and cooperative processes in hierarchical analysis: Perceptual grouping and computation of closure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1411-1432.
69. Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5, 166-170.
70. Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). SAIM: A model of visual attention and neglect. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 913-918.
71. Hinton, G. E. (1981a). Implementing semantic networks in parallel hardware. In G. E. Hinton & J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Parallel models of associative memory (pp. 161-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Hinton, G. E. (1981b). A parallel computation that assigns canonical object-based frames of reference. Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 683-685.
73. Hinton, G. E., & Lang, K. (1985). Shape recognition and illusory conjunctions. Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1088-1096
74. Hirsch, J., & Mjolsness, E. (1992). A center-of-mass computation describes the precision of random dot displacement discrimination. Vision Research, 32, 335-346.
75. Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81, 3088-3092.
76. Hopfield, J. J., & Tank, D. W. (1985). Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biological Cybernetics, 52, 141-152.
77. Hummel, J., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
78. Humphreys, G. W. (1983). Frames of reference and shape perception. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 151-196.
79. Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Neural representation of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B353, 1341-1352.
80. Humphreys, G. W., Boucart, M., Datar, V., & Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Processing of fragmented forms and strategic control of orienting in visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 177-203.
81. Humphreys, G. W., Freeman, T. A. C., & Müller, H. M. (1992). Lesioning a connectionist model of visual search: Selective effects on distractor grouping. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 417-460.
82. Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (1997). Selection for object identification: Modelling emergent attentional processes in normality and pathology. In J. A. Bullinaria, D. W. Glasspool, & G. Houghton (Eds.), Connectionist representations: The 4th Neural Computing and Psychology Workshop (pp. 98-112). London: Springer-Verlag.
83. Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (1998). Spatial representation and selection in the brain: Neuropsychological and computational constraints. Visual Cognition, 5, 9-47.
84. Humphreys, G. W., & Müller, H. M. (1993). SEearch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43-110.
85. Humphreys, G. W., Olson, A., Romani, C., & Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Competitive mechanisms of selection by space and object: A neuropsychological approach. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 365-393). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
86. Humphreys, G. W., & Price, C. J. (2001). Cognitive neuropsychology and functional brain imaging: Implications for functional and anatomical models of cognition. Acta Psychologica, 107, 119-153.
87. Humphreys, G. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1987). Normal and pathological processes in visual object constancy. In G. W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.), Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach (pp. 43-106). London: Erlbaum.
88. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1993). Interactions between space and object systems revealed through neuropsychology. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 14, pp. 143-162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1994). Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 207-242.
90. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 283-312.
91. Humphreys, G. W., Romani, C., Olson, A., Riddoch, M. J., & Duncan, J. (1994, November 24). Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans. Nature, 372, 357-359.
92. Husain, M., & Kennard, C. (1996). Visual neglect associated with frontal lobe infarction. Journal of Neurology, 243, 652-657.
93. Husain, M., Mannan, S., Hodgson, T., Wojciulik, E., Driver, J., & Kennard, C. (2001). Impaired spatial working memory contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. Brain, 124, 941-952.
94. Husain, M., Shapiro, K., Martin, J., & Kennard, C. (1997, January 9). Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial attention in humans. Nature, 385, 154-156.
95. Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M., Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (2000). Capture of the eyes by color and onset singletons. Vision Research, 40, 1443-1458.
96. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
98. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1983). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
99. Karnath, H-O. (1988). Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect. Neuropsychologia, 26, 27-43.
100. Karnath, H-O., Schenkel, P., & Fischer, B. (1991). Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the "contralesional" deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. Brain, 114, 1997-2014.
101. Kim, M-S., & Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 6, 376-380.
102. Kimchi, R. (1994). The role of wholistic/configural properties versus global properties in visual form perception. Perception, 23, 489-504.
103. Klein, R. (1988, August 4). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
104. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
105. Kovacs, I., & Julesz, B. (1993). A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 7495-7497.
106. Kramer, A. F., Weber, T. A., & Watson, S. E. (1997). Object-based attentional selection: Grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 3-13.
107. Kumada, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 465-478.
108. Ladavas, E., Petronio, A., & Umilta, C. (1990). The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex, 26, 307-317.
109. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. E., Mangun, G. R., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1994). Independent attentional scanning in the separated hemispheres of splitbrain patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 84-91.
110. Lupianez, J., & Weaver, B. (1998). On the time course of exogenous cueing effects: A commentary on Tassinari et al. (1994). Vision Research, 38, 1619-1621.
111. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
112. Marr, D., & Poggio, T. (1976, October 15). Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. Science, 194, 283-287.
113. Marshall, J. C., & Halligan, P. W. (1990). Line bisection in a case of visual neglect: Psychophysical studies with implications for theory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 107-130.
114. Marshall, J. C., & Halligan, P. W. (1994). The yin and yang of visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1037-1057.
115. Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory and Cognition, 7, 479-484.
116. Mattingley, J., Driver, J., Beschwin, N., & Robertson, I. H. (1997). Attentional competition between modalities: Extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia, 35, 867-880.
117. Maylor, E. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 11, pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
118. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
119. McGowan, J. W., Kowler, E., Sharma, A., & Chubb, C. (1998). Saccadic localization of random dot targets. Vision Research, 38, 895-909.
120. McLeod, P., & Driver, J. (1993). Filtering and physiology in visual search: A convergence of behavioural and neurophysiological measures. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Awareness, selection and control (pp. 72-86). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
121. McLeod, P., Plunkett, K., & Rolls, E. T. (1998). Introduction to connectionist modelling of cognitive processes. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
122. Miceli, G., & Capasso, R. (2001). Word-centered neglect dyslexia: Evidence from a new case. Neurocase, 7, 221-237.
123. Milner, A. D., & Harvey, M. (1995). Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect. Current Biology, 5, 85-89.
124. Mjolsness, E., & Garrett, C. (1990). Algebraic transformations of objective functions. Neural Networks, 3, 651-669.
125. Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985, August 23). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782-784.
126. Morgan, M. J., Hole, G. J., & Glennerster, A. (1990). Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Vision Research, 30, 1793-1810.
127. Mozer, M. C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
128. Mozer, M. C. (1999). Do attention and perception require multiple reference frames? Evidence from a computational model of unilateral neglect. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stones (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 456-461). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
129. Mozer, M. C., & Behrmann, M. (1990). On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist account of neglect dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 96-123.
130. Mozer, M. C., Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1997). The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 171-190.
131. Mozer, M. C., & Sitton, M. (1998). Computational modeling of spatial attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 341-393). London: Psychology Press.
132. Müller, H. M., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
133. Müller, H. M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
134. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
135. Nakayama, K., & Mackleben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631-1647.
136. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986, March 20-26). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
137. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
138. Nieber, E., Koch, C., & Rosin, C. (1993). An oscillation-based model for the neuronal basis of attention. Vision Research, 33, 2789-2802.
139. Olshausen, B., Andersen, C., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 4700-4719.
140. Olshausen, B., Andersen, C., & Van Essen, D. C. (1995). A multiscale dynamic routing circuit for forming size- and position-invariant object representations. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 2, 45-62.
141. Olson, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Connectionist models of neuro-psychological disorders. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 222-228.
142. Ottes, F. P., Van Gisbergen, J. A. M., & Eggermont, J. J. (1985). Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system. Vision Research, 25, 849-862.
143. Pavlovskaya, M., Glass, I., Soroker, N., Blum, B., & Groswasser, Z. (1997). Coordinate frame for pattern recognition in unilateral neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 824-834.
144. Pfaf, R. H., van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.
145. Pomerantz, J. R. (1981). Perceptual organization in information processing. In D. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 141-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
147. Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408.
148. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 10, pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
149. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863-1874.
150. Pouget, A., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). A new view of hemineglect based on the response properties of parietal neurons. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B352, 1449-1459.
151. Pouget, A., & Snyder, L. H. (2000, November). Computational approaches to sensorimotor transformations. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1192-1198.
152. Press, W. H. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
153. Rafal, R. D., & Posner, M. I. (1987). Deficits in human visual spatial attention following thalamic lesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 84, 7349-7353.
154. Rafal, R. D., & Robertson, I. (1995). The neurology of visual attention. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 625-648). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
155. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
156. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1983). The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 21, 589-599.
157. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Perceptual and action Systems in unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 151-182). Amsterdam: North Holland.
158. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Burroughs, E., Luckhurst, L., Bateman, A., & Hill, S. (1995a). Cueing in a case of neglect - modality and automaticity effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 605-621.
159. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Burroughs, E., Luckhurst, L., Bateman, A., & Hill, S. (1995b). "Paradoxical neglect": Spatial representations, hemisphere-specific activation and spatial cueing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 569-604.
160. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Cleton, P., & Fery, P. (1990). Interaction of attentional and lexical processes in neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 479-518.
161. Roberston, I., & Marshall, J. C. (1993). Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies. London: Psychology Press.
162. Robertson, I., North, N., & Geggie, C. (1992). Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral neglect: Three single case studies of its therapeutic effectiveness. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 55, 799-805.
163. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
164. Schvaneveldt, R. W., & McDonald, J. E. (1981). Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 673-687.
165. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
166. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
167. Shuren, J. E., Jacobs, D. H., & Heilman, K. M. (1997). The influence of center of mass effect on the distribution of spatial attention in the vertical and horizontal dimensions. Brain and Cognition, 34, 293-300.
168. Sieroff, E., Pollatsek, A., & Posner, M. I. (1988). Recognition of visual letter strings following injury to the posterior visual spatial attention system. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 427-449.
169. Tanaka, K. (1993, October 29). Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Science, 262, 685-688.
170. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vision Research, 34, 179-189.
171. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1998). On the time course of exogenous cueing effects: A response to Lupianez and Weaver. Vision Research, 38, 1625-1628.
172. Tipper, S. P. (2001, May). Frames of references in attention. Paper presented at the South Carolina Symposium on Attention, Columbia, SC.
173. Tipper, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1261-1278.
174. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-299.
175. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H., & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 50-60.
176. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
177. Treisman, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B353, 1295-1306.
178. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
179. Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
180. Treisman, A., & Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention, and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-31.
181. Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S. M., Wai, W. Y. K., Lai, Y., Davis, N., & Nuflo, F. (1995). Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78, 507-545.
182. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. I. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Manfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
183. Usher, M., & Niebur, E. (1996). A neural model for parallel, expectation-driven attention for objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 305-321.
184. Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
185. Walker, R. (1995). Spatial and object-based neglect. Neurocase, 1, 371-383.
186. Ward, R., & Goodrich, S. (1996). Differences between objects and non-objects in visual extinction: A competition for attention. Psychological Science, 7, 177-180.
187. Ward, R., Goodrich, S., & Driver, J. (1994). Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection. Visual Cognition, 1, 101-130.
188. Wolfe, J. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
189. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D. J., & Welch, J. (1992). Neglect and visual recognition. Brain, 112, 51-71.
190. Young, A. W., Newcombe, F., & Ellis, A. W. (1991). Different impairments contribute to neglect dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 177-192.
191. Zipser, D., & Andersen, R. A. (1988, February 25). A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of posterior parietal neurons. Nature, 331, 679-684.