The preview benefit: Visual marking, feature-based inhibition, temporal segregation, or onset capture?

Visual Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 4-8, 2006, Pages 736-748

  Donk, Mieke ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUMINANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL SUMMATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33745835479     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280500193230     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Atchley, P. and Jones, S. E. and Hoffman, L. (2003) Visual marking: A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp. 667-677.
2. Belopolsky, A. V., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A. F.(2005). Prioritization by visual transients in search: Evidence against the visual marking account of the preview benefit. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 93-99.
3. Braithwaite, J. J. and Humphreys, G. W. (2003) Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search Perception and Psychophysics, 65, pp. 213-237.
4. Braithwaite, J. J. and Humphreys, G. W. and Hodsoll, J. (2003) Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 758-778.
5. Donk, M. (2006). Prioritizing selection of new elements: On the time-course of the preview effect. Visual Cognition, 12, 1373-1385.
6. Donk, M. and Theeuwes, J. (2001) Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets Perception and Psychophysics, 63, pp. 891-900.
7. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J.(2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 1231-1242.
8. Donk, M., & Verburg, R. C.(2004)Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 282-288.
9. Duncan, J. and Ward, R. and Shapiro, K. (1994) Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision Nature, 369, pp. 313-315.
10. Egeth, H. E. and Virzi, R. A. and Garbart, H. (1984) Searching for conjunctively defined targets Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, pp. 32-39.
11. Humphreys, G. W., Jung-Stalmann, B., & Olivers, C. 2004. An analysis of the time-course of visual marking using a probe dot procedure Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 713-730.
12. Humphreys, G. W. and Watson, D. G. and Jolicoeur, P. (2002) Fractionating the preview benefit in search: Dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp. 640-660.
13. Jiang, Y. and Chun, M. M. and Marks, L. E. (2002a) Visual marking: Dissociating effects of new and old set size Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp. 293-302.
14. Jiang, Y. and Chun, M. M. and Marks, L. E. (2002b) Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp. 717-730.
15. Jonides, J. and Yantis, S. (1988) Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention Perception and Psychophysics, 43, pp. 346-354.
16. Kahneman, D. and Treisman, A. and Burkell, J. (1983) The cost of visual filtering Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, pp. 510-522.
17. Kaptein, N. A. and Theeuwes, J. and van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995) Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color defined subset of elements Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, pp. 1053-1069.
18. Kunar, M. A. and Humphreys, G. W. and Smith, K. J. (2003a) Visual change with moving displays: More evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 779-792.
19. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Hulleman, J. (2003b). What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Kunar, M. A. and Humphreys, G. W. and Smith, K. J. and Watson, D. G. (2003c) When a reappearance is old news: Visual marking survives occlusion Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 185-198.
21. Olivers, C. N. L. and Humphreys, G. W. (2002) When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited-capacity inhibition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, pp. 22-42.
22. Olivers, C. N. L. and Humphreys, G. W. (2003) Visual marking inhibits singleton capture Cognitive Psychology, 47, pp. 1-42.
23. Olivers, C. N. L. and Humphreys, G. W. and Braithwaite, J. J. (2006) The preview search task: Evidence for visual marking Visual Cognition, 14, pp. 716-735.
24. Olivers, C. N. L. and Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1999) Visual marking of locations versus feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, pp. 679-715.
25. Theeuwes, J. (1991) Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets Perception and Psychophysics, 49, pp. 83-90.
26. Theeuwes, J. (1994) Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, pp. 799-806.
27. Theeuwes, J. and Kramer, A. F. and Atchley, P. (1998) Visual marking of old objects Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, pp. 130-134.
28. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1997) Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects Psychological Review, 104, pp. 90-122.
29. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1998) Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature based attentional inhibition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 946-962.
30. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (2000) Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 471-481.
31. Yantis, S. and Hillstrom, A. P. (1994) Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, pp. 95-107.
32. Yantis, S. and Johnson, D. N. (1990) Mechanisms of attentional priority Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, pp. 812-825.
33. Yantis, S. and Jones, E. (1991) Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags Perception and Psychophysics, 50, pp. 166-178.
34. Yantis, S. and Jonides, J. (1984) Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, pp. 601-621.
35. Yantis, S. and Jonides, J. (1990) Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, pp. 121-134.