Altered vision near the hands

Cognition

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1035-1047

  Abrams, Richard A ^a   Davoli, Christopher C ^a   Du, Feng ^a   Knapp III, William H ^a   Paull, Daniel ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Attention; Inhibition of return; Reaching; Vision; Visual attention; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; HAND; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; REACTION TIME; VISION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 42249091913     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Castel A.D., Chasteen A.C., Scialfa C.T., and Pratt J. Adult age difference in the time course of inhibition of return. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 58B (2003) 256-259
2. diPellegrino G., and Frassinetti F. Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand. Current Biology 10 (2000) 1475-1477
3. Duncan J., Ward R., and Shapiro K. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature 369 (1994) 313-315
4. Graziano M. Is reaching eye-centered, body-centered, hand-centered, or a combination?. Reviews in the Neurosciences 12 (2001) 175-185
5. Graziano M., and Cooke D. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 845-859
6. Klein R. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature 334 (1988) 430-431
7. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 138-147
8. Klein R.M., and MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 346-352
9. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., and Zohary E. Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience 27 (2007) 731-740
10. Poliakoff E., Miles E., Li X., and Blanchette I. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch. Cognition 102 (2007) 405-414
11. Posner M.I., Nissen M.J., and Ogden W.C. Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In: Pick H.L., and Saltzman I.J. (Eds). Modes of perceiving and processing information (1978), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
12. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L.S., and Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2 (1985) 211-228
13. Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., and Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 18 (1992) 849-860
14. Reed C.L., Grubb J.D., and Steele C. Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 32 (2006) 166-177
15. Schendel K., and Robertson L.C. Reaching out to see: Arm position can attenuate human visual loss. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (2004) 935-943
16. Shaprio K.L., Arnell K.M., and Raymond J.E. The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1997) 291-296
17. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Jerreat L.M., and Burak A.L. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 20 (1994) 478-499
18. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
19. Wolfe J. What can one million trials tell us about visual search?. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 33-39
20. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3 (2, Whole No.13).