What you see is what you need

Journal of Vision

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 86-94

  Triesch, Jochen ^a   Ballard, Dana H ^b   Hayhoe, Mary M ^c   Sullivan, Brian T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Rochester   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Change blindness; Eye movements; Inattentional blindness; Virtual reality; Visual cognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; EYELID REFLEX; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OBSERVER VARIATION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; ATTENTION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; MEMORY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MEMORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037500052     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/3.1.9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory Representations in natural tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66-80.
2. Hayhoe, M. M. (2000). Vision using routines: A functional account of vision. Visual Cognition, 7, 43-64.
3. Hayhoe, M. M., Bensinger, D. G., & Ballard, D. H. (1998). Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision Research, 38, 125-137.
4. Henderson, J., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438-443.
5. Intraub, H. (1997). The representation of visual scenes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 217-221.
6. Irwin, D. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 94-100.
7. Irwin, D., & Gordon, R. (1998). Eye movements, attention, and trans-saccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127-155.
8. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness, MIT Press.
9. O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191-211.
10. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of "mud-splashes". Nature, 398, 34.
11. Pelz, J. B., Hayhoe, M. M., Ballard, D. H., Shrivastava, A., Bayliss, J. D., & von der Heyde, M. (1999). Development of a virtual laboratory for the study of complex human behavior. The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality, SPIE Proceedings, 3639B.
12. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
13. Roelfsema, P., Lamme, V., & Spekreijse, H. (2000). The implementation of visual routines. Vision Research, 40, 1385-1411.
14. Shinoda, H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Shrivastava, A. (2001). What controls attention in natural environments. Vision Research, 41, 3535-3545.
15. Simons, D. J. (2000a). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 147-155.
16. Simons, D. J. (2000b). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.
17. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D.T., (1997). Change Blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
18. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D.T., (1998). Failure to detect changes to people in a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
19. Ullman, S. (1984). Visual Routines. Cognition, 18, 97-157.
20. Von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H., (Eds.). (2000). Perception and Action in Virtual Environments. Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
21. Wallis, G., & Bülthoff, H. H., (2000). What's scene and not seen: Influences of movement and task upon what we see. Visual Cognition, 7, 175-190.