Priming from the attentional blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 95-100

  Shapiro, Kimron ^a,b   Driver, Jon ^c   Ward, Robert ^a   Sorensen, Robyn E ^c  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142082244     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00689.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Broadbent, D.E., & Broadbent, M.H.P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
2. Chun, M.M., & Potter, M.C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.
3. Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K.L. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
4. Kanwisher, N.G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
5. Kanwisher, N.G., & Potter, M.C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
6. Luck, S.J., Vogel, E.K., & Shapiro, K.L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 382, 616-618.
7. Maki, W.S., Frigen, K., & Paulson, K. (in press). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
8. Maki, W.S., & Padmanabhan, G. (1994). Transient suppression of processing during rapid serial visual presentation: Acquired distinctiveness of probes modulates the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 499-504.
9. Monsell, S. (1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465-501.
10. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instruction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56-60.
11. Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.S., & Arnell, K.M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
12. Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.S., & Arnell, K.M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 653-662.
13. Shapiro, K.L., Caldwell, J.I., & Sorensen, R.E. (in press). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual "cocktail party" effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
14. Shapiro, K.L., & Raymond, J.E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151-188). New York: Academic Press.
15. Shapiro, K.L., Raymond, J.E., & Arnell, K.M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357-371.
16. Shelton, J.R., & Martin, R.C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1191-1210.
17. Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778-780.