A Theory of Eye Movements During Target Acquisition

Psychological Review

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 787-835

  Zelinsky, Gregory J ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

center of gravity fixations; computational models; overt visual search; population coding; saccade target selection

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RETINA; REVIEW; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EYE MOVEMENTS; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; RETINA; SACCADES; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 56149083701     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013118     Document Type: Article

References (268)

1. Aks D., and Enns J. Visual search for size is influenced by a background texture gradient. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 1467-1481
2. Allport D.A. Attention and performance. In: Claxton G. (Ed). Cognitive psychology (1980), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 112-153
3. Allport D.A. Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In: Heuer H., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Perspectives on perception and action (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 395-419
4. Alvarez G.A., and Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 106-111
5. Anderson J.A., and Rosenfeld E. Neurocomputing: Foundations of research (1988), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Anderson J.A., Silverstein J.W., Ritz S.A., and Jones R.S. Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 413-451
7. Behrmann M., Watt S., Black S., and Barton J. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: An oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 1445-1458
8. Belongie S., Malik J., and Puzicha J. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24 (2002) 509-522
9. Bertera J., and Rayner K. Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 576-585
10. Bichot N.P., Rossi A.F., and Desimone R. Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science 308 (2005, April 22) 529-534
11. Biederman I. Visual object recognition. In: Kosslyn S., and Osherson D. (Eds). An invitation to cognitive science. 2nd ed. (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 121-165
12. Biederman I., Blickle T.W., Teitelbaum R.C., and Klatsky G.J. Object search in nonscene displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (1988) 456-467
13. Biederman I., Glass A.L., and Stacy E.W. Searching for objects in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1973) 22-27
14. Bouma H. Visual search and reading: Eye movements and functional visual field-A tutorial review. In: Requin J. (Ed). Attention and performance VII (1978), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 115-146
15. Bourne L. Knowing and using concepts. Psychological Review 77 (1970) 546-556
16. Boynton R. Visual search techniques (NAS-NRC Publication No. 712) (1960), National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington, DC
17. Brefczynski J., and DeYoe E. A physiological correlate of the "spotlight" of visual attention. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 370-374
18. Brockmole J.R., and Henderson J.M. Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition 13 (2006) 99-108
19. Bülthoff H., and Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89 (1992) 60-64
20. Bundesen C. Visual selection of features and objects: Is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen's (1985) findings. Perception & Psychophysics 50 (1991) 87-89
21. Burt P.J., and Adelson E.H. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transactions on Communications 31 (1983) 532-540
22. Buswell G.T. How people look at pictures (1935), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
23. Carrasco M., and Frieder K. Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research 37 (1997) 63-82
24. Carrasco M., and Yeshurun Y. The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 673-692
25. Chelazzi L., Miller E., Duncan J., and Desimone R. Responses of neurons in macaque area V4 during memory-guided visual search. Cerebral Cortex 11 (2001) 761-772
26. Chen X., and Zelinsky G.J. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Research 46 (2006) 4118-4133
27. Chun M., and Wolfe J. Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?. Cognitive Psychology 30 (1996) 39-70
28. Churchland P.S., and Sejnowski T.J. The computational brain (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
29. Coeffe C., and O'Regan J.K. Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects. Vision Research 27 (1987) 227-240
30. Daugman J. Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vision Research 20 (1980) 847-856
31. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18 (1995) 193-222
32. Deubel H., and Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 36 (1996) 1827-1837
33. Dickinson C.A., and Zelinsky G.J. Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 1120-1126
34. Dickinson C.A., and Zelinsky G.J. Memory for the search path: Evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history. Vision Research 47 (2007) 1745-1755
35. Dosher B.A., and Lu Z.-L. Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1269-1292
36. Dosher B.A., and Lu Z.-L. Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 139-146
37. Downing C., and Pinker S. The spatial structure of visual attention. In: Posner M.I., and Marin O.S. (Eds). Attention and performance XI (1985), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 171-187
38. Duncan J., and Humphreys G. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96 (1989) 433-458
39. Eckstein M.P. The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 111-118
40. Eckstein M.P., Beutter B.R., Pham B.T., Shimozaki S.S., and Stone L.S. Similar neural representations of the target for saccades and perception during search. Journal of Neuroscience 27 (2007) 1266-1270
41. Eckstein M.P., Beutter B.R., and Stone L.S. Quantifying the performance limits of human saccadic targeting during visual search. Perception 30 (2001) 1389-1401
42. Eckstein M.P., Drescher B., and Shimozaki S.S. Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 973-980
43. Egeth H.E., and Yantis S. Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology 48 (1997) 269-297
44. Elman J.L. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14 (1990) 179-211
45. Engbert R., Nuthmann A., Richter E.M., and Kliegl R. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review 112 (2005) 777-813
46. Engel F. Visual conspicuity, directed attention and retinal locus. Vision Research 11 (1971) 563-576
47. Engel F. Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye. Vision Research 17 (1977) 95-108
48. Enns J.T., and Rensink R.A. Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science 247 (1990, February 9) 721-723
49. Enns J.T., and Rensink R.A. Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review 98 (1991) 335-351
50. Eriksen C., and St. James J. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics 40 (1986) 225-240
51. Findlay J.M. Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research 22 (1982) 1033-1045
52. Findlay J.M. Visual computation and saccadic eye movements: A theoretical perspective. Spatial Vision 2 (1987) 175-189
53. Findlay J.M. Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research 37 (1997) 617-631
54. Findlay J.M. Eye scanning and visual search. In: Henderson J.M., and Ferreira F. (Eds). The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (2004), Psychology Press, New York 135-159
55. Findlay J.M. Covert attention and saccadic eye movements. In: Itti L., Rees G., and Tsotsos J. (Eds). Neurobiology of attention (2005), Elsevier, Amsterdam 114-116
56. Findlay J.M., and Brown V. Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I. Scanpath planning. Vision Research 46 (2006) 179-195
57. Findlay J.M., and Brown V. Eye scanning of multi-element displays: II. Saccade planning. Vision Research 46 (2006) 216-227
58. Findlay J.M., and Gilchrist I.D. Eye guidance and visual search. In: Underwood G. (Ed). Eye guidance in reading, driving and scene perception (1998), Elsevier, Oxford, England 295-312
59. Findlay J.M., and Gilchrist I.D. Visual attention: The active vision perspective. In: Jenkins M., and Harris L. (Eds). Vision and attention (2001), Springer, New York 85-105
60. Findlay J.M., and Gilchrist I.D. Active vision (2003), Oxford University Press, New York
61. Findlay J.M., and Walker R. A model of saccadic eye movement generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 661-721
62. Folk C.L., and Remington R.W. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 847-858
63. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., and Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 1030-1044
64. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., and Wright J.H. The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 317-329
65. Frintrop S., Backer G., and Rome E. Goal-directed search with a top-down modulated computational system. In: Kropatsch W., Sablantnig R., and Hanbury A. (Eds). Pattern recognition: Proceedings of the 27th DAGM Symposium (2005), Springer, New York 117-124
66. Geisler W.S., and Chou K. Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: Visual search. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 356-378
67. Geisler W.S., and Perry J.S. A real-time foveated multiresolution system for low-bandwidth video communication. In: Rogowitz B.E., and Pappas T.N. (Eds). Human vision and electronic imaging III (1998), SPIE, Bellingham, WA 294-305
68. Geisler W.S., and Perry J.S. Real-time simulation of arbitrary visual fields. In: Duchowski A.T. (Ed). Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium: Proceedings ETRA 2002 (2002), Association for Computing Machinery, New York 83-87
69. Geisler W.S., Perry J.S., and Najemnik J. Visual search: The role of peripheral information measured using gaze-contingent displays. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 858-873
70. Godijn R., and Theeuwes J. Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 1039-1054
71. Goldsmith M. What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2 (1998) 189-219
72. Gould J. Eye movements during visual search and memory search. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1973) 184-195
73. Graham N., Kramer P., and Yager D. Signal-detection models for multidimensional stimuli: Probability distributions and combination rules. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 31 (1987) 366-409
74. Green D., and Swets J. Signal detection theory and psychophysics (1966), Krieger, New York
75. Hamker F.H. Modeling feature-based attention as an active top-down inference process. BioSystems 86 (2006) 91-99
76. Hausser M., and Mel B. Dendrites: Bug or feature?. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13 (2003) 372-383
77. Hayhoe M. Visual routines: A functional account of vision. Visual Cognition 7 (2000) 43-64
78. He P., and Kowler E. The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for "center-of-gravity" tendencies. Vision Research 29 (1989) 1165-1181
79. He Z.J., and Nakayama K. Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature 359 (1992, September 17) 231-233
80. Henderson J.M. Visual attention and saccadic eye movements. In: d'Ydewalle G., and van Rensbergen J. (Eds). Perception and cognition: Advances in eye-movement research (1993), North-Holland, Amsterdam 37-50
81. Henderson J.M. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 498-504
82. Henderson J.M., Brockmole J.R., Castelhano M.S., and Mack M.L. Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In: van Gompel R., Fischer M., Murray W., and Hill R.W. (Eds). Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (2007), Elsevier, Amsterdam 537-562
83. Henderson J.M., and Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1999) 243-271
84. Henderson J.M., Pollatsek A., and Rayner K. Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Perception & Psychophysics 45 (1989) 196-208
85. Henderson J.M., Weeks P., and Hollingworth A. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 210-228
86. Hodgson T., and Müller H. Evidence relating to premotor theories of visuospatial attention. In: Findlay J., Walker R., and Kentridge R. (Eds). Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (1995), North-Holland, Amsterdam 305-316
87. Hoffman J.E. Visual attention and eye movements. In: Pashler H. (Ed). Attention (1998), University College London Press, London 119-153
88. Hoffman J.E., and Subramaniam B. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics 57 (1995) 787-795
89. Hollingworth A., and Henderson J.M. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 113-136
90. Hooge I., and Erkelens C. Peripheral vision and oculomotor control during visual search. Vision Research 39 (1999) 1567-1575
91. Hooge I., Over E., van Wezel R., and Frens M. Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1901-1908
92. Horowitz T.S., and Wolfe J.M. Memory for rejected distractors in visual search?. Visual Cognition 10 (2003) 257-287
93. Hubel D., and Wiesel T. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 160 (1962) 106-154
94. Humphreys G., and Müller H. SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology 25 (1993) 43-110
95. Hurvich L. Color vision (1981), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
96. Irwin D.E. Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science 5 (1996) 94-99
97. Irwin D.E., and Andrews R. Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In: McClelland J., and Inui T. (Eds). Attention and performance XVI (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 122-155
98. Irwin D.E., and Gordon R.D. Eye movements, attention, and transsaccadic memory. Visual Cognition 5 (1998) 127-155
99. Irwin D.E., and Zelinsky G.J. Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 882-895
100. Itti L. Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes. Vision Cognition 12 (2005) 1093-1123
101. Itti L., and Koch C. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1489-1506
102. Itti L., and Koch C. Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2 (2001) 194-203
103. Jacobs A. Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control?. Perception & Psychophysics 39 (1986) 47-58
104. Julesz B. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature 290 (1981, March 12) 91-97
105. Kahneman D. Attention and effort (1973), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
106. Kanerva P. Sparse distributed memory (1988), Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA
107. Kaufman L., and Richards W. "Center-of-gravity" tendencies for fixations and flow patterns. Perception & Psychophysics 5 (1969) 81-85
108. Kaufman L., and Richards W. Spontaneous fixation tendencies for visual forms. Perception & Psychophysics 5 (1969) 85-88
109. Klein R.M. Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention?. In: Nickerson R.S. (Ed). Attention and performance VIII (1980), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 259-276
110. Klein R.M. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature 334 (1988, August 4) 430-431
111. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science 4 (2000) 138-147
112. Klein R.M., and Farrell M. Search performance without eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics 46 (1989) 476-482
113. Klein R.M., and MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 346-352
114. Klein R.M., and Pontefract A. Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? Revisited!. In: Umilta C., and Moskovitch M. (Eds). Attention and performance XV (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 333-350
115. Koch C., and Ullman S. Shift in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology 4 (1985) 219-227
116. Kowler E., Anderson E., Dosher B., and Blaser E. The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research 35 (1995) 1897-1916
117. Kustov A., and Robinson D.L. Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements. Nature 384 (1996, November 7) 74-77
118. Lades M., Vorbruggen J., Buhmann J., Lange J., von der Malsburg C., Wurtz R., and Konen W. Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers 42 (1993) 300-311
119. Landy M., and Movshon A. Computational models of visual processing (1991), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
120. Lee C., Rohrer W., and Sparks D. Population coding of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus. Nature 332 (1988, March 24) 357-360
121. Leung T., and Malik J. Representing and recognizing the visual appearance of materials using three-dimensional textons. International Journal of Computer Vision 43 (2001) 29-44
122. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., and Aitsebaomo A.P. Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research 25 (1985) 963-977
123. Levin D.T. Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 1364-1382
124. Levin D.T., Takarae Y., Miner A., and Keil F.C. Efficient visual search by category: Specifying the features that mark the difference between artifacts and animals in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 676-697
125. Loftus G. Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Psychology 3 (1972) 525-551
126. Logan G. The automaticity of academic life: Unconscious applications of an implicit theory. In: Wyer R.S. (Ed). Advances in social cognition 10 (1997), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 157-179
127. Lu Z.-L., and Dosher B.A. External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Research 38 (1998) 1183-1198
128. Lu Z.-L., and Dosher B.A. Spatial attention: Different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1534-1548
129. Luck S.J., and Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390 (1997, November 20) 279-281
130. Malik J., and Perona P. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America 7 A (1990) 923-932
131. Mannan S., Ruddock K., and Wooding D. Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-d images. Spatial Vision 9 (1995) 363-386
132. Maylor E.A., and Hockey R. Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985) 777-787
133. McCarley J.S., Kramer A.F., Wickens C.D., Vidoni E.D., and Boot W.R. Visual skills in airport security screening. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 302-306
134. McConkie G., and Rayner K. Identifying the span of the effective stimulus in reading: Literature review and theories of reading. In: Singer H., and Ruddell R.B. (Eds). Theoretical models and processes of reading. 2nd ed. (1976), International Reading Association, Newark, DE 137-162
135. McIlwain J.T. Visual receptive fields and their images in superior colliculus of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 38 (1975) 219-230
136. McIlwain J.T. Lateral spread of neural excitation during microstimulation in intermediate gray layer of cat's superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 47 (1982) 167-178
137. McIlwain J.T. Distributed spatial coding in the superior colliculus: A review. Visual Neuroscience 6 (1991) 3-13
138. Medin D., Goldstone R., and Gentner D. Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgments of similarity and difference are not inverses. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 64-69
139. Medin D., Goldstone R., and Gentner D. Respects for similarity. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 254-278
140. Mel B.W. The sigma-pi column: A model of associative learning in cerebral neocortex (Computation and Neural Systems Memo No. 6) (1990), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
141. Motter B.C., and Belky E.J. The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research 38 (1998) 1805-1815
142. Motter B.C., and Holsapple J. Saccades and covert shifts of attention during active visual search: Spatial distributions, memory, and items per fixation. Vision Research 47 (2007) 1261-1281
143. Motter B.C., and Simoni D.A. The roles of cortical image separation and size in active visual search performance. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 1-15
144. Müller H.J., and von Mühlenen A. Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics 58 (1996) 224-249
145. Murthy A., Thompson K.G., and Schall J.D. Dynamic dissociation of visual selection from saccade programming in frontal eye field. Journal of Neurophysiology 86 (2001) 2634-2637
146. Najemnik J., and Geisler W.S. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature 434 (2005, March 17) 387-391
147. Navalpakkam V., and Itti L. Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research 45 (2005) 205-231
148. Neider M.B., and Zelinsky G.J. Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research 46 (2006) 614-621
149. Neider M.B., and Zelinsky G.J. Searching for camouflaged targets: Effects of target-background similarity on visual search. Vision Research 46 (2006) 2217-2235
150. Neuman O. Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In: Heuer H., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Perspectives on perception and action (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 361-394
151. Newell F.N., Brown V., and Findlay J.M. Is object search mediated by object-based or image-based representations. Spatial Vision 17 (2004) 511-541
152. Nickerson R. Short term memory for complex meaningful visual material. Canadian Journal of Psychology 19 (1965) 155-160
153. Nickerson R. A note on long term recognition memory for pictorial material. Psychonomic Science 11 (1968) 58
154. Nobre A.C., Sebestyen G.N., Gitelman D.R., Frith C.D., and Mesulam M.M. Filtering of distractors during visual search studied by positron emission tomography. NeuroImage 16 (2002) 968-976
155. Norman D., and Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davison R., Shwartz G., and Shapiro D. (Eds). Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory (1986), Plenum Press, New York 1-18
156. Noton D., and Stark L. Scan paths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision Research 11 (1971) 929-942
157. Oliva A., Torralba A., Castelhano M., and Henderson J.M. Top-down control of visual attention in object detection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing 1 (2003), IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA 253-256
158. Oliva A., Wolfe J.M., and Arsenio H. Panoramic search: The interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 1132-1146
159. Olshausen B., Anderson C., and van Essen D. A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. Journal of Neuroscience 13 (1993) 4700-4719
160. Olshausen B., and Field D. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381 (1996, June 13) 607-609
161. Ottes F.P., Van Gisbergen J.A.M., and Eggermont J.J. Latency dependence of colour-based target vs. nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system. Vision Research 25 (1985) 849-862
162. Palmer J. Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research 34 (1994) 1703-1721
163. Palmer J. Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science 4 (1995) 118-123
164. Palmer J., Ames C., and Lindsey D. Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 108-130
165. Palmer J., Verghese P., and Pavel M. The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1227-1268
166. Palmer S.T. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition 3 (1975) 519-526
167. Parkhurst D.J., Law K., and Niebur E. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual selective attention. Vision Research 42 (2002) 107-123
168. Perry J.S., and Geisler W.S. Gaze-contingent real-time simulation of arbitrary visual fields. In: Rogowitz B.E., and Pappas T.N. (Eds). Human vision and electronic imaging VII (2002), SPIE, Bellingham, WA 294-305
169. Poggio T.A., and Hurlbert A. Observations on cortical mechanisms for object recognition and learning. In: Koch C., and Davis J.L. (Eds). Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 153-182
170. Pomplun M. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1886-1900
171. Pomplun M., Reingold E.M., and Shen J. Area activation: A computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 299-312
172. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1980) 3-25
173. Posner M.I., and Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H., and Bouwhuis D.G. (Eds). Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 531-556
174. Posner M.I., Nissen M., and Ogden W. Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In: Pick N., and Saltzman I. (Eds). Modes of perceiving and processing information (1978), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 137-157
175. Posner M.I., Snyder C., and Davidson B. Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (1980) 160-174
176. Rao R., Zelinsky G., Hayhoe M., and Ballard D. Modeling saccadic targeting in visual search. In: Touretzky D., Mozer M., and Hasselmo M. (Eds). Advances in neural information processing systems 8 (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 830-836
177. Rao R., Zelinsky G., Hayhoe M., and Ballard D. Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research 42 (2002) 1447-1463
178. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin 85 (1978) 618-660
179. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998) 372-422
180. Rayner K., McConkie G., and Ehrlich S. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4 (1978) 529-544
181. Reichle E.D., and Laurent P.A. Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of "intelligent" eye-movement behavior during reading. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 390-408
182. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., and Pollatsek A. The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2003) 445-476
183. Reilly R.G., and O'Regan J.K. Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research 38 (1998) 303-317
184. Rensink R., O'Regan K., and Clark J. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 368-373
185. Reynolds J.H., and Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27 (2004) 611-647
186. Rohaly A., Ahumada A., and Watson A. Object detection in natural backgrounds predicted by discrimination performance and models. Vision Research 37 (1997) 3225-3235
187. Rosch E. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4 (1973) 328-350
188. Rumelhart D., and McClelland J. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
189. Rutishauser U., and Koch C. Probabilistic modeling of eye movement data during conjunction search via feature-based attention. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 1-20
190. Sagi D., and Julesz B. "Where and "what" in vision. Science 228 (1985, June 7) 1217-1219
191. Samuel A.G., and Weiner S.K. Attentional consequences of object appearance and disappearance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1433-1451
192. Schall J.D., and Thompson K.G. Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience 22 (1999) 241-259
193. Scialfa C., and Joffe K. Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity. Perception & Psychophysics 60 (1998) 1067-1082
194. Scinto L., Pillalamarri R., and Karsh R. Cognitive strategies for visual search. Acta Psychologica 62 (1986) 263-292
195. Sejnowski T.J. Neural populations revealed. Nature 332 (1988, March 24) 308
196. Shapley R. Visual sensitivity and parallel retino-cortical channels. Annual Review of Psychology 41 (1990) 635-658
197. Shaw M. Attending to multiple sources of information. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 353-409
198. Sheinberg D.L., and Logothetis N.K. Noticing familiar object in real world scenes: The role of temporal cortical neurons in natural vision. Journal of Neuroscience 21 (2001) 1340-1350
199. Sheliga B., Riggio L., and Rizzolatti G. Orienting of attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research 98 (1994) 507-522
200. Shepard R. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6 (1967) 156-163
201. Shepherd M., Findlay J., and Hockey R. The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 A (1986) 475-491
202. Shiu L., and Pashler H. Negligible effect of spatial precueing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 1037-1054
203. Simons D., and Levin D. Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1997) 261-267
204. Simons D., and Levin D. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 644-649
205. Sparks D.L., Kristan W.B., and Shaw B.K. The role of population coding in the control of movement. In: Stein P.S.G., Grillner S., Selverston A.I., and Stuart D.G. (Eds). Neurons, networks, and motor behavior (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 21-32
206. Sperling G.S., and Weichselgartner E. Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 503-532
207. Stampe D.M. Heuristic filtering and reliable calibration methods for video-based pupil-tracking systems. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25 (1993) 137-142
208. Standing L. Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (1973) 207-222
209. Swensson R., and Judy P. Detection of noisy targets: Models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio. Perception & Psychophysics 29 (1981) 521-534
210. Tarr M., and Bülthoff H. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 1494-1505
211. Tarr M., and Bülthoff H. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. Cognition 67 (1998) 1-20
212. Tatler B.W., Baddeley R.J., and Gilchrist I.D. Visual correlates of fixation selection: Effects of scale and time. Vision Research 45 (2005) 643-659
213. Theeuwes J. Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics 49 (1991) 83-90
214. Theeuwes J. Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 799-806
215. Theeuwes J. Top down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 65-70
216. Theeuwes J., Kramer A., Hahn S., Irwin D., and Zelinsky G.J. Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1595-1608
217. Thorpe S., Fize D., and Marlot C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381 (1996, June 6) 520-522
218. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Jerreat L.M., and Burak A.L. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 478-499
219. Toet A., Bijl P., Kooi F.L., and Valeton J.M. A high-resolution image dataset for testing search and detection models (1998), TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, the Netherlands
220. Toet A., Kooi F.L., Bijl P., and Valeton J.M. Visual conspicuity determines human target acquisition performance. Optical Engineering 37 (1998) 1969-1975
221. Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M., and Henderson J.M. Contextual guidance of attention in natural scenes: The role of global features on object search. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 766-786
222. Townsend J. Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 14 (1976) 219-238
223. Townsend J. Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 46-54
224. Trappenberg T.P., Dorris M.C., Munoz D.P., and Klein R.M. A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13 (2001) 256-271
225. Treisman A. Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 A (1988) 201-237
226. Treisman A. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 652-676
227. Treisman A., and Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 (1990) 459-478
228. Treisman A., and Souther J. Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114 (1985) 285-310
229. Treisman A.M., and Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
230. Treisman A.M., and Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 14-48
231. Tsotsos J., Culhane S., Wai W., Lai Y., Davis N., and Nuflo F. Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence 78 (1995) 507-545
232. Ullman S. Visual routines. Cognition 18 (1984) 97-159
233. Underwood G., and Foulsham T. Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (2006) 1931-1945
234. Van Opstal A.J., and Van Gisbergen J.A.M. A nonlinear model for collicular spatial interactions underlying the metrical properties of electrically elicited saccades. Biological Cybernetics 60 (1989) 171-183
235. Van Zoest W., Donk M., and Theeuwes J. The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 746-759
236. Viola P., Jones M.J., and Snow D. Detecting pedestrians using patterns of motion and appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision 63 (2005) 153-161
237. Viviani P. Eye movements in visual search: Cognitive, perceptual and motor control aspects. In: Kowler E. (Ed). Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (1990), Elsevier, Amsterdam 353-393
238. Ward R., Duncan J., and Shapiro K. The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology 30 (1996) 79-109
239. Williams D., Reingold E., Moscovitch M., and Behrmann M. Patterns of eye movements during parallel and serial visual search tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (1997) 151-164
240. Williams L.G. The effect of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 1 (1966) 315-318
241. Wolfe J.M. Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 (1994) 202-238
242. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. In: Pashler H. (Ed). Attention (1998), University College London Press, London 13-71
243. Wolfe J.M. What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 33-39
244. Wolfe J.M., Alvarez G.A., and Horowitz T.S. Attention is fast but volition is slow. Nature 406 (2000, August 17) 691
245. Wolfe J.M., Cave K., and Franzel S. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 419-433
246. Wolfe J.M., Friedman-Hill S., Stewart M., and O'Connell K. The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 34-49
247. Wolfe J.M., and Gancarz G. Guided Search 3.0. In: Lakshminarayanan V. (Ed). Basic and clinical applications of vision science (1996), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands 189-192
248. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Kenner N., Hyle M., and Vasan N. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1411-1426
249. Wolfe J.M., Oliva A., Horowitz T.S., Butcher S.J., and Bompas A. Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2985-3004
250. Yamada K., and Cottrell G. A model of scan paths applied to face recognition. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 55-60
251. Yang H., and Zelinsky G.J. Evidence for guidance in categorical visual search. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 449a
252. Yantis S. Goal directed and stimulus driven determinants of attentional control. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Attention and performance XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 73-103
253. Yantis S., and Hillstrom A. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 95-107
254. Yantis S., and Jonides J. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 1505-1513
255. Yeshurun Y., and Carrasco M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature 396 (1998, November 5) 72-75
256. Zelinsky G.J. Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research 36 (1996) 2177-2187
257. Zelinsky G.J. Precueing target location in a variable set size "nonsearch" task: Dissociating search-based and interference-based explanations for set size effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 875-903
258. Zelinsky G.J. Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 209-225
259. Zelinsky G.J. Detecting changes between real-world objects using spatiochromatic filters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (2003) 533-555
260. Zelinsky G.J. The BOLAR theory of eye movements during visual search. Abstracts of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 10 (2005), Psychonomic Society, Austin, TX 23
261. Zelinsky G.J. Specifying the components of attention in a visual search task. In: Itti L., Rees G., and Tsotsos J. (Eds). Neurobiology of attention (2005), Elsevier, Amsterdam 395-400
262. Zelinsky G.J., and Loschky L.C. Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics 67 (2005) 676-690
263. Zelinsky G.J., Rao R., Hayhoe M., and Ballard D. Eye movements reveal the spatio-temporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 448-453
264. Zelinsky G.J., and Sheinberg D. Why some search tasks take longer than others: Using eye movements to redefine reaction times. In: Findlay J., Kentridge R., and Walker R. (Eds). Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (1995), Elsevier, Amsterdam 325-336
265. Zelinsky G.J., and Sheinberg D. Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 244-262
266. Zelinsky G.J., Zhang W., Yu B., Chen X., and Samaras D. The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in guiding eye movements during visual search. In: Weiss Y., Scholkopf B., and Platt J. (Eds). Advances in neural information processing systems 18 (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1569-1576
267. Zhang W., Yang H., Samaras D., and Zelinsky G.J. A computational model of eye movements during object class detection. In: Weiss Y., Scholkopf B., and Platt J. (Eds). Advances in neural information processing systems 18 (2006), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1609-1616
268. Zhang W., Yu B., Zelinsky G.J., and Samaras D. Object class recognition using multiple layer boosting with heterogeneous features. In: Schmid C., Soatto S., and Tomasi C. (Eds). CVPR 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2 (2005), IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA 323-330