The role of reentrant processes in feature binding: Evidence from neuropsychology and TMS on late onset illusory conjunctions

Visual Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 25-47

  Braet, Wouter ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Illusory conjunction; Parietal cortex; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGNOSIA; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULTANAGNOSIA; STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 58649085507     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280802193318     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahissar, M. and Hochstein, S. (2004) The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 457-464.
2. Arguin, M., Cavanagh, P. and Joanette, Y. (1994) Visual feature integration with an attention deficit. Brain and Cognition, 24, pp. 44-56.
3. Ashbridge, E., Walsh, V. and Cowey, A. (1997) Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 35:8, pp. 1121-1131.
4. Ashburner, J. and Friston, K. J. (2005) Unified segmentation. Neuroimage, 26, pp. 839-851.
5. Braet, W. and Humphreys, G. W. (2006) The "special effect" of case mixing on word identification: Neuropsychological and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies dissociating case mixing from contrast reduction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, pp. 1666-1675.
6. Cinel, C. and Humphreys, G. W. (2006) On the relations between implicit and explicit spatial binding: Evidence from Balint's syndrome. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, pp. 127-140.
7. Cohen, A. and Ivry, R. (1989) Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15:4, pp. 650-663.
8. Cohen, A. and Rafal, R. D. (1991) Attention and feature integration: Illusory conjunctions in a patient with a parietal lobe lesion. Psychological Science, 2, pp. 106-110.
9. Cooper, A. C. G., Humphreys, G. W., Hulleman, J., Praamstra, P. and Georgeson, M. A. (2004) Trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to right parietal cortex modifies the attentional blink. Experimental Brain Research, 155, pp. 24-29.
10. Corbetta, M. and Shulman, G. L. (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, pp. 201-215.
11. Crinion, J., Ashburner, J., Leff, A., Brett, M., Price, C. and Friston, K. (2007) Spatial normalization of lesioned brains: Performance evaluation and impact on fMRI analyses. Neuroimage, 37, pp. 866-875.
12. Donk, M. (1999) Illusory conjunctions are an illusion: The effects of target-nontarget similarity on conjunction and feature errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, pp. 1207-1253.
13. Donner, T. H., Kettermann, A., Diesch, E., Ostendorf, F., Villringer, A. and Brandt, S. A. (2002) Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks. Neuroimage, 15:1, pp. 16-25.
14. Duvernoy, H. M. (1991) The human brain: Surface, three-dimensional sectional anatomy and MRI, Springer-Verlag, Wien, Austria
15. Esterman, M., Verstynen, T. and Robertson, L. C. (2007) Attenuating illusory binding with TMS of the right parietal cortex. Neuroimage, 35, pp. 1247-1255.
16. Fierro, B., Brighina, F., Giglia, G., Palermo, A., Francolini, M. and Scalia, S. (2006) Paired pulse TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial perception. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 247:2, pp. 144-148.
17. Friedman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C. and Treisman, A. (1995) Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science, 269, pp. 853-855.
18. Gilchrist, I., Humphreys, G. W. and Riddoch, M. J. (1996) Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, pp. 1223-1256.
19. Hovey, C., Houseman, P. and Jalinous, R. (2003) A guide to magnetic stimulation, The Magstim Company, Whitland, UK
20. Humphreys, G. W. (1998) Neural representations of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society, Series B, 353, pp. 1341-1351.
21. Humphreys, G. W. (2001) A multi-stage account of binding in vision: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition, 8, pp. 381-410.
22. Humphreys, G. W., Cinel, C., Wolfe, J., Olson, A. and Klempen, N. (2000) Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features. Vision Research, 40:10, pp. 1569-1596.
23. Juan, C. H. and Walsh, V. (2003) Feedback to V1: A reverse hierarchy in vision. Experimental Brain Research, 150:2, pp. 259-263.
24. Karnath, H. O. (1988) Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect. Neuropsychologia, 26, pp. 27-43.
25. Kinsbourne, M. and Warrington, E. K. (1962) A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain, 85, pp. 461-486.
26. Lalli, S., Hussain, Z., Ayub, A., Cracco, R. Q., Bodis-Wollner, I. and Amassian, V. E. (2006) Role of the calcarine cortex (V1) in perception of visual cues for saccades. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117:9, pp. 2030-2038.
27. Leff, A. P., Scott, S. K., Rothwell, J. C. and & Wise, R. J. S. (2001) The planning and guiding of saccades: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, pp. 918-923.
28. Lisanby, S. H., Gutman, D., Luber, B., Schroeder, C. and Sackeim, H. A. (2001) Sham TMS: Intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials. Biological Psychiatry, 49, pp. 460-463.
29. Mattingly, J. B., Davis, G. and Driver, J. (1997) Pre-attentive filling in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science, 275, pp. 671-674.
30. McCrea, S. M., Buxbaum, L. J. and Coslett, H. B. (2006) Illusory conjunctions in simultanagnosia: Coarse coding of visual feature location?. Neuropsychologia, 44, pp. 1724-1736.
31. Mechelli, A., Price, C. J., Friston, K. J. and Ashburner, J. (2005) Voxel-based morphometry of the human brain: Methods and applications. Current Medical Imaging Reviews, 1, pp. 105-113.
32. Mevorach, C., Humphreys, G. W. and Shalev, L. (2006) Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, pp. 740-742.
33. Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Walsh, V. and Frith, C. D. (2003) Brain activations during visual search: Contributions of search efficiency versus feature binding. Neuroimage, 18:1, pp. 91-103.
34. Penny, W., Holmes, A. and Friston, K. (2003) Random effects analysis. Human brain function, pp. 843-850. Academic Press, Oxford, UK
35. Prinzmetal, W. (1981) Principles of feature integration. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, pp. 330-340.
36. Rensink, R. A. (2000) The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, pp. 17-42.
37. Robertson, L. C., Treisman, A., Friedman-Hill, S. and Grabowecky, M. (1997) The interaction of spatial and object pathways: Evidence from Balint's syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, pp. 295-317.
38. Rorden, C.
39. Schneider, W. X. and Deubel, H. (2002) Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: A review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action, pp. 609-627. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
40. Shafritz, K. M., Gore, J. C. and Marois, R. (2002) The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 99:16, pp. 10917-10922.
41. Talairach, J. and Tournoux, P. (1988) Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain, Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart, Austria
42. Treisman, A. (1998) Feature binding, perception and object perception. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society, 353, pp. 1295-1306.
43. Treisman, A. M. and Gelade, G. (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12:1, pp. 97-136.
44. Treisman, A. M. and Kanwisher, N. G. (1998) Perceiving visually presented objects: Recognition, awareness, and modularity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, pp. 218-226.
45. Treisman, A. M. and Schmidt, H. (1982) Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, pp. 107-141.
46. Walsh, V., Ashbridge, E. and Cowey, A. (1998) Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 36:1, pp. 45-49.
47. Walsh, V., Ellison, A., Ashbridge, E. and Cowey, A. (1999) The role of the parietal cortex in visual attention-hemispheric asymmetries and the effects of learning: A magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 37, pp. 245-251.
48. Walsh, V., Ellison, A., Battelli, L. and Cowey, A. (1998) Task-specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, 265, pp. 537-543.
49. Ward, R., Goodrich, S. and Driver, J. (1994) Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection. Visual Cognition, 1, pp. 101-130.
50. Wasserman, E. M. (1998) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 107, pp. 1-16.
51. Wojciulik, E. and Kanwisher, N. (1998) Implicit but not explicit feature binding in a Balint's patient. Visual Cognition, 5, pp. 157-181.
52. Worsley, K. J. (2003) Developments in random field theory. Human brain function, pp. 881-886. Academic Press, Oxford, UK
53. Yang, Q. and Kapoula, Z. (2004) TMS over the left posterior parietal cortex prolongs latency of contralateral saccades and convergence. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 45, pp. 2231-2239.