A bias to detail: How hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 352-359

  Davoli, Christopher C ^a   Brockmole, James R ^a   Goujon, Annabelle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Posture; Visual learning; Visual memory; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BODY POSTURE; COLOR VISION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; HAND; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; RECALL; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FRACTALS; HAND; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; POSTURE; PROPRIOCEPTION;

EID: 84860606679     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0147-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. K., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035-1047.
2. Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370-374.
3. Brockmole, J. R., Hambrick, D. Z., Windisch, D. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The role of meaning in contextual cueing: Evidence from chess expertise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1886-1896.
4. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99-108.
5. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
6. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
7. Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2010). Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychological Science, 21, 1254-1258.
8. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
9. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 104, 268-294.
10. Davoli, C. C., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science, 20, 293-295.
11. Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Garverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don't touch: The effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 555-562.
12. Drews, F. A., Yazdani, H., Godfrey, C. N., Cooper, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2009). Text messaging during simulated driving. Human Factors, 51, 762-770.
13. Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cueing. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1366-1378.
14. Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, 71, 22-29.
15. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25. doi: 10. 1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8.
16. Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2007). Contextual cueing based on specific and categorical properties of the environment. Visual Cognition, 15, 257-275. doi: 10. 1080/13506280600677744.
17. Graziano, M. S. A., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44, 845-859.
18. Jiang, Y., & Song, J. (2005). Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: Learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1439-1448.
19. Lotan, M., Gold, C., & Yalon-Chamovitz, S. (2009). Reducing challenging behavior through structured therapeutic intervention in the controlled multi-sensory environment (Snoezelen): Ten case studies. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 8, 377-392.
20. Minogue, J., & Jones, M. G. (2006). Haptics in education: Exploring an untapped sensory modality. Review of Educational Research, 76, 317-348.
21. Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (2000). Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 176-210.
22. Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166-177.
23. Tseng, P., & Bridgeman, B. (2011). Improved change detection with nearby hands. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 257-269.
24. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. Vishton, P. M., Stephens, N. J., Nelson, L. A., Morra, S. E., Brunick, K. L., & Stevens, J. A. (2007). Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it. Psychological Science, 18, 713-719.