Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1803-1813

  Brockmole, James R ^a   Võ, Melissa Le Hoa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EYE MOVEMENTS; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 77958493110     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1803     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baldwin, D., Andersson, A., Saffran, J., & Meyer, M. (2008). Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure. Cognition, 106, 1382-1407.
2. Brady, T. F., & Oliva, A. (2008). Statistical learning using real-world scenes: Extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychological Science, 19, 678-685.
3. Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 699-706.
4. Brockmole, J. R., Hambrick, D. Z., Windisch, D. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The role of meaning in contextual cuing: Evidence from chess expertise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1886-1896.
5. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006a). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cuing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1177-1187.
6. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006b). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99-108.
7. Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 753-763.
9. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
10. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
11. Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2008). Associative learning mechanisms in vision. In S. J. Luck & A. R. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 209-245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Crist, R. E., Kapadia, M. K., Westheimer, G., & Gilbert, C. D. (1997). Perceptual learning of spatial localization: Specificity for orientation, position, and context. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2889-2894.
13. Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 393-401.
14. Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559-564.
15. De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317-329.
16. Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973-980.
17. Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1366-1378.
18. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499-504.
19. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 458-467.
20. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2005). Encoding multielement scenes: Statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 521-537.
21. Friedman, A., & Liebelt, L. S. (1981). On the time course of viewing pictures with a view towards remembering. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 137-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
22. Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13, 520-525.
23. Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2005). Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1252-1268.
24. Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2007). Contextual cuing based on specific and categorical properties of the environment. Visual Cognition, 15, 257-275.
25. Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2009). Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 50-71.
26. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537-562). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 210-228.
28. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352-376.
29. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105-1124.
30. Jiang, Y., & Song, J.-H. (2005). Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: Learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31,1439-1448.
31. Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35-B42.
32. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 816-828.
33. Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 333-352.
34. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research, 46, 614-621.
35. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1299-1313.
36. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273-302.
37. Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249.
38. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
39. Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
40. Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition, 36, 403-415.
41. Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207-222.
42. Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19, 73-74.
43. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
44. Turk-Browne, N. B., Isola, P. J., Scholl, B. J., & Treat, T. A. (2008). Multidimensional visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 399-407.
45. Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552-564.
46. Turk-Browne, N. B., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Flexible visual statistical learning: Transfer across space and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 195-202.
47. Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1934-1945.
48. Võ, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3, Art. 24), 1-15.
49. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum