Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 814-842

  Rauschenberger, Robert ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842686908     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196545     Document Type: Review

References (157)

1. ATCHLEY, P., KRAMER, A. F., & HILLSTROM, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for object transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 594-606.
2. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1991). Local processes in preattentive feature detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 77-90.
3. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
4. BICHOT, N. P., CAVE, K. R., & PASHLER, H. (1999). Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 403-423.
5. BRAUN, J. (1998). Vision and attention: The role of training. Nature, 393, 424-425.
6. BRAUN, J., & SAGI, D. (1990). Vision outside the focus of attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 45-58.
7. BRAUN, J., & SAGI, D. (1991). Texture-based tasks are little affected by second tasks requiring peripheral or central attentive fixation. Perception, 20, 483-500.
8. BRAVO, M. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465-472.
9. BREITMEYER, B., & JULESZ, B. (1975). The role of on and off transients in determining the psychophysical spatial frequency response. Vision Research, 15, 411-415.
10. CARLSON, R. L, & SHOMSTEIN, S. (2001). Disambiguating strategic effects in visual search [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 1, 119.
11. CAVE, K. R., & WOLFE, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
12. CAVE, K. R., & ZIMMERMAN, J. M. (1997). Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice. Psychological Science, 8, 399-403.
13. CEPEDA, N. J., CAVE, K. R., BICHOT, N. P., & KIM, M.-S: (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 727-746.
14. CHASTAIN, G., & CHEAL, M. (1998). Automatic versus directed attention with single-element and multiple-element precues. Visual Cognition, 5, 339-364.
15. CHASTAIN, G., & CHEAL, M. (1999a). Time course of attention effects with abrupt-onset and offset single- and multiple-element precues. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 411-436.
16. CHASTAIN, G., & CHEAL, M. (1999b, November). Validity effects with offset and onset distractors and targets. Poster presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
17. CHEAL, M., & CHASTAIN, G. (1998). Attention effects of moving and stationary single-element and multiple-element precues: Limits of automaticity. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 873-887.
18. COLE, G., GELLATLY, A., & BLURTON, A. (2001). Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1356-1368.
19. DI LOLLO, V. KAWAHARA, J., ZUVIC, S. M., & VISSER, T. A. (2001). The preattentive emperor has no clothes: A dynamic redressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 479-492.
20. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
21. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
22. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
23. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 578-588.
24. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
25. ENNS, J. T., AUSTEN, E. L., DI LOLLO, V., RAUSCHENBERGER, R., & YANTIS, S. (2001). New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1287-1302.
26. ERIKSEN, C. W., & HOFFMAN, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.
27. FOLK, C. L., & ANNETT, S. (1994). Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 277-287.
28. FOLK, C. L., & EGETH, H. E. (1989). Does the identification of simple features require serial processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 97-110.
29. FOLK, C. L., LEBER, A. B., & EGETH, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741-753.
30. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. [W.] (1996). When knowledge does not help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of selective attention (pp. 271-295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. [W] (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 847-858.
32. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. [W.] (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
33. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
34. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 682-685.
35. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & WRIGHT, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 317-329.
36. FRANCONERI, S. L., & SIMONS, D. J. (2001, May). Abrupt onsets are not unique in capturing attention. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
37. FRANCONERI, S. L., & SIMONS, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 999-1010.
38. GELLATLY, A., & COLE, G. (2000). Accuracy of target detection in new-object and old-object displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 889-899.
39. GELLATLY, A., COLE, G., & BLURTON, A. (1999). Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1609-1624.
40. GHIRARDELLI, T. G., & EGETH, H. E. (1998). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in cross-dimensional texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 826-838.
41. GIBSON, B. S. (1996a). The masking account of attentional capture: A reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1514-1520.
42. GIBSON, B. S. (1996b). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1496-1504.
43. GIBSON, B. S. (1999, November). A closer look at contingent capture. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
44. GIBSON, B. S., & AMELIO, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 496-504.
45. GIBSON, B. S., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search. Psychological Science, 9, 176-182.
46. GIBSON, B. S., & KELSEY, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699-706.
47. GRANDISON, T., VAUGHAN, B., & YANTIS, S. (1997, May). Context affects attentional capture by object onsets. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
48. HALPERN, D. F. (1987). The functional equivalence of objective and illusory brightness enhancement. In S. J. Petri & G. E. Meyer (Eds.), The perception of illusory contours (pp. 171-175). New York: Springer-Verlag.
49. HASSENSTEIN, B., & HUSTERT, R. (1999). Hiding responses of locusts to approaching objects. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 1701-1710.
50. HE, Z. J., & OOI, T. L. (1999). Perceptual organization of apparent motion in the Ternus display. Perception, 28, 877-892.
51. HILLSTROM, A. P., & YANTIS, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411.
52. HORSTMANN, G. (2002). Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search. Psychological Science, 6, 499-505.
53. IRWIN, D. E., COLCOMBE, A. M., KRAMER, A. F., & HAHN, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons. Vision Research, 40, 1443-1458.
54. JOHNSON, J. D., HUTCHINSON, K. A., & NEILL, W. T. (2001). Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 841-847.
55. JONIDES, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. JONIDES, J., & MACK, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 29-44.
57. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
58. JOSEPH, J. S., CHUN, M. M., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a "preattentive" feature search task. Nature, 387, 805-807.
59. JOSEPH, J. S., & OPTICAN, L. M. (1996). Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 651-665.
60. JUOLA, J. F., KOSHINO, H., & WARNER, C. B. (1995). Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 333-342.
61. KAHNEMAN, D., & HENIK, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 181-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. KAHNEMAN, D., & TREISMAN, A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R, Parasuraman & D. A. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). San Diego: Academic Press.
63. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A. M., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
64. KIM, M. S., & CAVE, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 6, 376-380.
65. KING, S. M., DYKEMAN, C., REDGRAVE, P., & DEAN, P. (1992). Use of a distracting task to obtain defensive head movements to looming visual stimuli by human adults in a laboratory setting. Perception, 21, 245-259.
66. KOCH, C., & ULLMAN, S. (1985). Shifts in selective attention: Toward the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
67. KOSHINO, H., WARNER, C. B., & JUOLA, J. F. (1992). Relative effectiveness of central, peripheral, and abrupt-onset cues in visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 609-631.
68. KRAMER, P., & RUDD, M. (1999). Visible persistence and form correspondence in Ternus apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 952-962.
69. KRAMER, P., & YANTIS, S. (1997). Perceptual grouping in space and time: Evidence from the Ternus display. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 87-99.
70. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1982). Abrupt changes in visual stimulation enhance processing of form and location information. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 511-523.
71. LAMBERT, A., & HOCKEY, R. (1991). Peripheral visual changes and spatial attention. Acta Psychologica, 76, 149-163.
72. LAMBERT, A., SPENCER, E., & MOHINDRA, N. (1987). Automaticity and the capture of attention by a peripheral display change. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, 6, 136-147.
73. LAMY, D., & EGETH, H. (2002), Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52-66.
74. LAMY, D., & TSAL, Y. (1999). A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 93-98.
75. LENNIE, P. (1980). Parallel visual pathways: A review. Vision Research, 20, 562-594.
76. MARTIN-EMERSON, R., & KRAMER, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 739-751.
77. MAYLOR, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Martin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. MILLER, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567-571.
79. MOUNTS, J. R. W. (2000). Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 969-983.
80. MOUNTS, J. R. W., & MELARA, R. D. (1999). Attentional selection of objects or features: Evidence from a modified search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 322-341.
81. MÜLLER, H. J., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315-330.
82. NAKAYAMA, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411-422). New York: Cambridge University Press.
83. NAKAYAMA, K. (1999, November). Object perception and memory in visual search. Paper presented at the annual Workshop on Object Perception and Memory (OPAM), Los Angeles.
84. NAKAYAMA, K., & JOSEPH, J. S. (1998). Attention, pattern recognition, and pop-out in visual search. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 279-298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. NAKAYAMA, K., & MACKEBEN, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631-1647.
86. NANEZ, J. E. (1988). Perception of impending collision in 3- to 6-week-old infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 11, 447-463.
87. NANEZ, J. E., & YONAS, A. (1995). Effects of luminance and texture motion on infant defensive reactions to optical collision. Infant Behavior & Development, 17, 165-174.
88. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited-capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 22-42.
89. OONK, H. M., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1998). New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 510-515.
90. PANTLE, A. J., & PICCIANO, L. (1976). A multistage movement display: Evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision. Science, 193, 500-502.
91. PASHLER, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 307-318.
92. PHILLIPS, W. A., & SINGER, W. (1974). Function and interaction of on and off transients in vision: 1. Psychophysics. Experimental Brain Research, 19, 493-506.
93. PIKLER, J. (1917). Sinnesphysiologische Untersuchungen. Leipzig: Barth.
94. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
95. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. POSNER, M. J., COHEN, Y., & RAFAL, R. D. (1982). Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 298, 87-198.
97. PRATT, J., SEKULER, A. B., & MCAULIFFE, J. (2001). The role of attentional set on attentional cuing and inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 8, 22-46.
98. PROULX, M. J. (2002). No contingencies: Attentional prioritization by big or bright singletons. Unpublished master's thesis, Johns Hopkins University.
99. RAUSCHENBERGER, R. (2003). When something old becomes something new: Spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 600-615.
100. RAUSCHENBERGER, R., & YANTIS, S. (2001). Attentional capture by globally defined objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1250-1261.
101. REMINGTON, R. W., JOHNSTON, J. C., & YANTIS, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279-290.
102. SCHIFF, W., CAVINESS, J. A., & GIBSON, J. J. (1962). Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of "looming." Science, 136, 982-983.
103. SCHOLL, B. J., PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & FELDMAN, J. (2001). What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple-object tracking. Cognition, 80, 159-177.
104. SIMONS, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 147-155.
105. SINGER, W., & PHILLIPS, W. A. (1974). Function and interaction of on and off transients in vision: 2, Neurophysiology. Experimental Brain Research, 19, 507-521.
106. STEVENS, S. S., & GALANTER, E. H. (1957). Ratio scales and category scales on a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 377-411.
107. TERNUS, J. (1926). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über phänomenale Identität. Psychologische Forschung, 7, 81-136.
108. THEEUWES, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: Evidence from selective search. Acta Psychologica, 74, 81-99.
109. THEEUWES, J. (1991a). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
110. THEEUWES, J. (1991b). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
111. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
112. THEEUWES, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 799-806.
113. THEEUWES, J. (1995a). Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 637-644.
114. THEEUWES, J. (1995b). Temporal and spatial characteristics of preattentive and attentive processing. Visual Cognition, 2, 221-233.
115. THEEUWES, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 297-314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
116. THEEUWES, J., ATCHLEY, P., & KRAMER, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 105-124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
117. THEEUWES, J., & BURGER, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1342-1353.
118. THEEUWES, J., & GODIJN, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 764-770.
119. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130-134.
120. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (1999). Attentional effects of preattentive vision: Spatial precues affect the detection of simple features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 341-347.
121. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (2001). Spatial attention in early vision. Acta Psychologica, 108, 1-20.
122. THOMAS, S. J., & LUCK, S. J. (2000). Multiple pathways to the automatic capture of attention. Unpublished manuscript.
123. TODD, J. T., & VAN GELDER, P. (1979). Implications of a transientsustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 625-638.
124. TODD, S., & KRAMER, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 198-210.
125. TREISMAN, A. M. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 194-214.
126. TREISMAN, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
127. TREISMAN, A. M. (1992). Spreading suppression or feature integration? A reply to Duncan and Humphreys (1992). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 589-593.
128. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
129. TREISMAN, A. [M.], KAHNEMAN, D., & BURKELL, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
130. TREISMAN, A. M., & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
131. TURATTO, M., & GALFANO, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639-1643.
132. TURATTO, M., & GALFANO, G. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 286-297.
133. ULLMAN, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18, 97-159.
134. WANG, D. L., KRISTJANSSON, A., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2001). Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance: A putative role for perceptual organization (Cognitive Science Tech. Rep. No. 26). Columbus: Ohio State University, Center for Cognitive Sciences.
135. WARNER, C. B., JUOLA, J. F., & KOSHINO, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 243-251.
136. WATSON, D. G. (2001). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 74-84.
137. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1995). Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: No special role for onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 583-597.
138. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
139. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.
140. WERTHEIMER, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161-265.
141. WOLFE, J. M. (1992). "Effortless" texture segmentation and "parallel" visual search are not the same thing. Vision Research, 32, 757-763.
142. WOLFE, J. M., & BENNETT, S. C. (1996). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.
143. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.
144. WOLFE, J. M., O'NEILL, P., & BENNETT, S. C. (1998). Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 140-156.
145. YANTIS, S. (1993a). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.
146. YANTIS, S. (1993b). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
147. YANTIS, S. (1995). Perceived continuity of occluded visual objects. Psychological Science, 6, 182-186.
148. YANTIS, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). Hove, U.K.: Taylor & Francis.
149. YANTIS, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 71-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
150. YANTIS, S., & EGETH, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 661-676.
151. YANTIS, S., & GIBSON, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182-204.
152. YANTIS, S., & HILLSTROM, A. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 95-107.
153. YANTIS, S., & JOHNSON, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 812-825.
154. YANTIS, S., & JONES, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 166-178.
155. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.
156. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.
157. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1505-1513.