Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback

Instructional Science

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 257-275

  Lu, Jingyan ^a   Law, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Affective feedback; Cognitive feedback; Online assessment; Peer assessment; Peer feedback; Peer grading

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857059914     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-19.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
3. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191-205.
4. Bostock, S. (2000). Student peer assessment Retrieved May 5, 2010, from http://www. palatine. ac. uk/files/994. pdf.
5. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-90.
6. Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5-32.
7. Burnett, P. C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students' perceptions of the classroom environment. Educational Psychology, 22, 5-16.
8. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
9. Chen, Y.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105-117.
10. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 301-304.
11. Cho, Y., & Cho, K. (2010). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science. doi: 10. 1007/s11251-010-9146-1.
12. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260-294.
13. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438.
14. Duijnhouwer, H. (2010). Feedback effects on students' writing motivation, process, and performance. Universiteit Utrecht. Retrieved from http://igitur-archive. library. uu. nl/dissertations/2010-0520-200214/UUindex. html.
15. Education and Manpower Bureau. (2007). Background. Liberal Studies: Currlculum and Assessment Guide (Secondary 4-6). Hong Kong.
16. Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers written feedback on students homework: Changing teachers behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 162-173.
17. Ellman, N. (1975). Peer evaluation and peer grading. The English Journal, 64(3), 79-80.
18. Elwell, W. C., & Tiberio, J. (1994). Teacher praise: What students want. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 21(4), 322.
19. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146-166.
20. Falchikov, N., & Blythman, M. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
21. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287.
22. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.
23. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2009). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
24. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
25. Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774-795.
26. Hughes, I. E. (1995). Peer assessment. Capability, 1, 39-43.
27. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144.
28. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
29. Kwok, R. C. W., & Ma, J. (1999). Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers & Education, 32(2), 109-125.
30. Law, N. W. Y., Lee, Y., van Aalst, J., Chan, C. K. K., Kwan, A., Lu, J., et al. (2009). Using Web 2. 0 technology to support learning, teaching and assessment in the NSS Liberal Studies subject. Hong Kong Teachers' Centre Journal, 8, 43-51.
31. Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536.
32. Lin, S., Liu, E., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
33. Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.
34. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246-251.
35. Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how. Retrieved from http://pareonline. net/getvn. asp?v=7&n=3.
36. Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375-401.
37. Nilson, L. B. (2003). Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34-38.
38. Olson, V. L. B. (1990). The revising processes of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 22.
39. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-250.
40. Page, E. B. (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49(4), 173-181.
41. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis method (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. Reuse-Durham, N. (2005). Peer evaluation as an active learning technique. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(4), 328-345.
43. Rowntree, D. (1987). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page.
44. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
45. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
46. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75.
47. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.
48. Straub, R. (1997). Students' reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 91-119.
49. Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291-303.
50. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-277.
51. Topping, K. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55-87). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
52. Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113-132.
53. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
54. Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Internet-based peer assessment in high school settings. In L. T. W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 743-754). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
55. Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293-310.
56. Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S.-M. (2001). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252.
57. Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
58. van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280-290.
59. van Lehn, K. A., Chi, M. T. H., Baggett, W., & Murray, R. C. (1995). Progress report: Towards a theory of learning during tutoring. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Centre, University of Pittsburgh.
60. van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriėnboer, J. (2009). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.
61. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44.
62. White, K. J., & Jones, K. (2000). Effects of teacher feedback on the reputations and peer perceptions of children with behavior problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76(4), 302-326.
63. Wilkinson, S. S. (1981). The relationship of teacher praise and student achievement: A meta-analysis of selected research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(9-A), 3998.
64. Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 186-193.
65. Yang, Y.-F. (2010). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8535. 2010. 01059. x.
66. Yang, Y.-F., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72-83.