Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 301-314

  Cheng, Winnie ^a   Warren, Martin ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000314899     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293990240304     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BIRDSONG, T. & SHARPLIN, W. (1986) Peer evaluation enhances students' critical judgement, Highway One, 9(1), pp. 23-28.
2. BOUD, D. J. (1990) Assessment and promotion of academic values, Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), pp. 101-113.
3. CHENG, W. & WARREN, M. (1997) Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise, Studies in Higher Education 22(2), pp. 233-239.
4. CONWAY, R., KEMBER, D., SIVAN, A. & Wu, M. (1993) Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 45-56.
5. FALCHIKOV, N. & MAGIN, D. (1997) Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students' group process work, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), pp. 385-396.
6. FINEMAN, S. (1980) Reflections on peer teaching and peer assessment - An undergraduate experience, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 6(1), pp. 82-93.
7. FORDE, K. (1996) The effects of gender and proficiency on oral self- and peer-assessments, English Language Studies Working Papers, City University of Hong Kong, 1(1), pp. 34-47.
8. FREEMAN, M. (1995) Peer assessment by groups of group work, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), pp. 289-300.
9. GARRAT, L. (1995) Peer feedback in writing: is it 'culturally appropriate' for Hong Kong Chinese adult learners? Occasional Papers in English Language Teaching. (ELTU, The Chinese University of Hong Kong), 5, pp. 97-118.
10. GREEN, C, CHRISTOPHER, E. & LAM, J. (1997) Towards learner autonomy in postgraduate language studies: self and peer-evaluation in the development of academic discussion skills. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 263-273, in: D. Kember, et al. (Eds.). Case Studies of Improving Teaching and Learning from the Action Learning Project (Hong Kong, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Action Learning Project).
11. HUGHES, I. & LARGE, B. (1993) Staff and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills, Studies in Higher education, 18(3), pp. 379-385.
12. JACOBS, G. (1987) First experiences with peer feedback on compositions: Student and teacher reaction, System 15(3), pp. 325-333.
13. KWAN, K. P. & LEUNG, R. (1996) Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a simulation exercise, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 205-214.
14. MILLER, L. & NG, R. (1994) Peer assessment of oral language proficiency. Working Papers of the Department of English (Hong Kong, City University of Hong Kong), 6(2), pp. 41-56.
15. NEWKIRK, T. (1984) Direction and misdirection in peer response, College Composition and Communication, 35(3), pp. 301-311.
16. OLDFIELD, K. & MACALPINE, M. (1995) Peer and self-assessment at tertiary level - an experiential report, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(1), pp. 125-132.
17. PERCIVAL, F. & ELLINGTON, H. (1984) A Handbook of Educational Technology (London, Kogan Page).
18. SiVAN, A. (1996) Implementing peer assessment to improve teaching and learning. Paper presented in action learning project conference, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
19. SOMERVELL, H. (1993) Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self- peer and collaborative assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(3), pp. 221-233.
20. STEFANI, L. A. J. (1992) Comparison of collaborative self, peer and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practice, Biochemical Education, 20, pp. 148-151.