An evaluation of student response systems from the viewpoint of instructors and students

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 67-83

  Gok, Tolga ^a  

^a DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054002596     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abrahamson, L. (2006). A brief history of networked classrooms: Effects, cases, pedagogy, and implications. In D., Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 1-25). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
2. Akerlind, G. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321-334.
3. Al-Fahad, F. H. (2009). Students' attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in king saud university, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 8(2), 111-119.
4. Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrolment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biology Education, 4, 262-268.
5. Anderson, W., & Krathwohl, R. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman
6. Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. EDUCAUSE Research Bulletin, 3, 1-13.
7. Beatty, D., Leonard, J., Gerace, J., & Dufresne, J. (2006), Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74, 31-39.
8. Bergtrom, G. (2006). Clicker sets as learning objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2
9. Boyle, J. (2006). Eight years of asking questions. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 289-304). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
10. Brewer, C. A. (2004). Near real-time assessment of student learning and understanding in biology courses. BioScience, 54(11), 1034-1039.
11. Bullock, D. W., LaBella, V. P., Clinghan, T., Ding, Z., Stewart, G., & Thibado, P. M. (2002). Enhancing the student-instructor interaction frequency. The Physics Teacher, 40, 30-36.
12. Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher, 39(1), 8-11.
13. Burton, K. (2006). The trial of an audience response system to facilitate problem-based learning in legal education. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 265-276). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
14. Caldwell, E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6, 9-20.
15. Carnaghan, C., & Webb, A. (2007). Investigating the effects of group response systems on student satisfaction, learning, and engagement in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 391-409.
16. Cline, K. S. (2006). Classroom voting in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 100(2), 100-104.
17. Cohen J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. NJ:Earlbaum Hillsade
18. Creswell, W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
19. Crouch, H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977.
20. Cutts, Q. (2006). Practical lessons from four years of using an ARS in every lecture of a large class. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 65-79). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
21. D'Inverno, R., Davis, H., & White, S. (2003). Using a personal response system for promoting student interaction. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 22(4), 163-169.
22. Draper, S. W., Cargill, J., & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18, 13-23.
23. Draper, W., & Brown, I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94.
24. Dufresne, J., & Gerace, J. (2004). Assessing-to-learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42, 428-433.
25. Durbin, S. M., & Durbin, K. A. (2006). Anonymous polling in a engineering tutorial environment: A case study. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 116-126). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
26. Elliott, C. (2003) Using a personal response system in economics teaching. International Review of Economics Education, 1(1)
27. El-Rady, J. (2006). To click or not to click: That's the question. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 2(4)
28. Fagan, A. P., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The Physics Teacher, 40(4), 206-209.
29. Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.
30. Freeman, M., Bell, A., Comerton-Forder, C., Pickering, J., & Blayney, P. (2007). Factors affecting educational innovation with in class electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 149-170.
31. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books
32. Greer, L., & Heaney, P. J. (2004). Real-time analysis of student comprehension: An assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory earth science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 52(4), 345-351.
33. Glaser, G., & Strauss, L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine
34. Hatch, J., Jensen, M., & Moore, R. (2005). Manna from heaven or clickers from hell: Experience with an electronic response system. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34, 36-39.
35. Hinde, K., & Hunt, A. (2006). Using the personal response system to enhance student learning: Some evidence from teaching economics. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 140-154). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
36. Horowitz, H. M. (2006). ARS evolution: Reflections and recommendations. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 53-63). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
37. Hu, J., Bertol, P., Hamilton, M., White, G., Duff, A., & Cutts, Q. (2006). Wireless interactive teaching by using keypad-based ARS. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 209-221). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
38. Hussain, I., & Adeeb, M. A. (2009). Role of mobile technology in promoting campus-wide learning environment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 8(3), 48-57.
39. Jackson, M., Ganger, A., Bridge, P. D., & Ginsburg, K. (2005). Wireless handheld computers in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Medical Education Online, 10(5)
40. Jones, C., Connolly, M., Gear, A., & Read, M. (2001). Group integrative learning with group process support technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 571-581.
41. Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
42. Kaleta, R., & Joosten, T. (2007). Student response systems: A University of Wisconsin system study of clickers. EDUCAUSE Research Bulletin, 10, 1-12.
43. Kay, R. (2009). Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS). Computers and Education, 52, 730-740.
44. Kay, R., & LeSage, A. (2009a). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience-response system: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 53, 819-827.
45. Kay, R., & LeSage, A. (2009b). A strategic assessment of audience response systems used in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 235-249.
46. Kennedy, G. E., & Cutts, Q. I. (2005). The association between students' use of electronic voting systems and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 260-268.
47. Kennedy, G. E., Cutts, Q., & Draper, S. W. (2006). Evaluating electronic voting systems in lectures: Two innovative methods. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 155-174). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
48. Keskin, N. O., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspectives, theories and practices of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 10(2), 202-208.
49. Latessa, R., & Mouw, D. (2005). Use of audience response system to augment interactive learning. Family Medicine, 37(I), 12-14.
50. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
51. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(2), 28-49.
52. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: User's Manual. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
53. McCabe, M. (2006). Live assessment by questioning in an interactive classroom. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 276-288). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
54. Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473.
55. Paschal, C. B. (2002). Formative assessment in physiology teaching using a wireless classroom communication system. Advances in Physiology Education, 26(4), 299-308.
56. Pelton, L. F., & Pelton, T. (2006). Selected and constructed response systems in mathematics. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 175-186). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing
57. Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E., & Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. American Journal of Physics, 66(5), 439-441.
58. Pradhan, A., Sparano, D., & Ananth, C. V. (2005). The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: An application to resident education. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(5), 1827-1830.
59. Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 29-41.
60. Reay, N. W., Bao, L., Li, P., Warnakulasooriya, R., & Baugh, G. (2005). Toward the effective use of voting machines in physics lectures. American Journal of Physics, 73(6), 554-558.
61. Reay, N. W., Li, P., & Bao, L. (2008). Testing a new voting machine question methodology. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 171-178.
62. Robertson, L. J. (2000). Twelve tips for using a computerized interactive audience response system. Medical Teacher, 22(3), 237-239.
63. Schackow, T. E., Milton, C., Loya, L., & Friedman, M. (2004). Audience response system: Effect on learning in family medicine residents. Family Medicine, 36, 496-504.
64. Sharma, M. D., Khachan, J., Chan, B., & O'Byrne, J. (2005). An investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lectures. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 137-154.
65. Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. (2006). Use of classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398-403.
66. Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2007). Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: A comparison of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 187-208.
67. Slain, D., Abate, M., Hidges, B. M., Stamatakis, M. K., & Wolak, S. (2004). An interactive response system to promote active learning in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(5), 1-9.
68. Steinhert, Y., & Snell, L. S. (1999). Interactive lecturing: Strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 37-42.
69. Stuart, S. A. J., Brown, M. I., & Draper, S. W. (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: One practitioner's application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 95-102.
70. Trees, A. R., & Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 21-40.
71. Uhari, M., Renko, M., & Soini, H. (2003). Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Medical Education, 3(12), 1-6.
72. Van Dijk, L. A., Van Den Berg, G. C., & Van Keulen, H. (2001). Interactive lectures in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 15-28.