A brief history of networked classrooms: Effects, cases, pedagogy, and implications

Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-25

  Abrahamson, Louis ^a  

^a Better Education Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898263267     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-947-2.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. st Century tool for teachers - An ancient concept in teaching (videotape). Yorktown, VA, Better Education Inc.
2. Abrahamson, A. L. (1998, June 3-6). An overview of teaching and learning research with classroom communication systems (CCSs). Paper presented at Samos International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics, Village of Pythagorion, Samos, Greece. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Abrahamson, A. L. (1999). Teaching with a classroom communication system - What it involves and why it works. Minicourse presented at VII Taller Internacional, Nuevas Tendencias en la Ensenanza de la Fisica, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Peubla, Puebla, Mexico.
4. Abrahamson, A. L. (2000). A brief history of Classtalk. Presented at Teachers Teaching with Teachnology (T-Cubed). International Conference, Dallas, Texas.
5. th Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, Atlanta, Georgia.
6. Abrahamson, A. L., Hartline, F. F., Fabert, M. G., Robson, M. J., & Knapp, R. J. (1989). An electronic classroom enabling self-paced interactive learning. Washington, DC, United States Patent Number 5,002,491.
7. Abrahamson, A. L., Hartline, F. F., Fabert, M. G., Robson, M. J., Knapp, & R. J. (1990). An electronic classroom enabling selfpaced interactive learning. Brussles, Belgium, European Patent Number 90 304 587.0.
8. Bapst, J. J. (1971). The effect of systematic student response upon teaching behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED060651).
9. Beatty, I. D. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems (ERB0403). Educause Center for Applied Research (ECAR) Research Bulletin, Issue 3, Boulder, Colorado,.
10. Bessler, W. C.(1969). The effectiveness of an electronic student response system in teaching biology to the non-major utilizing nine grouppaced, linear programs. Muncie, IN, Ball State University.
11. Bessler, W. C., & Nisbet, J. J. (1971). The use of an electronic response system in teaching biology. Science Education, 3, 275-284.
12. Brown, J. D. (1972). An evaluation of the Spitz student response system in teaching a course in logical and mathematical concepts. Journal of Experimental Education, 40(3), 12-20.
13. Casanova, J. (1971). An instructional experiment in organic chemistry, the use of a student response system. Journal of Chemical Education, 48(7), 453-455.
14. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Greathouse, S., & Nye, B. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about howmework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1).
15. Dufresne, B., & Gerace, B. (1994). Using "extended scenario" to enhance learning during interactive lectures. Retrieved March 25, 2003, from UMass Physics Education Research Group Web site.
16. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7(2), 3-47.
17. Dufresne, B., Gerace, B., Leonard, B., Mestre, J., & Wenk, L. (1996). Using the Classtalk classroom communication system for promoting active learning in large lectures. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, Edited volume - Student-active science: Models of innovation in college science teaching.
18. Dufresne, B., Gerace, B., Leonard, B., Mestre, J., & Wenk, L. (2003). Using a classroom communication system for promoting active learning in large lectures. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, (March).
19. Garg, D.P. (1975). Experiments with a computerized response system: A favorable experience. Paper presented at the Conference on Computers in the Undergraduate Curricula, Fort Worth, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED111355).
20. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods. American Journal of Physics 66, 64-74.
21. Hegedus, S., & Kaput, J. (2003, July). The effect of a Simcalc Connected Classrooms on students' algebraic thinking. Paper presented at the the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics EducationPsychology in Mathematics Education, Honolulu, Hawaii: College of Education, University of Hawaii.
22. Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
23. Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980a). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
24. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980b). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317-349.
25. Linn, M. C. (2004). (Personal Communication).
26. Littauer, R. (1972). Instructional implications of a low-cost electronic student response system. Educational Technology: Teacher and Technology Supplement, 12(10), 69-71.
27. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Meltzer, D. E., & Manivannan, K. (1996). The Physics Teacher, 34, 72.
29. Mestre, J. P., Gerace, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., & Leonard, W. J. (2003). Promoting active learning in large classes using a classroom communication system. Retrieved March 12, 2003, from http://www.psrc-online.org/classrooms/papers/mestre.html
30. Moore, G. A. (2002). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers (revised ed.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
31. National Research Council (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.
32. Norman, G. & Schmidt, H. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 6, 557-565.
33. Owens, D. T., Demana, F. A., Louis, A., Meagher, M., & Herman, M. (2004). Developing edagogy for wireless handheld computer networks and researching teacher professional development (ED479499). Washington, DC: ERIC, 137.
34. Penuel, W. R., Abrahamson, A. L., &Roschelle, J. (2005). Theorizing the transformed classroom: A sociocultural interpretation of the effects of audience response systems in higher education. Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases. D. A. Banks. This Volume.
35. Polman, J., & Pea, R. D. (1997). Transformative communication in project science learning discourse (ERIC ED407283). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
36. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). Classroom response and communication systems: Research review and theory. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association 2004 Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
37. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004b). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-54.
38. Rowe, M. B. (1974a). Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control: Part I, Fate control. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 81-94.
39. Rowe, M. B. (1974b). Relation of wait-time and rewards to the development of language, logic, and fate control: Part II, Rewards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 291-308.
40. Thomas, J. W. (1998). An overview of project-based learning. Novato, CA, Buck Institute for Education.
41. Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo
42. Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. M. (2002). Participatory simulations: Envisioning the networked classroom as a way to support systems learning for all. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.