Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 81-94

  Draper, S W ^a   Brown, M I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Campus; Formative; Interactivity; Lecture; Organizational change; Portable; Summative

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042776334     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Appleby E.C. (1968) Teaching aids and the practitioner. Veterinary Record 83, 291-292.
2. Boyle J.T. & Nicol D.J. (2003) Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Association of Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J) 11, 43-57.
3. Bridgman C.F. (1965) Innovations in the teaching of anatomy. American Journal of Veterinary Research 26, 1552-1561.
4. Charman D.J. & Fullerton H. (1995) Interactive lectures a case study in a geographical concepts course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 19, 41-55.
5. Crouch C.H. & Mazur E. (2001) Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69, 970-977.
6. Cuban L. (2001) Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, London.
7. Draper S.W. (1998) Niche-based success in CAL. Computers and Education 30, 5-8.
8. Draper S.W. (2001) 'Want to try interactive handsets in your lectures?' The Newsletter, no.231 (The University of Glasgow) and as [WWW document] URL http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/ilig/ad.html (visited 2003 May 1).
9. Draper (2003) 'Interactive Lectures Interest Group' [WWW document] URL http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/ilig/ (visited 2004 Jan 21).
10. Draper S.W., Brown M.I., Henderson F.P. & McAteer E. (1996) Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL. Computers and Education 26, 17-32.
11. Draper S.W., Cargill J. & Cutts Q. (2002) Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 18, 13-23.
12. Dufresne R.J., Gerace W.J., Leonard W.J., Mestre J.P. & Wenk L. (1996) Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning, Journal of Computing in Higher Education 7, 3-47.
13. Elliott C. (2001) 'Case Study: Economics Lectures Using a Personal Response System' [WWW document] URL http://www.economics.ltsn.ac.uk/showcase/ elliott_prs.htm (visited 2003 May 1).
14. Hake R.R. (1998) Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal Physics 66, 64-74.
15. Howe C.J. (1991) Explanatory concepts in physics: towards a principled evaluation of teaching materials. Computers and Education 17, 73-80.
16. Mazur E. (1997) Peer Instruction: a User's Manual. Prentice-Hall, NJ.
17. Meltzer D.E. & Manivannan K. (1996) Promoting interactivity in physics lecture classes. The Physics Teacher 34, 72-76.
18. Miyake N. (1986) Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science 10, 151-177.
19. Nicol D.J. & Boyle J.T. (2003) Peer instruction versus classwide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education 28, 458-473.
20. Steinert Y. & Snell L.S. (1999) Interactive lecturing: strategies for increasing participation in a large group presentations. Medical Teacher 21, 37-42.
21. Stuart S. & Brown M.I. (2003) Traditional and non-traditional resources: providing a well-supported learning environment. Association of Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J) 11(3), 58-68.
22. Tinto V. (1975) Dropout from Higher Education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research 45, 89-125.
23. Wit E. (2003) Who wants to be... The use of a Personal Response System in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3, 5-11.
24. Wood D., Wood H. & Middleton D. (1978) An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development 1, 131-147.