Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: One practitioner's application

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 95-102

  Stuart, S A J ^a   Brown, M I ^a   Draper, S W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Campus; Formative; Interactivity; Lecture; Philosophical logic; Portable; Summative

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042777529     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00075.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Brown M.I., Doughty G.F., Draper S.W., Henderson F.P. & McAteer E. (1996) Measuring learning resource use. Computers and Education 27, 103-113.
2. Draper S.W., Brown M.I., Henderson F.P. & McAteer E. (1996) Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL. Computers and Education 26, 17-32.
3. Draper S.W. & Brown M.I. (2004) Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94.
4. Draper S.W., Cargill J. & Cutts Q. (2002) Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 18, 13-23. Also available at http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/ilig/handsets.html.
5. Meltzer D.E. & Manivannan K. (1996) Promoting interactivity in physics lecture classes. The Physics Teacher 34, 72-76.
6. Stuart S. & Brown M.I. (2003) Traditional and non-traditional resources: providing a well-supported learning environment. Association of Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J) 11(3), 58-68.
7. Tomassi P. (1999) Logic. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.