The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 260-268

  Kennedy, G E ^a,c   Cutts, Q I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Electronic voting system; Engagement; Interactivity; Lectures

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944469429     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00133.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boyle J. & Nicol D. (2003) Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Association of Learning Technology Journal 11, 43-57.
2. Burnstein R. & Lederman L. (2001) Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. Physics Teacher 39, 8-11.
3. Crouch C. & Mazur E. (2001) Peer Instruction: ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69, 970-977.
4. Cue N. (1998) A universal tool for classrooms? Paper presented at the First Quality in Teaching and Learning Conference, 10-12 December 1998, Hong Kong International Trade and Exhibition Centre, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
5. Draper S. & Brown M. (2004) Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 81-94.
6. Draper S., Cargill J. & Cutts Q. (2001) Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 18, 13-23.
7. Dufresne R., Gerace W., Leonard W., Mestre J. & Wenk L. (1996) Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 7, 3-47.
8. Elliott C. (2003) Using a personal response system in economics teaching. International Review of Economics Education [On-line]. Available at: http://www.economics.ltsn.ac.uk/iree/il/elliott.htm.
9. Hake R. (1998) Interactive engagement vs. traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66, 64-74.
10. Hestenes D., Wells M. & Swackhammer G. (1992) Force concept inventory. Physics Teacher 30, 141-151.
11. Hestenes D. & Wells M. (1992) A mechanics baseline test. Physics Teacher 30, 159-166.
12. Irving A., Read M., Hunt A. & Knight S. (2000) Use of information technology in exam revision. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Assisted Assessment (eds H. Cooper & S. Clowes), pp. 211-221. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
13. Jones C., Connolly M., Gear A. & Read M. (2001) Group interactive learning with group process support technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 32, 571-581.
14. Mazur E. (1997) Peer Instruction: a User's Manual. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
15. Nicol D. & Boyle J. (2003) Peer instruction vs. class-wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education 28, 458-473.
16. Pickford R. & Clothier H. (2003) Ask the audience: A simple teaching method to improve the learning experience in large lectures. Paper presented at Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Databases, Coventry Technocentre, Coventry, UK.
17. Stewart S., Brown M. & Draper S. (2004) Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practitioner's application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 95-102.
18. Weinstein C. & Mayer R. (1986) The teaching of learning strategies. In Handbook of Research on Teaching (ed. M. Wittrock), pp. 315-327. Macmillan, New York.
19. Wit E. (2003) Who wants to be ... The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections 3, 5-11.