Monitoring the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation by the spindle assembly checkpoint

Cell Proliferation

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 391-400

  Silva, P ^a   Barbosa, J ^a   Nascimento, A V ^a   Faria, J ^a   Reis, R ^a   Bousbaa, H ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO E FORMAÇÃO AVANÇADA EM CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIAS DA SAÚDE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; GENE SILENCING; HUMAN; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANAPHASE; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; GENES, CDC; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASMS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 80053152679     PISSN: 09607722     EISSN: 13652184     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00767.x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Sen S (2000) Aneuploidy and cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 12, 82-88.
2. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW (2009) Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 478-487.
3. Tanaka TU (2008) Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle. Chromosoma 117, 521-533.
4. Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393.
5. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ (2001) Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936.
6. Holy TE, Leibler S (1994) Dynamic instability of microtubules as an efficient way to search in space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5682-5685.
7. Cheeseman IM, Desai A (2008) Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 33-46.
8. DeLuca JG, Dong Y, Hergert P, Strauss J, Hickey JM, Salmon ED et al. (2005) Hec1 and nuf2 are core components of the kinetochore outer plate essential for organizing microtubule attachment sites. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 519-531.
9. Kline SL, Cheeseman IM, Hori T, Fukagawa T, Desai A (2006) The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 173, 9-17.
10. Sharp DJ, Rogers GC, Scholey JM (2000) Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 922-930.
11. Vaisberg EA, Koonce MP, McIntosh JR (1993) Cytoplasmic dynein plays a role in mammalian mitotic spindle formation. J. Cell Biol. 123, 849-858.
12. Vaughan KT, Mikami A, Paschal BM, Holzbaur EL, Hughes SM, Echeverri CJ et al. (1996) Multiple mouse chromosomal loci for dynein-based motility. Genomics 36, 29-38.
13. Vorozhko VV, Emanuele MJ, Kallio MJ, Stukenberg PT, Gorbsky GJ (2008) Multiple mechanisms of chromosome movement in vertebrate cells mediated through the Ndc80 complex and dynein/dynactin. Chromosoma 117, 169-179.
14. Yang Z, Tulu US, Wadsworth P, Rieder CL (2007) Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 17, 973-980.
15. Karess R (2005) Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 386-392.
16. Starr DA, Williams BC, Hays TS, Goldberg ML (1998) ZW10 helps recruit dynactin and dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 142, 763-774.
17. Griffis ER, Stuurman N, Vale RD (2007) Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 177, 1005-1015.
18. Gassmann R, Essex A, Hu JS, Maddox PS, Motegi F, Sugimoto A et al. (2008) A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev. 22, 2385-2399.
19. Chan YW, Fava LL, Uldschmid A, Schmitz MH, Gerlich DW, Nigg EA et al. (2009) Mitotic control of kinetochore-associated dynein and spindle orientation by human Spindly. J. Cell Biol. 185, 859-874.
20. Barisic M, Sohm B, Mikolcevic P, Wandke C, Rauch V, Ringer T et al. (2010) Spindly/CCDC99 is required for efficient chromosome congression and mitotic checkpoint regulation. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 1968-1981.
21. Hanisch A, Sillje HH, Nigg EA (2006) Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2. EMBO J. 25, 5504-5515.
22. Gaitanos TN, Santamaria A, Jeyaprakash AA, Wang B, Conti E, Nigg EA (2009) Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J. 28, 1442-1452.
23. Guimaraes GJ, Deluca JG (2009) Connecting with Ska, a key complex at the kinetochore-microtubule interface. EMBO J. 28, 1375-1377.
24. Kops GJ, Saurin AT, Meraldi P (2010) Finding the middle ground: how kinetochores power chromosome congression. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 2145-2161.
25. Kapoor TM, Lampson MA, Hergert P, Cameron L, Cimini D, Salmon ED et al. (2006) Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311, 388-391.
26. Tanaka TU (2005) Chromosome bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 581-589.
27. Kelly AE, Funabiki H (2009) Correcting aberrant kinetochore microtubule attachments: an Aurora B-centric view. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 51-58.
28. Nicklas RB, Ward SC, Gorbsky GJ (1995) Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130, 929-939.
29. King JM, Nicklas RB (2000) Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 113(Pt 21), 3815-3823.
30. Liu D, Lampson MA (2009) Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Aurora B kinase. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 37, 976-980.
31. Ruchaud S, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC (2007) The chromosomal passenger complex: one for all and all for one. Cell 131, 230-231.
32. Tanaka TU, Rachidi N, Janke C, Pereira G, Galova M, Schiebel E et al. (2002) Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317-329.
33. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A (2006) The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127, 983-997.
34. Lan W, Zhang X, Kline-Smith SL, Rosasco SE, Barrett-Wilt GA, Shabanowitz J et al. (2004) Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr. Biol. 14, 273-286.
35. Weaver BA, Cleveland DW (2005) Decoding the links between mitosis, cancer, and chemotherapy: the mitotic checkpoint, adaptation, and cell death. Cancer Cell 8, 7-12.
36. Thompson SL, Bakhoum SF, Compton DA (2010) Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol. 20, R285-R295.
37. Pinsky BA, Biggins S (2005) The spindle checkpoint: tension versus attachment. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 486-493.
38. Logarinho E, Bousbaa H, Dias JM, Lopes C, Amorim I, Antunes-Martins A et al. (2004) Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores in Drosophila cells. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1757-1771.
39. Li X, Nicklas RB (1995) Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373, 630-632.
40. Stern BM, Murray AW (2001) Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 11, 1462-1467.
41. Skoufias DA, Andreassen PR, Lacroix FB, Wilson L, Margolis RL (2001) Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4492-4497.
42. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G (1995) The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130, 941-948.
43. Zhou J, Yao J, Joshi HC (2002) Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3547-3555.
44. Gorbsky GJ, Ricketts WA (1993) Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1311-1321.
45. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Salmon ED (1998) Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1181-1191.
46. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED (2010) Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J. Cell Sci. 123, 825-835.
47. McEwen BF, Dong Y (2009) Releasing the spindle assembly checkpoint without tension. J. Cell Biol. 184, 355-356.
48. Khodjakov A, Rieder CL (2009) The nature of cell-cycle checkpoints: facts and fallacies. J. Biol. 8, 88.
49. Bharadwaj R, Yu H (2004) The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene 23, 2016-2027.
50. McCurdy JD, McElroy JS, Kopsell DA, Sams CE, Sorochan JC (2008) Effects of mesotrione on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) carotenoid concentrations under varying environmental conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 9133-9139.
51. Kramer ER, Gieffers C, Holzl G, Hengstschlager M, Peters JM (1998) Activation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by proteins of the CDC20/Fizzy family. Curr. Biol. 8, 1207-1210.
52. De Antoni A, Pearson CG, Cimini D, Canman JC, Sala V, Nezi L et al. (2005) The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15, 214-225.
53. Luo X, Yu H (2008) Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2. Structure 16, 1616-1625.
54. Skinner JJ, Wood S, Shorter J, Englander SW, Black BE (2008) The Mad2 partial unfolding model: regulating mitosis through Mad2 conformational switching. J. Cell Biol. 183, 761-768.
55. Yu H (2006) Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model. J. Cell Biol. 173, 153-157.
56. Bolanos-Garcia VM, Blundell TL (2010) BUB1 and BUBR1: multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 141-150.
57. Zich J, Hardwick KG (2010) Getting down to the phosphorylated 'nuts and bolts' of spindle checkpoint signalling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 18-27.
58. Tang Z, Shu H, Oncel D, Chen S, Yu H (2004) Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 provides a catalytic mechanism for APC/C inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Mol. Cell 16, 387-397.
59. Chen RH (2004) Phosphorylation and activation of Bub1 on unattached chromosomes facilitate the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 23, 3113-3121.
60. Yamaguchi S, Decottignies A, Nurse P (2003) Function of Cdc2p-dependent Bub1p phosphorylation and Bub1p kinase activity in the mitotic and meiotic spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 22, 1075-1087.
61. Mao Y, Abrieu A, Cleveland DW (2003) Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell 114, 87-98.
62. Huang H, Yen TJ (2009) BubR1 is an effector of multiple mitotic kinases that specifies kinetochore: microtubule attachments and checkpoint. Cell Cycle 8, 1164-1167.
63. Malureanu LA, Jeganathan KB, Hamada M, Wasilewski L, Davenport J, van Deursen JM (2009) BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev. Cell 16, 118-131.
64. Zhang J, Ahmad S, Mao Y (2007) BubR1 and APC/EB1 cooperate to maintain metaphase chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 178, 773-784.
65. Dorer RK, Zhong S, Tallarico JA, Wong WH, Mitchison TJ, Murray AW (2005) A small-molecule inhibitor of Mps1 blocks the spindle-checkpoint response to a lack of tension on mitotic chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 15, 1070-1076.
66. Schmidt M, Budirahardja Y, Klompmaker R, Medema RH (2005) Ablation of the spindle assembly checkpoint by a compound targeting Mps1. EMBO Rep. 6, 866-872.
67. Santaguida S, Tighe A, D'Alise AM, Taylor SS, Musacchio A (2010) Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190, 73-87.
68. Jelluma N, Brenkman AB, van den Broek NJ, Cruijsen CW, van Osch MH, Lens SM et al. (2008) Mps1 phosphorylates Borealin to control Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment. Cell 132, 233-246.
69. Hardwick KG, Weiss E, Luca FC, Winey M, Murray AW (1996) Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 273, 953-956.
70. Fuller BG, Stukenberg PT (2009) Cell division: righting the check. Curr. Biol. 19, R550-R553.
71. Vanoosthuyse V, Hardwick KG (2009) Overcoming inhibition in the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 23, 2799-2805.
72. Howell BJ, McEwen BF, Canman JC, Hoffman DB, Farrar EM, Rieder CL et al. (2001) Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1159-1172.
73. Sivaram MV, Wadzinski TL, Redick SD, Manna T, Doxsey SJ (2009) Dynein light intermediate chain 1 is required for progress through the spindle assembly checkpoint. EMBO J. 28, 902-914.
74. Xia G, Luo X, Habu T, Rizo J, Matsumoto T, Yu H (2004) Conformation-specific binding of p31(comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 23, 3133-3143.
75. Yang M, Li B, Tomchick DR, Machius M, Rizo J, Yu H et al. (2007) p31comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 131, 744-755.
76. Wassmann K, Liberal V, Benezra R (2003) Mad2 phosphorylation regulates its association with Mad1 and the APC/C. EMBO J. 22, 797-806.
77. Vanoosthuyse V, Hardwick KG (2009) A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism. Curr. Biol. 19, 1176-1181.
78. Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, Riggins GJ, Willson JK, Markowitz SD et al. (1998) Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 392, 300-303.
79. Kops GJ, Weaver BA, Cleveland DW (2005) On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 773-785.
80. Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A, Kirchwegger R, Pasche B, Gerald W et al. (2001) MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature 409, 355-359.
81. Babu JR, Jeganathan KB, Baker DJ, Wu X, Kang-Decker N, van Deursen JM (2003) Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation. J. Cell Biol. 160, 341-353.
82. Dai W, Wang Q, Liu T, Swamy M, Fang Y, Xie S et al. (2004) Slippage of mitotic arrest and enhanced tumor development in mice with BubR1 haploinsufficiency. Cancer Res. 64, 440-445.
83. Logarinho E, Bousbaa H (2008) Kinetochore-microtubule interactions "in check" by Bub1, Bub3 and BubR1: the dual task of attaching and signalling. Cell Cycle 7, 1763-1768.
84. Logarinho E, Resende T, Torres C, Bousbaa H (2008) The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 1798-1813.
85. Meraldi P, Sorger PK (2005) A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J. 24, 1621-1633.
86. Lampson MA, Kapoor TM (2005) The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 93-98.
87. Tighe A, Johnson VL, Albertella M, Taylor SS (2001) Aneuploid colon cancer cells have a robust spindle checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 2, 609-614.
88. Gascoigne KE, Taylor SS (2008) Cancer cells display profound intra- and interline variation following prolonged exposure to antimitotic drugs. Cancer Cell 14, 111-122.
89. Basu J, Bousbaa H, Logarinho E, Li Z, Williams BC, Lopes C et al. (1999) Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 146, 13-28.
90. Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW (2004) Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8699-8704.
91. Bolanos-Garcia VM (2009) Assessment of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) as the target of anticancer therapies. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 9, 131-141.
92. Przewloka MR, Glover DM (2009) The kinetochore and the centromere: a working long distance relationship. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 439-465.
93. Kops GJ (2008) The kinetochore and spindle checkpoint in mammals. Front Biosci. 13, 3606-3620.
94. Santaguida S, Musacchio A (2009) The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28, 2511-2531.