Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection

Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 89-121

  Vrij, Aldert ^a   Granhag, Pär Anders ^b   Porter, Stephen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953249125     PISSN: 15291006     EISSN: 15396053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1529100610390861     Document Type: Article

References (319)

1. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58.
2. Albrechtsen, J.S., Meissner, C.A., & Susa, K.J. (2009). Can intuition improve deception detection performance? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1052-1055.
3. Allwood, C.M., & Granhag, P.A. (1999). Feelings of confidence and the realism of confidence judgments in everyday life. In P. Juslin, & H. Montgomery (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: Neo- Brunswikian and process-tracing approaches (pp. 123-146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ambady, N., Bernieri, F.J., & Richeson, J.A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behaviour: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioural stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201-271.
5. Anderson, C.A., Lepper, M.R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.
6. Anderson, D.E., Ansfield, M.E., & DePaulo, B.M. (1999). Love's best habit: Deception in the context of relationships. In P. Philippot, R.S. Feldman, & E.J. Coats (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior (pp. 372-409). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Anderson, D.E., DePaulo, B.M., Ansfield, M.E., Tickle, J.J., & Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom? Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 23, 67-89.
8. Arntzen, F. (1970). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage [Psychology of testimony]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
9. Arntzen, F. (1982). Die Situation der forensischen Aussagenpsychologie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 107-120). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Arntzen, F. (1983). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage: Systematik der Glaubwürdigkeitsmerkmale [Psychology of testimony: A systematic approach of credibility assessment]. München, Germany: Beck.
11. Backbier, E., Hoogstraten, J., & Terwogt-Kouwenhoven Meerum K. (1997). Situational determinants of the acceptability of telling lies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1048-1062.
12. Bageley, J., & Manelis, L. (1979). Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 591-594.
13. Baldry, A.C., & Winkel, F.W. (1998). Perceptions of the credibility and eventual value of victim and suspect statements in interviews. In J. Boros, I. Munnich, & M. Szegedi (Eds.), Psychology and criminal justice: International review of theory and practice (pp. 74-82). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
14. Baldry, A.C., Winkel, F.W., & Enthoven, D.S. (1997). Paralinguistic and nonverbal triggers of biased credibility assessments of rape victims in Dutch police officers: An experimental study of "nonevidentiary" bias. In S. Redondo, V. Garrido, J. Perze, & R. Barbaret (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 163-174). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
15. Bar, M., Neta, M., & Linz, H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269-278.
16. Barrett, E.C. (2005). Psychological research and police investigations: Does the research meet the needs? In L. Alison (Ed.), The forensic psychologist's casebook (pp. 47-67). Devon, England: Willan.
17. Baumeister, R.F. (1998). The self. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680-740). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
18. Bavelas, J.B., & Chovil, N. (2006). Nonverbal and verbal communication: Hand gestures and facial displays as part of language use in face-to-face dialogue. In V. Manusov, & M.L. Patterson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 97-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Bavelas, J.B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394-405.
20. Bavelas, J.B., & Gerwing, J. (2007). Conversational hand gestures and facial displays in face-to-face dialogue. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 283-307). New York: Psychology Press.
21. Beattie, G.W. (1981). A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 243-248.
22. Bell, K.L., & DePaulo, B.M. (1996). Liking and lying. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 243-266.
23. Blair, J.P., & Kooi, B. (2004). The gap between training and research in the detection of deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 6, 77-83.
24. Bok, S. (1989). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Random House.
25. Bollingmo, G., Wessel, E., Sandvold, Y., Eilertsen, D.E., & Magnussen, S. (2009). The effect of biased and non-biased information on judgements of witness credibility. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 61-71.
26. Bond, C.F. (2008). A few can catch a liar, sometimes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1298-1300.
27. Bond, C.F., & DePaulo, B.M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
28. Bond, C.F., & DePaulo, B.M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477-492.
29. Bond, C.F., & Fahey, W.E. (1987). False suspicion and the misperception of deceit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 41-46.
30. Bond, C.F., & Uysal, A. (2007). On lie detection "wizards." Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109-115.
31. Bond, G.D. (2009). Deception detection expertise. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 339-351.
32. Bond, G.D., Malloy, D.M., Thompson, L.A., Arias, E.A., & Nunn, S. (2004). Post-probe decision making in a prison context. Communication Monographs, 71, 269-285.
33. Bothwell, R., & Jalil, M. (1992). The credibility of nervous witnesses. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 581-586.
34. Brant, C. (1993). Communication patterns in Indians: Verbal and nonverbal. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 6, 259-269.
35. Bull, P. (2009). Detecting deceit: Current issues. In T. Williamson, B. Milne, & S.P. Savage (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing (pp. 190-206). Cullompton, England: Willan.
36. Bull, R., & McAlpine, S. (1998). Facial appearance and criminality. In A. Memon, A. Vrij, & R. Bull (Eds.), Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (pp. 59-76). London: McGraw-Hill.
37. Buller, D.B., & Aune, R.K. (1988). The effects of vocalics and nonverbal sensitivity on compliance: A speech accommodation theory explanation. Human Communication Research, 14, 301-332.
38. Buller, D.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-242.
39. Buller, D.B., Comstock, J., Aune, R.K., & Strzyzewski, K.D. (1989). The effect of probing on deceivers and truthtellers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 155-170.
40. Buller, D.B., Strzyzewski, K.D., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1-24.
41. Burgess, A.W. (1985). Rape and sexual assault: A research book. London: Garland.
42. Burgess, A.W., & Homstrom, L.L. (1974). Rape: Victims of crisis. Bowie, MD: Brady.
43. Burgoon, J.K., Blair, J.P., & Strom, R.E. (2008). Cognitive biases and nonverbal cue availability in deception detection. Human Communication Research, 34, 572-599.
44. Burgoon, J.K., & Buller, D.B. (1994). Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal dynamics. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 155-184.
45. Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., Floyd, K., & Grandpre, J. (1996). Deceptive realities: Sender, receiver, and observer perspectives in deceptive conversations. Communication Research, 23, 724-748.
46. Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., White, C.H., Afifi, W., & Buslig, A.L.S. (1999). The role of conversation involvement in deceptive interpersonal interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 669-685.
47. Caso, L., Maricchiolo, F., Bonaiuto, M., Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2006). The impact of deception and suspicion on different hand movements. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 1-19.
48. Caso, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & de Leo, G. (2006). Deceptive responses: The impact of verbal and nonverbal countermeasures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 99-111.
49. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
50. Colwell, L.H., Miller, H.A., Lyons, P.M., & Miller, R.S. (2006). The training of law enforcement officers in detecting deception: A survey of current practices and suggestions for improving accuracy. Police Quarterly, 9, 275-290.
51. Dalton, A.L., & Daneman, M. (2006). Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation. Memory, 14, 486-501.
52. Darley, J.M., & Gross, P.H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labelling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20-33.
53. Davies, G.M. (1991). Research on children's testimony: Implications for interviewing practice. In C.R. Hollin, & K. Howells (Eds.), Clinical approaches to sex offenders and their victims (pp. 177-191). New York: Wiley.
54. Davis, M., & Hadiks, D. (1995). Demeanor and credibility. Semiotica, 106, 5-54.
55. DePaulo, B.M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203-243.
56. DePaulo, B.M. (2004). The many faces of lies. In A.G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 303-236). New York: Guilford Press.
57. DePaulo, B.M., Blank, A.L., Swaim, G.W., & Hairfield, J.G. (1992). Expressiveness and expressive control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 276-285.
58. DePaulo, B.M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. L., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346-357.
59. DePaulo, B.M., Epstein, J.A., & LeMay, C.S. (1990). Responses of the socially anxious to the prospect of interpersonal evaluation. Journal of Personality, 58, 623-640.
60. DePaulo, B.M., & Friedman, H.S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 3-40). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
61. DePaulo, B.M., Kashy, D.A., Kirkendol, S.E., Wyer, M.M., & Epstein, J.A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
62. DePaulo, B.M., & Kirkendol, S.E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J.C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51-70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
63. DePaulo, B.M., Kirkendol, S.E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T.P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177-202.
64. DePaulo, B.M., Lanier, K., & Davis, T. (1983). Detecting deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096-1103.
65. DePaulo, B.M., LeMay, C.S., & Epstein, J.A. (1991). Effects of importance of success and expectations for success on effectiveness at deceiving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 14-24.
66. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.L., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
67. DePaulo, B.M., & Pfeifer, R.L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249-267.
68. DePaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R., Eisenstat, R.A., Rogers, P.L., & Finkelstein, S. (1978). Decoding discrepant nonverbal cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 313-323.
69. DePaulo, B.M., Stone, J.I., & Lassiter, G.D. (1985). Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1191-1203.
70. Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., & Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement of visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38, 438-445.
71. Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F.G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory and Cognition, 33, 727-733.
72. Dumas, R., & Testé, B. (2006). The influence of criminal facial stereotypes on juridic judgments. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 237-244.
73. Ekman, P. (1997). Deception, lying, and demeanor. In D.F. Halpern, & A.E. Voiskounsky (Eds.), States of mind: American and post-Soviet perspectives on contemporary issues in psychology (pp. 93-105). New York: Oxford University Press.
74. Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1985).
75. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32, 88-106.
76. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
77. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (2006). From flawed self-assessment to blatant whoppers: The utility of voluntary and involuntary behavior in detecting deception. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 24, 673-686.
78. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M.G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
79. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M.G. (2008). Scoring and reporting: A response to Bond (2008). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1315-1317.
80. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W.V., & Scherer, K. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125-135.
81. Elaad, E. (2003). Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 349-363.
82. Feeley, T.H., & Young, M.J. (2000). The effects of cognitive capacity on beliefs about deceptive communication. Communication Quarterly, 48, 101-119.
83. Feldman, S.S., & Cauffman, E. (1999). Sexual betrayal among late adolescents: Perspectives of the perpetrator and the aggrieved. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 235-258.
84. Fiedler, K., & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.
85. Fisher, R.P., Brennan, K.H., & McCauley, M.R. (2002). The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall. In M.L. Eisen, J.A. Quas, & G.S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 265-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Fisher, R.P., Vrij, A., & Leins, D.A. (in press). Inconsistency as a predictor of memory inaccuracy and lying. In B.S. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment New York, NY: Springer.
87. Ford, E.B. (2006). Lie detection: Historical, neuropsychiatric and legal dimensions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 159-177.
88. Fowler, K.A., Lilienfeld, S.O., & Patrick, C.J. (2009). Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior. Psychological Assessment, 21, 68-78.
89. Frank, M.G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1429-1439.
90. Frank, M.G., & Feeley, T.H. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 58-75.
91. Frank, M.G., Yarbrough, J.D., & Ekman, P. (2006). Investigative interviewing and the detection of deception. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research and regulation (pp. 229-255). Cullompton, England: Willan.
92. Freedman, N. (1972). The analysis of movement behavior during the clinical interview. In A.R. Siegman, & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 153-175). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
93. Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S.M., Stose, S., Thompson, W.L., & Yurgelun- Todd, D.A. (2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception: An fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830-836.
94. Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2004). Police officers' credibility judgements: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 254-275.
95. Geiselman, R.E., Callot, R. (1990). Reverse versus forward recall of script-based texts. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141-144.
96. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M.,&the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
97. Gilbert, D.T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
98. Gilbert, J.A.E., & Fisher, R.P. (2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 723-739.
99. Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V.H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-346.
100. Glenberg, A.M., Schroeder, J.L., & Robertson, D.A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 651-658.
101. The Global Deception Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60-74.
102. Goodman, G.S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush, & J. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249-284). New York: Cambridge University Press.
103. Granhag, P.A. (2010). On the psycho-legal study of true and false intentions: Dangerous waters and some stepping stones. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 37-43.
104. Granhag, P.A., Andersson, L.O., Strömwall, L.A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals' beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103-119.
105. Granhag, P.A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mindreading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189-200.
106. Granhag, P.A., & Knieps, M. (in press). Episodic future thought: Illuminating the trademarks of true and false intent. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
107. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (1999). Repeated interrogations: Stretching the deception detection paradigm. Expert Evidence: The International Journal of Behavioural Sciences in Legal Contexts, 7, 163-174.
108. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2000a). "Let's go over this again...": Effects of repeated interrogations on deception detection performance. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz-Obydzinska, & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law: Traditional questions and new ideas (pp. 191-196). Kraków, Poland: Institute of Forensic Research.
109. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2000b). Deception detection: Examining the consistency heuristic. In C.M. Breur, M.M. Kommer, J.F. Nijboer, & J.M. Reintjes (Eds.), New trends in criminal investigation and evidence (Vol. 2, pp. 309-321). Antwerpen, Belgium: Intresentia.
110. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2001). Deception detection: Interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 603-620.
111. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-257.
112. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
113. Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L.A., & Hartwig, M. (2005). Granting asylum or not? Migration board personnel's beliefs about deception. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 29-50.
114. Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L.A., & Hartwig, M. (2007). The SUE technique: The way to interview to detect deception. Forensic Update, 88, 25-29.
115. Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L.A., & Jonsson, A.C. (2003). Partners in crime: How liars in collusion betray themselves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 848-868.
116. Granhag, P.A., & Vrij, A. (2010). Interviewing to detect deception. In P.A. Granhag (Ed.), Forensic psychology in context: Nordic andinternational approaches (pp. 75-93). Cullompton, England: Willan.
117. Greely, H., & Illes, J. (2007). Neuroscience-based lie detection: The urgent need for regulation. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 33, 377-431.
118. Greuel, L. (1992). Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases. In F. Lösel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 234-239). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
119. Gudjonsson, G.H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Chichester, England: Wiley.
120. Hale, J.L., & Stiff, J.B. (1990). Nonverbal primacy in veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 3, 75-83.
121. Hare, R.D. (2006). Psychopathy: A clinical and forensic overview. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29, 709-724.
122. Hartwig, M., & Bond, C.F. (2010). Why do lie-catchers fail? A Brunswikian lens model of human lie judgments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
123. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects' strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 213-227.
124. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L., & Doering, N. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic selfregulation of innocent and guilty suspects [Special issue]. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 10-16.
125. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603-619.
126. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L., & Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 469-484.
127. Henig, R.M. (2006, February 5). Looking for the lie. The New York Times. Retrieved July 12, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/magazine/05lying.html
128. Hirsch, A.R., & Wolf, C.J. (2001). Practical methods for detecting mendacity: A case study. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 438-444.
129. Hocking, J.E., & Leathers, D.G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 47, 119-131.
130. Horvath, F., Jayne, B., & Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behavioral analysis interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793-807.
131. Inbau, F.E., Reid, J.E., Buckley, J.P., & Jayne, B.C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions. (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
132. Joffe, R., & Yuille, J.C. (1992, May). Criteria-based content analysis: An experimental investigation. Paper presented at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Advanced Study Institute on the Child Witness in Context: Cognitive, Social and Legal Perspectives, Lucca, Italy.
133. Johnson, R.R. (2006a). Confounding influences on police detection of suspiciousness. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 435-442.
134. Johnson, R.R. (2006b). Race and police reliance on suspicious nonverbal cues. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 277-290.
135. Kahana, M.J. (1996). Associate retrieval processes in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 24, 103-109.
136. Kalbfleisch, P.J. (1992). Deceit, distrust and the social milieu: Application of deception research in a troubled world. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 308-334.
137. Kassin, S.M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215-228.
138. Kassin, S.M. (2008a). Confession evidence: Commonsense myths and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1309-1322.
139. Kassin, S.M. (2008b). The psychology of confessions. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 4, 193-217.
140. Kassin, S.M., Appleby, S.C., & Torkildson-Perillo, J. (2010). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 39-56.
141. Kassin, S.M., & Fong, C.T. (1999). "I'm innocent!": Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
142. Kassin, S.M., Goldstein, C.J., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187-203.
143. Kassin, S.M., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.
144. Kassin, S.M., Meissner, C.A., & Norwick, R.J. (2005). "I'd know a false confession if I saw one": A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 211-227.
145. Kassin, S.M., & Norwick, R.J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.
146. Kaufmann, G., Drevland, G.C., Wessel, E., Overskeid, G., & Magnussen, S. (2003). The importance of being earnest: Displayed emotions and witness credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 21-34.
147. Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175-200.
148. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
149. Kleinke, C L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78-100.
150. Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 766-776.
151. Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements. Does it work? Social Behaviour, 2, 1-17.
152. Köhnken, G. (2002). A German perspective on children's testimony. In H.L. Westcott, G.M. Davies, & R.H.C. Bull (Eds.), Children's testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 233-244). Chichester, England: Wiley.
153. Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the "detection of the truth." In P.A. Granhag, & L.A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 41-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
154. Kowalski, R.M., Walker, S., Wilkinson, R., Queen, A., & Sharpe, B. (2003). Lying, cheating, complaining, and other aversive interpersonal behaviors: A narrative examination of the darker sideof relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 471-490.
155. Krauss, R.M. (1981). Impression formation, impression management, and nonverbal behaviors. In E.T. Higgins, C.P. Herman, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 323-341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
156. LaFrance, M., & Mayo, C. (1976). Racial differences in gaze behavior during conversations: Two systematic observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 547-552.
157. LaFrance,M.,&Mayo, C. (1978).Cultural aspects of nonverbal communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2, 71-89.
158. Landry, K., & Brigham, J.C. (1992). The effect of training in criteriabased content analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-675.
159. Lane, J.D., & DePaulo, B.M. (1999). Completing Coyne's cycle: Dysphorics' ability to detect deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 311-329.
160. Leal, S., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2010). Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid. Acta Psychologica, 134, 323-329.
161. Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
162. Leins, D., Fisher, R.P., Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Mann, S. (in press). Using sketch-drawing to induce inconsistency: An active approach to detecting deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology.
163. Leo, R.A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266-303.
164. Lerner, M.J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum Press.
165. Levine, T.R., Asada, K.J.K., & Park, H.S. (2006). The lying chicken and the gaze avoidant egg: Eye contact, deception and causal order. Southern Journal of Communication, 4, 401-411.
166. Levine, T.R., Feeley, T.H., McCornack, S.A., Hughes, M., & Harms, C.M. (2005). Testing the effects of nonverbal behavior training on accuracy in deception detection with the inclusion of a bogus training control group. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 203-217.
167. Levine, T.R., & McCornack, S.A. (1992). Linking love and lies: A formal test of the McCornack and Parks model of deception detection. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 143-154.
168. Levine, T.R., & McCornack, S.A. (1996a). A critical analysis of the behavioral adaptation explanation of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 22, 575-588.
169. Levine, T.R., & McCornack, S.A. (1996b). Can behavioral adaptation explain the probing effect? Human Communication Research, 22, 604-613.
170. Levine, T.R., & McCornack, S.A. (2001). Behavioural adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 471-502.
171. Levine, T.R., Park, H.S., & McCornack, S.A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the "veracity effect." Communication Monographs, 66, 125-144.
172. Lindholm, T. (2008). Who can judge the accuracy of eyewitness statements? A comparison of professionals and lay-persons. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1301-1314.
173. Littmann, E., & Szewczyk, H. (1983). Zu einigen Kriterien und Ergebnissen forensisch-psychologischer Glaubwürdigkeitsbegutachtung von sexuell mißbrauchten Kindern und Jugendlichen [Criteria to be examined in forensic-psychological credibility assessment in child sexual abuse cases]. Forensia, 4, 55-72.
174. Liu, M, Granhag, P.A., Landström, S., Roosaf Hjelmsäter, E., Strömwall, L.A., & Vrij, A. (2010). "Can you remember what was in your pocket when you were stung by a bee?"-Eliciting cues to deception by asking the unanticipated. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 31-36.
175. Loftus, E.F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12, 361-366.
176. Loftus, E.F., & Palmer, J.C. (1974). Reconstructions of automobile destruction:Anexample of the interaction between language andmemory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
177. Lord, C.G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
178. Macrae, C.N., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2001). Social cognition: Categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 239-256.
179. Malone, B.E., & DePaulo, B.M. (2001). Measuring sensitivity to deception. In J.A. Hall, & F.J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 103-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
180. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stakes liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365-376.
181. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect deceit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137-149.
182. Masip, J., Sporer, S., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 11, 99-122.
183. Matarazzo, J.D., Wiens, A.N., Jackson, R.H., & Manaugh, T.S. (1970). Interviewee speech behavior under conditions of endogenously-present and exogenously-induced motivational states. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 17-24.
184. McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92, 350-371.
185. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
186. Meissner, C.A., & Kassin, S.M. (2002). "He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469-480.
187. Millar, M.G., & Millar, K.U. (1998). The effects of suspicion on the recall of cues used to make veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 11, 57-64.
188. Miller, G.R., & Stiff, J.B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Moston, S.J. (1992). Truth or lies. Policing, 8, 26-39.
189. Moston, S.J., & Engelberg, T. (1993). Police questioning techniques in tape recorded interviews with criminal suspects. Policing and Society, 6, 61-75.
190. Moston, S.J., Stephenson, G.M., & Williamson, T.M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23-39.
191. National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
192. Noller, P. (1985). Video primacy-A further look. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 28-47.
193. Ofshe, R.J., & Leo, R.A. (1997). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979-1112.
194. O'Sullivan, M. (2007). Unicorns or Tiger Woods: Are lie detection experts myths or rarities? A response to "On Lie Detection 'Wizards"' by Bond and Uysal. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 117-123.
195. O'Sullivan, M. (2008). Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 134, 493-497.
196. O'Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In P.A. Granhag & L.A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 269-286). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
197. O'Sullivan, M., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 203-216.
198. O'Sullivan, M., Frank, M.G., Hurley, C.M., & Tiwana, J. (in press). Police lie detection accuracy: The effect of lie scenario. Law and Human Behavior.
199. Park, H.S., Levine, T.R., McCornack, S.A., Morrisson, K., & Ferrara, M. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69, 144-157.
200. Patterson, M.L. (1995). Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 3-29.
201. Patterson,M.L. (2006). The evolution of theories of interactive behavior. In V.Manusov,&M.L. Patterson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 21-39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
202. Pickel, K.L. (2004). When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of selfgenerated misinformation on eyewitness memory. Memory, 12, 14-26.
203. Porter, S., England, L., Juodis, M., Brinke, Ten L., & Wilson, K. (2008). Is the face the window to the soul?: Investigation of the accuracy of intuitive judgments of the trustworthiness of human faces. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40, 171-177.
204. Porter, S., Gustaw, C., & Brinke, Ten L. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology Crime & Law, 16, 477-491.
205. Porter, S., Juodis, M., Brinke, Ten L., Klein, R., & Wilson, K. (2010). Evaluation of a brief deception detection training program. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21, 66-76.
206. Porter, S., & Peace, K. (2007). The scars of memory: A prospective, longitudinal investigation of the consistency of traumatic and positive emotional memories in adulthood. Psychological Science, 18, 435-441.
207. Porter, S., Spencer, L., & Birt, A. (2003). Blinded by emotion? Effect of emotionality of a scene on susceptibility to false memories. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 35, 165-175.
208. Porter, S., & Brinke, Ten L. (2008). Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19, 508-514.
209. Porter, S., & Brinke, Ten L. (2009). Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 119-134.
210. Porter, S., & Brinke, Ten L. (2010). Truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? [Special issue]. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 57-76.
211. Porter, S., & Woodworth, M. (2007). I'm sorry I did it but he started it: A comparison of the official and self-reported homicide descriptions of psychopath and non-psychopaths. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 91-107.
212. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A.R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643-658.
213. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., McCabe, S., & Peace, K.A. (2007). "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration" or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 297-310.
214. Porter, S., & Yuille, J.C. (1995). Credibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 319-331.
215. Porter, S., & Yuille, J.C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-459.
216. Porter, S., Yuille, J.C., & Lehman, D.R. (1999). The nature of real, implanted and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 517-537.
217. Quas, J.A., Davis, E.L., Goodman, G.S., & Myers, J.E.B. (2007). Repeated questions, deception, and children's true and false reports of body touch. Child Maltreatment, 12, 60-67. R. v. Lifchus, 3 S.C.R. 320 (1997).
218. Reinhard, M.A., & Sporer, S.L. (2008). Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 477-488.
219. Reinhard, M.A., Sporer, S.L., & Marksteiner, T. (2009). Situational familiarity and the use of nonverbal and verbal information in judgments of veracity.Manuscript under review.
220. Riggio, R.E. (1994). Epilogue: Where are we going, and how do we get there? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 514-518.
221. Riggio, R.E., Tucker, J., & Throckmorton, B. (1988). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 568-577.
222. Robinson, W.P. (1994). Reactions to falsifications in public and interpersonal contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 497-513.
223. Roney, J.R., Hanson, K.N., Durante, K.M., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). Reading men's faces: Women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 2169-2175.
224. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advancesin experimental psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
225. Rotenberg, K.J., & Sullivan, C. (2003). Children's use of gaze and limb movement cues to infer deception. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 175-187.
226. Ruby, C.L., & Brigham, J.C. (1997). The usefulness of the criteriabased content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705-737.
227. Schacter, D.L., & Addis, R.D. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 392, 773-786.
228. Schlenker, B.R., & Leary, M.R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669.
229. Schubert, S. (2006). A look tells all. Scientific American Mind. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id1/4a-look-tells-all
230. Schweitzer, M.E., Brodt, S.E., & Croson, R.T.A. (2002). Seeing and believing: Visual access and the strategic use of deception. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 258-275.
231. Schweitzer, M.E., Hershey, J.C., & Bradlow, E.T. (2006). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 1-9.
232. Seiter, J.S., Bruschke, J., & Bai, C. (2002). The acceptability of deception as a function of perceivers' culture, deceiver's intention, and deceiver-deceived relationship. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 158-180.
233. Spence, S.A. (2008). Playing devil's advocate: The case against fMRI lie detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 11-26.
234. Spence, S.A., Farrow, T.F.D., Herford, A.E., Wilkinson, I.D., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P.W.R. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 2849-2853.
235. Sporer, S.L. (2004). Reality monitoring and detection of deception. In P.A. Granhag, & L.A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 64-102). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
236. Sporer, S.L., Penrod, S.D., Read, J.D., & Cutler, B.L. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
237. Sporer, S.L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421-446.
238. Sporer, S.L., & Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1-34.
239. Stiff, J.B., Corman, S., Krizek, B., & Snider, E. (1994). Individual differences and changes in nonverbal behavior: Unmasking the changing faces of deception. Communication Research, 21, 555-581.
240. Stiff, J.B., Kim, H.J., & Ramesh, C.N. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19, 326-345.
241. Stiff, J.B., & Miller, G.R. (1986). "Come to think of it...": Interrogative probes, deceptive communication, and deception detection. Human Communication Research, 12, 339-357.
242. Stiff, J.B., Miller, G.R., Sleight, C., Mongeau, P., Garlick, R., & Rogan, R. (1989). Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 555-564.
243. Stix, G. (2008, August 13). Can fMRI really tell if you are lying? Scientific American. Retrieved September 23, 2010, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id1/4new-lie-detector
244. Strömwall, L.A., & Granhag, P.A. (2005). Children's repeated lies and truths: Effects on adults' judgments and reality monitoring scores. Psychiatry, Psychology, & Law, 12, 345-356.
245. Strömwall, L.A., & Granhag, P.A. (2007). Detecting deceit in pairs of children. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1285-1304.
246. Strömwall, L.A., Granhag, P.A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners' beliefs about deception. In P.A. Granhag, & L.A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229-250). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
247. Strömwall, L.A., Granhag, P.A., & Jonsson, A.C. (2003). Deception among pairs: "Let's say we had lunch together and hope they will swallow it." Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 109-124.
248. Strömwall, L.A, Granhag, P.A., & Landström, S. (2007). Children's prepared and unprepared lies: Can adults see through their strategies? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 457-471.
249. Taylor, R., & Hick, R.F. (2007). Believed cues to deception: Judgments in self-generated serious and trivial situations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 321-332.
250. Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 288-338). New York: Academic Press.
251. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285-293.
252. Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/ avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 208-224.
253. Toris, C., & DePaulo, B.M. (1984). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063-1073.
254. Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm, Sweden: Beckmans.
255. Trovillo, P.V. (1939). A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 29, 848-881.
256. Turner, R.E., Edgley, C., & Olmstead, G. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 69-89.
257. Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen [Evaluation of the credibility of statements]. In U. Undeutsch (Ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie Vol. 11: Forensische Psychologie [Handbook of Psychology Vol. 11: Forensic psychology] (pp. 26-181). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
258. Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27-56). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
259. Undeutsch, U. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51-67.
260. Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101-121). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
261. Van Rossum, W. (1998). Verschijnen voor de rechter: Hoe het hoort en het ritueel van Turkse verdachten in de rechtszaal [Appearing before the court: How to behave and the ritual of Turkish defendants in the courtroom]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij Duizend & Een.
262. Vrij, A. (1993). Credibility judgments of detectives: The impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills and physical characteristics on impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601-611.
263. Vrij, A. (1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117-137.
264. Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 129, 15-29.
265. Vrij, A. (2000). Telling and detecting lies as a function of raising the stakes. In C.M. Breur, M.M. Kommer, J.F. Nijboer, & J.M. Reintjes (Eds.), New trends in criminal investigation and evidence (Vol. 2, pp. 699-709). Antwerpen, Belgium: Intersentia.
266. Vrij, A. (2004). Invited article: Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159-181.
267. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3-41.
268. Vrij, A. (2006). Challenging interviewees during interviews: The potential effects on lie detection. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 193-206.
269. Vrij, A. (2007). Deception: A social lubricant and a selfish act. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 309-342). New York: Psychology Press.
270. Vrij, A. (2008a). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.
271. Vrij, A. (2008b). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1323-1336.
272. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Knight, S. (2006). Police officers', social workers', teachers' and the general public's beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 297-312.
273. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 261-283.
274. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004a). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 8-41.
275. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004b). Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 113-126.
276. Vrij, A., Dragt, A.W., & Koppelaar, L. (1992). Interviews with ethnic interviewees: Nonverbal communication errors in impression formation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 199-209.
277. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 899-909.
278. Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K.P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239-263.
279. Vrij, A., Evans, H., Akehurst, L., & Mann, S. (2004). Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 283-296.
280. Vrij, A., & Fischer, A. (1995). The expression of emotions in simulated rape interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 10, 64-67.
281. Vrij, A., & Fischer, A. (1997). The role of displays of emotions and ethnicity in judgements of rape victims. International Review of Victimology, 4, 255-265.
282. Vrij, A., & Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence, 5, 144-148.
283. Vrij, A., & Granhag, P.A. (2007). Interviewing to detect deception. In S.A. Christianson (Ed.), Offenders' memories of violent crimes (pp. 279-304). Chichester, England: Wiley.
284. Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A., & Mann, S. (in press). Invited article: Good liars. Journal of Psychiatry and Law.
285. Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (in press). Lying about flying: The first experiment to detect false intent. Psychology, Crime & Law.
286. Vrij, A., Harden, F., Terry, J., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). The influence of personal characteristics, stakes and lie complexity on the accuracy and confidence to detect deceit. In R. Roesch, R.R. Corrado, & R.J. Dempster (Eds.), Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge (pp. 289-304). London: Routledge.
287. Vrij, A., Kneller, W., & Mann, S. (2000). The effect of informing liars about criteria-based content analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA-raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 57-70.
288. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P.A., Mann, S., Fisher, R.P., Hillman, J., et al. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159-166.
289. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Granhag, P.A. (in press). A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: Verbal cues and detection accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
290. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Warmelink, L., Granhag, P.A., & Fisher, R.P. (2010). Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 587-594.
291. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187-203.
292. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime & Law, 7, 119-132.
293. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2004). Detecting deception: The benefit of looking at a combination of behavioral, auditory and speech contentrelated cues in a systematic manner. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 61-79.
294. Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2006a). An empirical test of the Behaviour Analysis Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 329-345.
295. Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2006b). Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents' experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 589-599.
296. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253-265.
297. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499-518.
298. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2010). "Look into my eyes": Can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 327-348.
299. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Granhag, P.A. (2010). Getting into the minds of pairs of liars and truth tellers: An examination of their strategies [Special issue]. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 17-22.
300. Vrij, A., & Semin, G.R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 65-80.
301. Vrij, A., & Winkel, F.W. (1991). Cultural patterns in Dutch and Surinam nonverbal behavior: An analysis of simulated police/citizen encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 169-184.
302. Vrij, A., & Winkel, F.W. (1992). Crosscultural police-citizen interactions: The influence of race, beliefs and nonverbal communication on impression formation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1546-1559.
303. Vrij, A., & Winkel, F.W. (1994). Perceptual distortions in crosscultural interrogations: The impact of skin color, accent, speech style and spoken fluency on impression formation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 284-296.
304. Vrij, A., Winkel, F.W., & Koppelaar, L. (1991). Interactie tussen politiefunctionarissen en allochtone burgers: twee studies naar de frequentie en het effect van aan- en wegkijken op de impressieformatie [Cross-cultural police-citizen interactions: Two experiments examining the impact of gaze behavior on impression formation]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 46, 8-20.
305. Waenke, M.,&Bless, H. (2000). The effects of subjective ease of retrieval on attitudinal judgements: The moderating role of processing motivation. In H. Bless, & J.P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behaviour (pp. 143-161). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
306. Walczyk, J.J., Roper, K.S., Seemann, E., & Humphrey, A.M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755-774.
307. Walczyk, J.J., Schwartz, J.P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lying person-to-person about live events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141-170.
308. Wang, G., Chen, H., & Atabakhsh, H. (2004). Criminal identity deception and deception detection in law enforcement. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 111-127.
309. Watanabe, H. (2005). Semantic and episodic predictions of memory for plans. Japanese Psychological Research, 47, 40-45.
310. Wessel, E., Drevland, G., Eilertsen, D.E., & Magnussen, S. (2006). Credibility of the emotional witness: A comparison of ratings by laypersons and court judges. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 221-230.
311. White, C.H., & Burgoon, J.K. (2001). Adaptation and communicative design: Patterns of interaction in truthful and deceptive conversations. Human Communication Research, 27, 9-37.
312. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
313. Winkel, F.W., & Koppelaar, L. (1991). Rape victims' style of selfpresentation and secondary victimization by the environment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 29-40.
314. Winkel, F.W., & Vrij, A. (1990). Interaction and impression formation in a cross-cultural dyad: Frequency and meaning of culturally determined gaze behaviour in a police interview setting. Social Behaviour, 5, 335-350.
315. Wolpe, P.R., Foster, K.R., & Langleben, D.D. (2005). Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 39-49.
316. Yuille, J.C. (1988). The systematic assessment of children's testimony. Canadian Psychology, 29, 247-262.
317. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-57). New York: Academic Press.
318. Zuckerman, M., Driver, R., & Koestner, R. (1982). Discrepancy as a cue to actual and perceived deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 95-100.
319. Zuckerman, M., Speigel, N.H., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Nonverbal strategies for decoding deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 171-187.