Seeing and believing: Visual access and the strategic use of deception

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 258-275

  Schweitzer, Maurice E ^a   Brodt, Susan E ^b   Croson, Rachel T A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038810143     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022876     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anton, R. J. (1990). Drawing the line: An exploratory test of ethical behavior in negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 265-280.
2. Arunachalam, V., & Dilla, W. N. (1995). Judgment accuracy and outcomes in negotiation: A causal modeling analysis of decision-aiding effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 89-304.
3. Barry, B. (1999). The tactical use of emotion in negotiation. In R. Bies, R. Lewicki, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 7. pp. 93-121). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Barsness, Z., & Tenbrunsel, A. (1998, June). Technologically mediated communication and negotiation: Do relationships matter? Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, College Park, MD.
5. Bazerman, M., Curhan, J., Moore, D., & Valley, K. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279-314.
6. Brodt, S., & Dietz, L. (1999). Shared information and information sharing: Understanding negotiation as collective construal. In R. Bies, R. Lewicki, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 7. pp. 263-283). Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
7. Brodt, S., & Tinsley, C. (2000). Diving beneath the surface: Exploring the role of frames, schemas and scripts in understanding conflict resolution across cultures. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Butler, J. K, Jr. (1991).Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643-663.
9. Carnevale, P., & Isen, A. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1-13.
10. Carnevale, P., Pruitt, D., & Seilheimer, S. (1981). Looking and competing: Accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111-120.
11. Chertkoff, J., & Baird, S. (1971). Applicability of the big lie technique and the last clear chance doctrine to bargaining. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 20, 298-303.
12. Croson, T. A. (1999). Look at me when you say that: An electronic negotiation simulation. Simulation and Gaming, 30, 23-37.
13. Croson, R., Boles, T., & Murnighan, J. (in press). Cheap talk in bargaining experiments: Lying and threats in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.
14. DeDreu, C., Giebels, E., & Van de Vliet, E. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 408-422.
15. DeGroot, T., & Motowidlo, S. (1999). Why visual and vocal interview cues can affect interviewers' judgments and predict job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 986-993.
16. DePaulo, P., & DePaulo, B. (1989). Can deception by salespersons and customers be detected through nonverbal behavioral cues? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1552-1577.
17. DePaulo, B., Kashy, D., Kirkendol, S., Wyer, M., & Epstein, J. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
18. DePaulo, B., Lanier, K., & Davis, T. (1983). Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096-1103.
19. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. (1999). A few can catch a liar, Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
20. Ekman P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
21. Fortune, A., & Brodt, S. (2000). Face to face or virtually, for the second time around: The influence of task, past experience, and media on trust and deception in negotiation, Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Graham, J., & Sano, Y. (1984). Smart bargaining: Doing business with the Japanese. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
23. Greenberg. J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288-297.
24. Knapp, M. (1972). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
25. Korsgaard, M. A., Brodt, S., & Whitener, E. (2002). Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 312-319.
26. Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 68-90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Lewis, S., & Fry, W. (1977). Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 20, 75-92.
28. Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
29. O'Connor, K., & Carnevale, P. (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 504-515.
30. Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict. New York: Random House.
31. Purdy, J., Nye, P., & Balakrishnan, P. (2000). The impact of communication media on negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 162-187.
32. Rangaswamy, A., & Shell, G. (1997). Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: Toward an "electronic bargaining table." Management Science, 43, 1147-1163.
33. Schweitzer, M., & Croson, R. (1999). Curtailing deception: The impact of direct questions on lies and omissions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 225-248.
34. Schweitzer, M. (2001). Deception in negotiations. In S. Hoch & H. Kunreuther (Eds), Wharton on making decisions (pp. 187-200). New York: Wiley.
35. Schweitzer, M., Hershey, J., & Bradlow, E. (2003). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust (working paper). Wharton School. University of Pennsylvania.
36. Shapiro, D. (1991). The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 614-630.
37. Shapiro, D., & Bies, R. (1994). Threats, bluffs, and disclaimers in negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 60, 14-35.
38. Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76-105.
39. Thompson, L. (2001). The mind and heart of the negotiator (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Tinsley, C., & Brodt, S. (in press) Conflict management in Asia: A dynamic framework and future directions. In K. Leung & S. White (Eds.), Handbook of Asian management.. New York: Kleuwer Academic Press.
41. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
42. Valley, K., Moag, J., & Bazerman, M. (1998). A matter of trust: Effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of outcomes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 211-238.
43. Valley, K., & Croson, R. (in press). What do communication media mean for negotiations? A question of social awareness. In M. Gelfand & J. Brett (Eds.), Negotiation and culture: Research perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Whitener, E., Brodt, S., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513-530.
45. Weingart, L., Bennett, R., & Brett, J. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.