Deception among pairs: "let's say we had lunch and hope they will swallow it!" Deception among pairs

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 109-124

  Strömwall, Leif A ^a   Granhag, Par Anders ^a   Jonsson, Anna Carin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Deception detection; Diagnostic values of cues to deception; Pairs of suspects; Repeated interrogations

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844468752     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1068316031000116238     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
2. Anderson, C.A., Lepper, M.R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.
3. Buller, D.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-242.
4. DePaulo, B.M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J.J., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1, 346-357.
5. Ekman, P. (1999, November). Personal communication.
6. Gigerenzer, G. (2000, July). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Paper presented at the XXVII International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
7. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2000 a). Effects of preconceptions on deception detection and new answers to why lie-catchers often fail. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 197-218.
8. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2000 b). Deception detection: Examining the consistency heuristic. In C.M. Breur, M.M. Kommer, J.F. Nijboer, and J.M. Reintjes, (Eds.). New trends in criminal investigation and evidence Volume 2 (pp. 309-321). Antwerpen: Intersentia.
9. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (2001), Deception detection based on repeated interrogations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 85-101.
10. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (in press a). Deception detection: Interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied.
11. Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L.A. (in press b). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
12. Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L.A., & Jonsson, A.C. (in press). Partners in crime: How liars in collusion betray themselves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
13. Greuel, L. (1992). Police officers' beliefs about cues associated with deception in rape cases. In F. Lösel, D, Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law - International perspectives (pp. 234-239). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
14. Gudjonsson, G.H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Levine, T.R., Sun Park, H., & McCornack, S.A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the 'Veracity Effect'. Communication Monographs, 66, 125-144.
16. Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Shuy, R.W. (1998). The language of confession, interrogation and deception. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Strömwall, L.A. & Granhag, P.A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 19-36.
19. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. Chichester: John Wiley.
20. Wagenaar, W.A., van Koppen, P.J., & Crombag, H.F.M. (1993). Anchored narratives. The psychology of criminal evidence. New York: St. Martin's Press.
21. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14 (pp.1-59). New York: Academic Press.