Post-probe decision making in a prison context

Communication Monographs

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 269-285

  Bond, Gary D ^a   Malloy, Daniel M ^a   Thompson, Laura A ^a   Arias, Elizabeth A ^a   Nunn, Shannon N ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; Heuristics; Lie biased; Probing effect; Reversed probing effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 11044227161     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0363452042000288328     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
2. Bond, G. D., & Lee, A. Y. (in press). The darkest side of trust: validating the generalized communication suspicion scale with prison inmates. Personality and Individual Differences.
3. Bond, G. D., & Lee, A. Y. (2004). Language of lies in prison: Semantic classification of prisoners' truthful and deceptive language. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Bond, G. D., Malloy, D. M., Arias, E. A., Nunn, S. N., & Thompson, L. A. (in press). Lie-biased decision making in prison. Communication Reports.
5. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., White, C. H., & Ebesu, A. S. (1994). Interpersonal deception: VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, concealment, and equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 366-395.
6. Buller, D. B., Stiff, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Behavioral adaptation in deceptive transactions: Fact or fiction: Reply to Levine and McCornack. Human Communication Research, 22(4), 589-603.
7. Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Comstock, J. (1991a). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceiver's reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58(1), 1-24.
8. Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Hunsaker, F. G. (1991b). Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25-40.
9. Burgoon, J. K., le Poire, B. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(4), 287-321.
10. CBS News (Producer). (1997). Stalkers: Against the Law [videorecording]. (Available from CBS News)
11. Cosgrove, J., & Meurer, T. D. (Producers). (1992). Criminal profilers [videorecording]. High Road Films. (Available from The Learning Channel)
12. Garrido, E., & Masip, J. (2001). Previous exposure to the sender's behavior and accuracy at judging credibility. In R. Roesch, R. R. Corrado, & R. Dempster (Eds.), Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge (pp. 271-287). London: Routledge.
13. Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2001). Deception detection: Interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements. Journal of Psychology, 135(6), 603-620.
14. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Hubbell, A. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Gee, J. C. (2001). The relative effects of timing of suspicion and outcome involvement on biased message processing. Communication Monographs, 68(2), 115-132.
16. Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1991). The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 4, 325-340.
17. Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1992). Linking love and lies: A formal test of the McCornack and Parks model of deception detection. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 143-154.
18. Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (2001). Behavioral adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 27(4), 471-502.
19. Levine, T. R., Park, H. S., & McCornack, S. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: documenting the "veracity effect." Communication Monographs, 66(2), 125-144.
20. McCornack, S. A., & Levine, T. R. (1990). When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 57(3), 219-230.
21. McCornack, S. A., Levine, T. R., Aleman, C. G., Oetzel, J. G., & Miller, L. L. (1991, May). When asking questions answers them: The effects of a probing heuristic upon judgments of honesty. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
22. Neuman, Y., Bekerman, Z., & Kaplan, A. (2002). Rhetoric as the contextual manipulation of self and nonself. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(1), 93-112.
23. Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443-452.
24. Stiff, J. B., Miller, G. R., Sleight, C., Mongeau, P., Garlick, R., & Rogan, R. (1989). Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 555-564.
25. Toris, C., & DePaulo, B. M. (1985). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1063-1073.
26. Trafimow, D., Silverman, E. S., Mei-Tai Fan, R., & Shui Fun Law, J. (1997). The effects of language and priming on the relative accessibility of the private and the collective self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 107-123.
27. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (Ed.). (2002). National Corrections Reporting Program conducted by U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census [computer file], Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
28. Vrij, A., & Baxter, M. (1999). Accuracy and confidence in detecting truth and lies in elaborations and denials: Truth-bias, lie-bias and individual differences. Expert Evidence, 7(1), 25-36.
29. Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(1), 65-80.