Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 283-296

  Vrij, Aldert ^a   Evans, Hayley ^a   Akehurst, Lucy ^a   Mann, Samantha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 4444297152     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.964     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and reality monitoring: a new answer to an old question? In R Lösel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 328-332). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
2. Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1996). Detecting fact from fallacy in child and adult witness accounts. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law, and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 74-80). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
3. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
4. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
5. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. R. (1976). Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction. Semiotica, 16, 23-27.
6. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125-135.
7. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
8. Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1429-1439.
9. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality Monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
10. Köhnken, G., & Steller, M. (1988). The evaluation of the credibility of child witness statements in German procedural system. In G. Davies, & J. Drinkwater (Eds.), The child witness: Do the courts abuse children? (Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, no. 13) (pp. 37-45). Leicester, United Kingdom: British Psychological Society.
11. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Nisbett, R. E., Borgida, E., Crandall, R., & Reed, H. (1976). Popular induction: information is not always informative. In J. S. Carroll, & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior, Vol. 2 (pp. 227-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: an investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643-658.
14. Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Assessment of children's statements of sexual abuse. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 153-165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.
16. Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.). Credibility Assessment (pp. 135-154). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York, NJ: Springer-Verlag.
18. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
19. Vrij, A. (2001). Implicit lie detection. The Psychologist, 14, 58-60.
20. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2003). Telling and detecting true lies: Investigating and detecting the lies of murderers and thieves during police interviews. In M. Verhallen, G. Verhaeke, P. J. van Koppen, & J. Goethals (Eds.), Much ado about crime: Chapters on psychology and law (pp. 185-208). Brussel: Politeia.
21. Vrij, A., Semin, G. R., & Bull, R. (1996). Insight into behaviour during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544-562.
22. Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239-263.
23. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001a). People's insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 373-389.
24. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001b). Police officers' ability to detect deceit: the benefit of indirect deception detection measures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 185-197.
25. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001c). Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 899-909.
26. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (in press). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research.