Situational determinants of the acceptability of telling lies

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1048-1062

  Backbier, Esther H F ^a   Hoogstraten, Johan ^a   Meerum Terwogt Kouwenhoven, Katharina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031574921     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00286.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Backbier, E. H. F. (1994). Liegen in dagelighse situaties: Groepsinterviews [Lying in everyday situations: Group interviews]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
4. Barnes, J. A. (1994). A pack of lies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285-301.
6. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
7. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 191-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Coleman, L., & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language, 57, 26-44.
9. DePaulo, B. M., Epstein, J. A., & Wyer, M. M. (1993). Sex differences in lying: How women and men deal with the dilemma of deceit. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 126-147). New York, NY: Guilford.
10. DeVries, D. L., & Ajzen, I. (1971). The relationship of attitudes and normative beliefs to cheating in college. The Journal of Social Psychology, 83, 199-207.
11. Enker, M. S. (1987). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of cheating behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 315-330.
12. Keating, C. F., & Heltman, K. R. (1994). Dominance and deception in children and adults: Are leaders the best misleaders? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 312-321.
13. Lindskold, S., & Han, G. (1986). Intent and the judgment of lies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 129-130.
14. Lindskold, S., & Walters, P. S. (1983). Categories for the acceptability of lies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 129-136.
15. Maier, R. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (1976). Lying behavior and the evaluation of lies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 575-581.
16. Meerum Terwogt-Kouwenhoven, K. (1992). Over misleiding [On deception]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 47, 205-222.
17. Metts, S. (1989). An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 159-179.
18. Millar, K. U., & Tesser, A. (1988). Deceptive behavior in social relationships: A consequence of violated expectations. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 263-273.
19. Miller, G. R., & Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Pope, W. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1986). Judgments of deceptive communications: A multidimensional analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 435-436.
21. Suls, J., & Wan, C. K. (1987). In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: Fear and estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 211-217.
22. Van den Brink, W. P., & Koele, P. (1987). Statistiek. Deel 3: Toepassingen [Statistics. Part 3: Applications]. Meppel, The Netherlands: Boom.