Believed cues to deception: Judgments in self-generated trivial and serious situations

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 321-331

  Taylor, Rachel ^a   Hick, Rachel F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVOUSNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STEREOTYPY;

EID: 34548829654     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/135532506X116101     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461-471.
2. Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J., & Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom? Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 23, 67-89.
3. Burgoon, J. K., Kelley, D. L., Newton, D. A., & Keeley-Dyreson, M. P. (1989). The nature of arousal and non-verbal indices. Human Communication Research, 16, 217-255.
4. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Review, 129, 74-118.
5. Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: Norton.
6. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
7. Fiedler, K., & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use non-verbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.
8. Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1429-1439.
9. Granhag, P. A., Andersson, L. O., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals' beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103-119.
10. Granhag, P. A., Hartwig, M., & Strömwall, L. A. (2005). Granting asylum or not? Migration board personnel's beliefs about deception. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 29-50.
11. Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? Social Behaviour, 2, 1-17.
12. Lakhani, M., & Taylor, R. (2003). Beliefs about the cues to deception in high and low stake situations. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 357-368.
13. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 365-376.
14. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137-149.
15. O'Sullivan, M. (2003). The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: The boy-who-cried-wolf effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1316-1327.
16. Porter, S., Campbell, M. A., Stapleton, J., & Birt, A. R. (2002). The influence of judge, target and stimulus characteristics on the accuracy of detecting deceit. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 172-185.
17. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth lies and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behaviour, 24, 643-658.
18. Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 19-36.
19. Taylor, R., & Vrij, A. (2000). The effects of varying stake and cognitive complexity on beliefs about the cues to deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 3, 111-123.
20. Vrij, A. (1993). Credibility judgments of detectives: The impact of non-verbal behaviour, social skills and physical characteristics on impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601-610.
21. Vrij, A. (1995). Behavioural correlates of deception in a simulated police interview. Journal of Psychology, 129, 15-28.
22. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. Chichester: Wiley.
23. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). People's insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 373-389.
24. Vrij, A., & Heaven, S. (1999). Vocal and verbal indicators as a function of lie complexity. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 203-215.
25. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Lying when the stakes are high: Deceptive behaviour of a murderer during his police interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187-203.
26. Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts' beliefs about non-verbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 20, 65-80.
27. Vrij, A., & Taylor, R. (2003). Police officers' and students beliefs about telling and detecting trivial and serious lies. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 5, 41-49.
28. Vrij, A., & Winkel, F. W. (1993). Objective and subjective indicators of deception. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 20, 51-57.
29. Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lying person-to-person about life events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 59, 141-170.
30. Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Driver, R. E. (1981). Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 6, 105-114.