Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 587-594

  Vrij, Aldert ^a   Leal, Sharon ^a   Mann, Samantha ^a   Warmelink, Lara ^a   Granhag, Par Anders ^b   Fisher, Ronald P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DRAWING; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERBALIZATION;

EID: 79952098698     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1627     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Akehurst, L., & Vrij, A. (1999). Creating suspects in police interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 192-210.
2. Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
3. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
4. Elaad, E., Ginton, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1994). The effects of prior expectations and outcome knowledge on polygraph examiners' decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 279-292.
5. Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 189-200.
6. Köhnken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. In G. R. Semin, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 257-282). London, UK: Sage Publications.
7. Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the 'detection of the truth'. In P. A. Granhag, & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 41-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Masip, J., Sporer, S., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 11, 99-122.
9. Raskin, D. C.,&Honts, C. R. (2002). The comparison question test. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 1-47). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Rosenfeld, J. P. (2002). Event-related potential in the detection of deception, malingering, and false memories. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 265-286). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Spence, S. A., Farrow, T. F. D., Herford, A. E., Wilkinson, I. D., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P. W. R. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 2849-2853.
12. Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421-446.
13. Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A metaanalytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1-34.
14. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3-41.
15. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
16. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fisher, R. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499-518.
17. Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., et al. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159-166.