On lie detection "wizards"

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 109-115

  Bond Jr , Charles F ^a   Uysal, Ahmet ^b  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Deception detection

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CRIME; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; PROBABILITY; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DECEPTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

EID: 33847257943     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9016-1     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (in press). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
2. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991).Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
3. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
4. Etcoff, N., Ekman, P., Magee, J. J., & Frank, M. G. (2000). Lie detection and language comprehension. Nature, 405, 139.
5. Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deception generalizes across different types of high-stakes lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1429-1439.
6. Frank, M. G., Paolantonio, N., Feeley, T. H., & Servoss, T. J. (2004). Individual and small group accuracy in judging truthful and deceptive communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 45-59.
7. Garrido, E., Masip, J., & Herrero, C. (2002). Police officers' credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 276-289.
8. Granhag, P. A., & Stromwall, L. A. (2004). Deception detection in forensic contexts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
10. Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). "I'm innocent!": Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
11. Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). "He's guilty:" Investigator bias and judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469-480.
12. Nickerson, C. A. E., & Hammond, K. R. (1993). Comment on Ekman and O'Sullivan. American Psychologist, 48, 989.
13. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
14. O'Sullivan, M. (2003). The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: The boy-who-cried-wolf effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1316-1327.
15. O'Sullivan,M. (2005). Emotional intelligence and deception detection: Whymost people can't 'read' others, but a few can. In R. E. Riggio & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Applications of nonverbal communication (pp. 215-253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. O'Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Stromwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 269-286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Press.
17. O'Sullivan, M., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.
18. Rosenthal, R. (1994). On being one's own case study: Experimenter effects in behavioral research - 30 years later. In W. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds.), The social psychology of science (pp. 214-229). New York: Guilford Press.
19. Vrij, A. (2001). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. New York: Wiley.