Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: A critical review

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 101-110

  MacPherson, Gavin J ^a   Breusch, Steffen J ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hip resurfacing; Metal on metal; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; METAL ION;

AGE; ARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INFECTION COMPLICATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METAL IMPLANTATION; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS MALPOSITIONING; REOPERATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; HUMANS; METALS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 78751579211     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. HW Amarasekera ML Costa P Foguet SJ Krikler U Prakash DR Griffin 2008 The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparison of two approaches using laser doppler flowmetry J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 4 442 445 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3hvFOksQ%3D%3D 18378916 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4. 20050
2. HC Amstutz PA Campbell MJ Le Duff 2004 Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 1874 1877 15342747
3. HC Amstutz MJ Le Duff 2006 Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220 85 94 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283ksFKlsA%3D%3D 16669378
4. HC Amstutz MJ Le Duff 2008 Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus J Arthroplasty 23 6 Suppl 1 36 43 18639431 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017
5. HC Amstutz MJ Le Duff N Harvey M Hoberg 2008 Improved survivorship of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with second-generation techniques for Crowe-I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 12 20 18676931 10.2106/JBJS.H.00711
6. Amstutz HC, Wisk LE, Le Duff MJ (2010) Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.033
7. J Antoniou DJ Zukor F Mwale W Minarik A Petit OL Huk 2008 Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prostheses J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 142 148 18676949 10.2106/JBJS.H.00442
8. DL Back R Dalziel D Young A Shimmin 2005 Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 3 324 329 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ktFOksQ%3D%3D 15773639 10.1302/0301-620X.87B3.15556
9. ST Ball MJ Le Duff HC Amstutz 2007 Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 735 741 17403794 10.2106/JBJS.F.00708
10. PE Beaule FJ Dorey M Le Duff T Gruen HC Amstutz 2004 Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip Clin Orthop Relat Res 418 87 93 15043098 10.1097/00003086-200401000-00015
11. PE Beaulé JL Lee MJ Le Duff HC Amstutz E Ebramzadeh 2004 Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 2015 2021 15342765
12. J Beckmann C Goldapp K Ringleff J Schaumburger J Grifka L Perlick 2009 Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129 10 1317 1325 18802712 10.1007/s00402-008-0753-0
13. BC Bengs SN Sangiorgio E Ebramzadeh 2008 Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs Acta Orthop 79 6 755 762 19085491 10.1080/17453670810016812
14. RG Bitsch T Loidolt C Heisel TP Schmalzried 2008 Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development of a laboratory model J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 102 110 18676944 10.2106/JBJS.H.00622
15. Bitsch RG, Loidolt T, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP (2010) Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: in vitro study of pressure and temperature hip resurfacing: pressure and temperature. J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.10.011
16. ML Buergi WL Walter 2007 Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience J Arthroplasty 22 7 Suppl 3 61 65 17919596 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.021
17. P Campbell PE Beaulé E Ebramzadeh M Le Duff K De Smet Z Lu HC Amstutz 2006 A study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 35 46 16906115 10.1097/01.blo.0000238777.34939.82
18. I Catelas PA Campbell JD Bobyn JB Medley OL Huk 2006 Wear particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements: effects of implant design and implantation time Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220 195 208 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD28Xksl2gsL8%3D 16669387
19. K Corten SJ MacDonald 2010 Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries. What do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 351 357 20012720 10.1007/s11999-009-1157-3
20. AJ Cossey DL Back A Shimmin D Young AJ Spriggins 2005 The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure J Arthroplasty 20 3 358 361 15809955 10.1016/j.arth.2004. 08.007
21. JR Crawford SJ Palmer JA Wimhurst RN Villar 2005 Bone loss at hip resurfacing: a comparison with total hip arthroplasty Hip Int 15 195 198
22. J Daniel PB Pynsent DJW McMinn 2004 Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 177 184 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ltlaisg%3D%3D 15046429 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2. 14600
23. J Daniel H Ziaee C Pradhan DJ McMinn 2009 Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 2 176 179 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7hslGntQ%3D%3D 19190049 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21654
24. AP Davies HG Willert PA Campbell ID Learmonth CP Case 2005 An unusual lymphocyte perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 18 27 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FgvVymuw%3D%3D 15634811 10.2106/JBJS.C.00949
25. ET Davis P Gallie K Macgroarty JP Waddell E Schemitsch 2007 The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: a cadaver study J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 557 560 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srjvFCgtg%3D%3D 17463131 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.17893
26. ET Davis M Olsen R Zdero JP Waddell EH Schemitsch 2008 Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 11 1522 1527 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjhtFKhug%3D%3D 18978277 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20068
27. R De Haan C Pattyn HS Gill DW Murray PA Campbell K De Smet 2008 Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 10 1291 1297 18827237 10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.20533
28. CJ Della Valle RM Nunley SJ Raterman RL Barrack 2009 Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 1 72 78 18949528 10.1007/s11999-008-0563-2
29. KA De Smet 2005 Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty Orthop Clin North Am 36 203 213 15833458 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.01.004
30. K De Smet PA Campbell HS Gill 2010 Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: A consensus from the advanced hip resurfacing course, Ghent, June 2009 J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 3 335 336 20190301 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23946
31. K De Smet R De Haan A Calistri PA Campbell E Ebramzadeh C Pattyn HS Gill 2008 Metal ion measurements as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 4 202 208 18984732 10.2106/JBJS.H.00672
32. E Dunstan D Ladon P Whittingham-Jones R Carrington TW Briggs 2008 Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 3 517 522 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7ltlOksw%3D%3D 18310701 10.2106/JBJS.F.01435
33. VK Eswaramoorthy LC Biant RE Field 2009 Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 11 1454 1458 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MjjtFaisg%3D%3D 19880889 10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22651
34. Fisher NE, Killampalli VV, Kundra RK, Jagodzinski NA, Mathur K, Reading AD (2010) Sporting and physical activity following hip resurfacing. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1053-1
35. M Ganapathi PA Vendittoli M Lavigne KP Günther 2009 Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 5 1341 1347 18484146 10.1007/s11999-008-0299-z
36. DS Garbuz M Tanzer NV Greidanus BA Masri CP Duncan 2010 The John Charnley Award: metal-on-metal resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 2 318 325 19697090 10.1007/s11999-009-1029-x
37. HS Gill PA Campbell DW Murray KA De Smet 2007 Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 1 16 20 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FlsFSktw%3D%3D 17259409 10.2106/JBJS.F.00941
38. S Glyn-Jones H Pandit YM Kwon H Doll HS Gill DW Murray 2009 Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 12 1566 1574 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mjpt1Cgsg%3D%3D 19949118 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22287
39. G Grammatopolous H Pandit YM Kwon R Gundle P McLardy-Smith DJ Beard DW Murray HS Gill 2009 Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 8 1019 1102 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1Mrjt1eitQ%3D%3D 19651827 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22562
40. A Grübl M Marker W Brodner A Giurea G Heinze V Meisinger H Zehetgruber R Kotz 2007 Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement J Orthop Res 25 7 841 848 17405158 10.1002/jor.20381 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXotFantbw%3D
41. D Hall D Srikantharajah R Anakwe P Gaston C Howie 2009 Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacement Hip Int 19 2 245 250
42. AJ Hart P Buddhdev P Winship N Faria JJ Powell JA Skinner 2008 Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing Hip Int 18 3 212 219 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnmtlCitw%3D%3D 18924077
43. AJ Hart S Sabah J Henckel A Lewis J Cobb B Sampson A Mitchell JA Skinner 2009 The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 6 738 744 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzoslOnsQ%3D%3D 19483225 10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21682
44. GN Heilpern NN Shah MJ Fordyce 2008 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 9 1137 1142 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crntFOltg%3D%3D 18757951 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20524
45. CB Hing DA Young RE Dalziel M Bailey DL Back AJ Shimmin 2007 Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 1019 1024 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srhvFCqsg%3D%3D 17785738
46. DS Hungerford 2005 Metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty: no way under the sun!-in the affirmative J Arthroplasty 20 4 Suppl 2 68 69 15991134 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.023
47. CI Hur TR Yoon SG Cho EK Song JK Seon 2008 Serum ion level after metal-on-metal THA in patients with renal failure Clin Orthop Relat Res 466 3 696 699 18264859 10.1007/s11999-007-0093-3
48. MA Jacobs RN Goytia T Bhargava 2008 Hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach. Surgical description and early review J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 38 44 18676935 10.2106/JBJS.H.00684
49. S Jameson D Langton S Natu TVF Nargol 2008 The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing, an independent center analysis J Arthroplasty 23 6 50 55 18555643 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.019
50. Joyce TJ, Langton DJ, Lord J, Grigg H, Jameson SS, Cooke N, Tulloch C, Logishetty R, Meek D, Nargol AVF (2010) Explant analysis of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip components retrieved following adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010
51. GM Keegan ID Learmonth CP Case 2007 Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patient: a review of current knowledge and future strategies J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 567 573 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2szivVWgsA%3D%3D 17540737 10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18903
52. M Khan JH Kuiper D Edwards E Robinson JB Richardson 2009 Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results J Arthroplasty 24 7 1044 1050 18834698 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.016
53. M Khan J-H Kuiper JB Richardson 2008 The exercise-related rise in plasma cobalt levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 9 1152 1157 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crntFOltA%3D%3D 18757953 10.2106/JBJS.G.00633
54. A Khan P Yates A Lovering GC Bannister RF Spencer 2007 The effect of surgical approach on blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 21 25 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FlsFSktA%3D%3D 17259410 10.2106/JBJS.F.00464
55. D Kluess C Zietz T Lindner W Mittelmeier K-P Schmitz R Bader 2008 Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter Acta Orthop 79 6 748 754 19085490 10.1080/17453670810016803
56. YM Kwon S Glyn-Jones DJ Simpson A Kamali P McLardy-Smith HS Gill DW Murray 2010 Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 3 356 361 20190305 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23281
57. D Ladon A Doherty R Newson J Turner M Bhamra CP Case 2004 Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 19 8 Suppl 3 78 83 15578558 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.010
58. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Nargol AVF (2010) Asymptomatic patients with increased blood metal ion levels following metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Is failure imminent? In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010
59. DJ Langton SS Jameson TJ Joyce NJ Hallab S Natu AVF Nargol 2010 Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 1 38 46 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c%2Fgt1Grtg%3D%3D 20044676 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22770
60. DJ Langton AP Sprowson TJ Joyce M Reed I Carluke P Partington AV Nargol 2009 Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 10 1287 1295 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnlvFOgug%3D%3D 19794161 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22308
61. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Van Oursouw M, De Smet K, Nargol AVF (2010) Suggested safe zone for cup placement for the reduction of blood metal ion concentrations following hip resurfacing. British Hip Society Annual Scientific Meeting. 25 February 2010
62. M Lavigne J Parvizi M Beck KA Siebenrock R Ganz M Leunig 2004 Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery Clin Orthop Relat Res 418 61 66 15043094 10.1097/00003086-200401000-00011
63. EA Lingard K Muthumayandi JP Holland 2009 Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 12 1550 1554 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mjpt1ChtQ%3D%3D 19949115 10.1302/0301-620X. 91B12.22326
64. JP Little HA Gray DW Murray DJ Beard HS Gill 2008 Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing J Arthroplasty 23 3 454 458 18358388 10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.015
65. CP Little AL Ruiz IJ Harding P McLardy-Smith R Gundle DW Murray NA Athanasou 2005 Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 3 320 323 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2M7ktFOksA%3D%3D 15773638 10.1302/0301-620X.87B3.15330
66. JP Long DL Bartel 2006 Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 115 122 17016222 10.1097/01.blo.0000238873.09390.6f
67. SJ MacDonald 2004 Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 86 93 15577471 10.1097/01.blo.0000150309.48474.8b
68. G Mahendra H Pandit K Kliskey D Murray HS Gill N Athanasou 2009 Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties Acta Orthop 80 6 653 659 19995315 10.3109/17453670903473016
69. A Malviya JP Holland 2009 Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 10-year Newcastle experience Acta Orthop Belg 75 4 477 483 19774814
70. DR Marker TM Seyler RH Jinnah RE Delanois SD Ulrich MA Mont 2007 Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study J Arthroplasty 22 7 Suppl 3 66 71 17919597 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.017
71. CW Mcbryde K Theivendran AM Thomas RBC Treacy PB Pynsent 2010 The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of birmingham hip resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 1 105 112 20048102 10.2106/JBJS.I.00197
72. MS McGrath DR Desser SD Ulrich TM Seyler DR Marker MA Mont 2008 Total hip resurfacing in patients who are sixty years of age or older J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 27 31 18676933 10.2106/JBJS.H.00464
73. DJW McMinn J Daniel H Ziaee C Pradhan 2008 Results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow up J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 715 723 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1czntFKhsg%3D%3D 18539663 10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.19875
74. MHRA (2010) Medical Device Alert Ref: MDA/2010/044. http://www.mhra.gov. uk/. Accessed on 5th July 2010
75. MHRA (2010) Medical Device Alert Ref: MDA/2010/033. http://www.mhra.gov. uk/. Accessed on 5th July 2010
76. MA Mont DR Marker JM Smith SD Ulrich MS McGrath 2009 Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 1 66 71 18841436 10.1007/s11999-008-0465-3
77. MA Mont MS McGrath SD Ulrich TM Seyler DR Marker RE Delanois 2008 Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 45 51 18676936 10.2106/JBJS.H.00436
78. MM Morlock N Bishop J Zustin M Hahn W Rüther M Amling 2008 Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 89 95 18676942 10.2106/JBJS.H.00621
79. MM Morlock N Bishop W Rüther G Delling M Hahn 2006 Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220 2 333 344 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283ksFKrsQ%3D%3D 16669399 10.1243/095441105X69015
80. GJ Myers D Morgan CW McBryde K O'Dwyer 2009 Does surgical approach influence component positioning with Birmingham hip resurfacing? Int Orthop 33 1 59 63 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7gs1elsg%3D%3D 17968547 10.1007/s00264-007-0469-8
81. National Joint Replacement Registry, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Annual Report 2008. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/. Accessed on 5th July 2010
82. National Joint Replacement Registry, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Annual Report 2009: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp? section=reports2009
83. National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2010) Sixth Annual Report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/. Accessed on 5th July 2010
84. T Nishii N Sugano H Miki M Takao T Koyama H Yoshikawa 2007 Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients J Arthroplasty 22 2 176 183 17275630 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.008
85. SE Nork M Schär G Pfander M Beck V Djonov R Ganz M Leunig 2005 Anatomic considerations for the choice of surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty Orthop Clin North Am 36 2 163 170 15833453 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.01. 003
86. RM Nunley CJ Della Valle RL Barrack 2009 Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 1 56 65 18941859 10.1007/s11999-008-0558-z
87. B Ollivere C Darrah T Barker J Nolan MJ Porteous 2009 Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 8 1025 1030 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mrjt1eiug%3D%3D 19651828 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.21701
88. B Ollivere S Duckett A August M Porteous 2010 The Birmingham hip resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a district general hospital Int Orthop 34 5 631 634 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3czkvVCluw%3D%3D 19506866 10.1007/s00264-009-0821-2
89. H Pandit S Glyn-Jones P McLardy-Smith R Gundle D Whitwell CL Gibbons S Ostlere N Athanasou HS Gill DW Murray 2008 Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 7 847 851 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvit1WgsQ%3D%3D 18591590 10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20213
90. AV Papavasiliou RN Villar 2008 Quality of life in different age groups after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty Hip Int 18 4 307 312 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FpvFKktg%3D%3D 19097009
91. S Patntirapong P Habibovic PV Hauschka 2009 Effects of soluble cobalt and cobalt incorporated into calcium phosphate layers on osteoclast differentiation and activation Biomaterials 30 4 548 555 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVensr7N 18996589 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.062
92. TC Pollard RP Baker SJ Eastaugh-Waring GC Bannister 2006 Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 5 592 600 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283jslChsA%3D%3D 16645103 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17354
93. GH Prosser PJ Yates DJ Wood SE Graves RN de Steiger LN Miller 2010 Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision Acta Orthop 81 1 66 71 20180719 10.3109/17453671003685434
94. MP Revell CW McBryde S Bhatnagar PB Pynsent RB Treacy 2006 Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 Suppl 3 98 103 17079374 10.2106/JBJS.F.01070
95. CJ Richards D Giannitsios OL Huk DJ Zukor T Steffen J Antoniou 2008 Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 96 101 18676943 10.2106/JBJS.H.00444
96. Ring PA (1989) Press-fit prosthesis clinical experience. In: Freeman MAR, Reynolds DA (eds) Osteoarthritis and the young adult hip. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 220-232
97. JR Romanowski ML Swank 2008 Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 65 70 18676939 10.2106/JBJS.H.00462
98. TP Schmalzried EF Shepherd FJ Dorey WO Jackson M dela Rosa F Fa'vae HA McKellop CD McClung J Martell JR Moreland HC Amstutz 2000 The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time Clin Orthop Relat Res 381 36 46 11127668 10.1097/00003086-200012000-00005
99. TM Seyler LP Lai DI Sprinkle WG Ward RH Jinnah 2008 Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 71 80 18676940 10.2106/JBJS.H.00697
100. Shears E, McBryde CW, Pynsnet PB (2010) Outcome of revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010
101. AJ Shimmin D Back 2005 Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 463 464 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7mt12ltA%3D%3D 15795193 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15498
102. A Shimmin PE Beaulé P Campbell 2008 Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 3 637 654 18310716 10.2106/JBJS.G.01012
103. AJ Shimmin WL Walter C Esposito 2010 The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 4 469 476 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c3ivVCjtg%3D%3D 20357319 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22967
104. S Spencer R Carter H Murray R Meek 2008 Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing J Arthroplasty 23 8 1105 1109 18534469 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.014
105. RT Steffen NA Athanasou HS Gill DW Murray 2010 Avascular necrosis associated with fracture of the femoral neck after hip resurfacing: histological assessment of femoral bone from retrieval specimens J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 6 787 793 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cznsVyqsA%3D%3D 20513874 10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.23377
106. RT Steffen PR Foguet SJ Krikler R Gundle DJ Beard DW Murray 2009 Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing J Arthroplasty 24 4 614 619 18555654 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.008
107. RT Steffen K O'Rourke HS Gill DW Murray 2007 The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 1293 1298 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snjt1Ohtg%3D%3D 17957066
108. RT Steffen HP Pandit J Palan DJ Beard R Gundle P McLardy-Smith DW Murray HS Gill 2008 The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 4 436 441 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3hvFOksA%3D%3D 18378915 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648
109. Stulberg BN, Fitts SM, Bowen AR, Zadilka JD (2009) Early return to function after hip resurfacing is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.034
110. BN Stulberg KK Trier M Naughton JD Zadzilka 2008 Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 3 21 26 18676932 10.2106/JBJS.H.00718
111. AP Toms TJ Marshall J Cahir C Darrah J Nolan ST Donell T Barker JK Tucker 2008 MRI of early symptomatic metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of radiological findings in 20 hips Clin Radiol 63 1 49 58 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjjt1arsQ%3D%3D 18068790 10.1016/j.crad.2007.07.012
112. RBC Treacy CW McBryde PB Pynsent 2005 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow up of five years J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 167 170 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7gs1elsg%3D%3D 15736736 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15030
113. Underwood RJ, Cann PM, Ilo K, Wagner CR, Skinner J, Cobb J, Porter M, Muirhead-Allwood S, Hart A (2010) What is the incidence and common characteristics of high wearing explanted metal-on-metal hips. In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010
114. TP Vail RR Glisson DE Dominguez K Kitaoka D Ottaviano 2008 Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 9 1951 1960 18762656 10.2106/JBJS.F.00788
115. PA Vendittoli M Lavigne J Girard AG Roy 2006 A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 997 1002 16877595 10.2106/JBJS.E.00173
116. TI Visuri E Pukkala P Pulkkinen P Paavolainen 2006 Cancer incidence and causes of death among total hip replacement patients: a review based on Nordic cohorts with a special emphasis on metal-on-metal bearings Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220 2 399 407 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xksl2gsLc%3D 16669405 10.1243/095441105X63282
117. TS Wik PO Østbyhaug J Klaksvik A Aamodt 2010 Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 3 461 467 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c7ksVejtg%3D%3D 20190322 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22592
118. D Williams M Royle M Norton 2009 Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement J Arthroplasty 24 1 144 1451 18823742 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.021
119. S Witjes JM Smolders PE Beaulé P Pasker JL Van Susante 2009 Learning from the learning curve in total hip resurfacing: a radiographic analysis Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129 10 1293 1299 19381662 10.1007/s00402-009- 0875-z
120. WC Witzleb U Hanisch J Ziegler KP Guenther 2009 In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of 10 retrieved components J Arthroplasty 24 6 951 956 18757168 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.022
121. Wynn Jones H, Wimhurst J, Macnair R, Derbishire B, Chirodian N, Toms A, Cahir J (2010) High early failure rate with large head metal-on-metal hip replacement: The importance of MRI imaging. In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010
122. WD Xu J Li ZH Zhou YS Wu M Li 2008 Results of hip resurfacing for developmental dysplasia of the hip of Crowe type I and II Chin Med J 121 15 1379 1383 18959113
123. H Ziaee J Daniel AK Datta S Blunt DJ McMinn 2007 Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a controlled study J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 301 305 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2s7ls1WmsQ%3D%3D 17356138
124. J Zustin M Krause S Breer M Hahn C von Domarus W Rüther G Sauter MM Morlock M Amling 2010 Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 92 2 404 410 20124068 10.2106/JBJS.H.01113