Early Return to Function After Hip Resurfacing. Is It Better Than Contemporary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 748-753

  Stulberg, Bernard N ^a   Fitts, Stephanie M ^b   Bowen, Ashlea R ^c   Zadzilka, Jayson D ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS   (United States)

^c Corin USA ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramic on ceramic; Function; Resurfacing; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP RESURFACING; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; FOLLOW UP; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HOSPITALIZATION; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

VITALLIUM;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CERAMICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VITALLIUM;

EID: 77954659536     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.034     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. D'Antonio J.A., Capello W.N., Bierbaum B., et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty: 5-9 year follow-up. Semin Arthro 2006, 17:146.
2. Stulberg B.N., Trier K.K., Naughton M., et al. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):21.
3. Graves S, Davidson D, Ingerson L, et al. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2005, AOA, Adelaide, [website]. http://www.aoa.org.au/docs/njrrrep06.pdf.
4. Amstutz H.C., Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 2004, 86-A:28.
5. Lilikakis A.K., Vowler S.L., Villar R.N. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36:215.
6. Pattyn C., De Smet K. Primary ceramic-on-ceramic THR versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in active young patients 2005.
7. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., et al. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007, 22:100.
8. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 1969, 51-A:737.
9. Amstutz H.C., Thomas B.J., Jinnah R., et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1984, 66-A:228.
10. Pollard T.C.B., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five-to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg 2006, 88-B:592.
11. Vail T.P., Mina C.A., Yergler J.D., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 453:123.
12. Shimmin A.J., Bennell K., et al. Gait analysis comparison of the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement 2008.
13. Lavigne M., Masse V., Roy A., Vendittoli P.A. Return to sports after hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial 2008.