The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: An independent series

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 436-441

  Steffen, R T ^a,b   Pandit, H P ^a,b   Palan, J ^a,b   Beard, D J ^a,b   Gundle, R ^a,b   McLardy Smith, P ^a,b   Murray, D W ^a,b   Gill, H S ^a,b  

^a NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SURVIVAL TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 42149097828     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/Public/prev_annual_reports.htm (date last accessed 17 February 2008).
2. Graves SE, Davidson D, Ingerson L, et al. The Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Aust 2004;180(Suppl):31-4.
3. No authors listed. Smith and Nephew. http://www.hipresurfacing. com/patients.asp (date last accessed 17 February 2008).
4. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84.
5. McMinn D, Treacy B, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1996;329(Suppl):89-98.
6. McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Pynsent PB, Pradhan C. Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach. Clin Orthop 2005;441:91-8.
7. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
8. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years: an independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1431-8.
9. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:592-600.
10. Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, et al. Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:176-83.
11. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-9.
12. DeSmet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonck R. Early results of a primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int 2002;12:158-62.
13. Pollard TCB, Basu C, Ainsworth R, Lai W, Bannister GC. Is the Birmingham hip resurfacing worthwhile? Hip Int 2003;13:25-8.
14. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:185-90.
15. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:890-5.
16. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
17. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973;55-A:1629-32.
18. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-55.
19. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75-B:697-704.
20. White SH. The fate of cemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients. Clin Orthop 1988;231:485-91.
21. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnstone RC. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty: a five- to ten-year follow up. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:485-91.
22. Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS. Total hip replacement with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in patients younger than fifty years of age. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:770-4.
23. Amstutz HC, Antoniades JT, Le Duff MJ. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:339-46.
24. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:320-3.
25. Steffen RT, Smith SR, Urban JP, et al. The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1468-74.
26. Murray DW, Little JP, Steffen RT, et al. Femoral neck fractures following resurfacing. Procs IMechE 2007:137-9.
27. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, et al. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1019-24.