Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 453, Issue , 2006, Pages 115-122

  Long, Jason P ^a   Bartel, Donald L ^a,b  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE REMODELING; CANCELLOUS BONE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMUR HEAD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; WEIGHT BEARING; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 33845445598     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238873.09390.6f     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28-39.
2. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1874-1877.
3. Beaule PE, Amstutz HC. Surface arthroplasty of the hip revisited: current indications and surgical technique. In: Sinha RK, ed. Hip replacement: current trends and controversies. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002:261-297.
4. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:87-93.
5. Beaule PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2015-2021.
6. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859-871.
7. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech. 1993;26:969-990.
8. Black J, Hastings GW. Handbook of biomaterial properties: 1st ed. London; New York: Chapman & Hall; 1998.
9. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:954-962.
10. Carter DR, Vasu R, Harris WH. Stress changes in the femoral head due to porous ingrowth surface replacement arthroplasty. J Biomech. 1984;17:737-747.
11. Dalstra M, Huiskes R, Odgaard A, van Erning L. Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomech. 1993;26:523-535.
12. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:177-184.
13. Freeman MA. Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;134:19-24.
14. Gabriel JL, Trousdale RT. Stem fracture after hemiresurfacing for femoral head osteonecrosis. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:96-99.
15. Haddock SM, Yeh OC, Mummaneni PV, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM. Similarity in the fatigue behavior of trabecular bone across site and species. J Biomech. 2004;37:181-187.
16. Huiskes R, Strens PH, van Heck J, Slooff TJ. Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip: finite element analysis of load transmission in the femoral head. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56:474-478.
17. Keller TS, Mao Z, Spengler DM. Young's modulus, bending strength, and tissue physical properties of human compact bone. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:592-603.
18. Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Strain distribution in the proximal human femur: an in vitro comparison in the intact femur and after insertion of reference and experimental femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:295-301.
19. Kleemann RU, Heller MO, Stoeckle U, Taylor WR, Duda GN. THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:767-774.
20. Kotzar GM, Davy DT, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Berilla J, Heiple KG Jr, Brown RH, Burstein AH. Telemeterized in vivo hip joint force data: a report on two patients after total hip surgery. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:621-633.
21. Krause W, Mathis RS, Grimes LW. Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement: S-N, P-N, and P-S-N data. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22(3 Suppl):221-244.
22. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model. J Biomech. 1995;28:1067-1078.
23. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech. 2001;34:569-577.
24. Pattin CA, Caler WE, Carter DR. Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. J Biomech. 1996;29:69-79.
25. Semlitsch M. Metallic implant materials for hip joint endoprostheses designed for cemented and cementless fixation. In: Morscher E, ed. The cementless fixation of hip endoprostheses. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag; 1984:59-70.
26. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:463-464.
27. Shirazi-Adl A, Dammak M, Paiement G. Experimental determination of friction characteristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated metal interface in cementless implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:167-175.
28. Stansfield BW, Nicol AC. Hip joint contact forces in normal subjects and subjects with total hip prostheses: walking and stair and ramp negotiation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17:130-139.
29. Stem E, Duffy G, Blasser K, O'Connor MI. Stem fracture of conserve hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:923-926.
30. Taylor M. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2006;220:289-297.
31. Verdonschot N, Tanck E, Huiskes R. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42:554-559.
32. Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, Higuchi F, Tagawa Y, Inoue A. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:505-511.