Quality of life in different age groups after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

HIP International

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 307-312

  Papavasiliou, A V ^a   Villar, R N ^a  

^a WELLINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Age; Hip resurfacing; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PAIN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL APPROACH; WEIGHT BEARING; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 62349094651     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2008.5066     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry Annual Report 2006. Page 79. Available at: http://www.dhr.dk/annual_report.htm. Last accessed November 10, 2008.
2. Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry 2005. Page 15. Available at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se. Last accessed November 10, 2008.
3. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 3rd Annual Clinical Report. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk. Last accessed November 10, 2008.
4. National Joint Replacement Registry - Australian Orthopaedic Association 2007 Annual Report. Available at: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/ aoanjrr/aoanjrr.jsp. Last accessed November 10, 2008.
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk. Last accessed November 10, 2008.
6. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 436-41.
7. Bowling A. Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1992.
8. Gartland JJ. Orthopaedic clinical research. Deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 1357-64.
9. Rosser RM, Watts VC. The measurement of hospital output. Int J Epidemiol 1972; 1: 361-8.
10. Robinson AH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? A comparison of quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 42-5.
11. Coast J. Reprocessing data to form QALYs. Br Med J 1992; 305: 87-90.
12. Chan CL, Villar RN. Obesity and quality of life after primary hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 78-81.
13. Norman-Taylor FH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996: 78: 74-7.
14. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 28-39.
15. Treacy R, McBryde CW, Pynsent P. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 167-70.
16. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 177-84.
17. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham Hip Resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 324-9.
18. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-Metal hip resurfacing compares favourably with a THA at 2 years follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 123-31.
19. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 592-600.
20. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 1431-8.
21. Shimmin A, Beaulé PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 637-54.
22. World Health Organisation. Highlights on health in the United Kingdom. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/document/e88530.pdf. Last accessed November 10, 2008.
23. Brittan S. Time to index the retirement age. Financial Times 2003 Jan 17.
24. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 320-3.
25. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 463-4.
26. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 187-93, ix.
27. Steffen RT, Foguet PR, Krikler SJ, Gundle R, Beard DJ, Murray DW. Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008 (in press).