Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: The effect of alignment of the femoral component

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1522-1527

  Davis, E T ^a,b   Olsen, M ^a   Zdero, R ^a   Waddell, J P ^a   Schemitsch, E H ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b ROYAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; GEOMETRY; HIP RESURFACING; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VALGUS KNEE; VARUS KNEE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 55549101580     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20068     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
2. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84.
3. Itayem R, Arndt A, McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Lundberg A. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1140-3.
4. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
5. Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1137-42.
6. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:436-41.
7. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:592-600.
8. Keegan GM, Learmonth ID, Case CP. Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patient: a review of current knowledge and future strategies. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:567-73.
9. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1874-7.
10. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418:87-93.
11. Beaulé PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:2015-21.
12. De Smet KA. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:203-13.
13. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-4.
14. Lian YY, Pei FX, Yoo MC, Cheng JQ, Fatou CY. Changes of the bone mineral density in proximal femur following total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of femoral head. J Orthop Res 2008;26:453-9.
15. Long JP, Bartel DL. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system. Clin Orthop 2006;453:115-22.
16. Heiner AD, Brown TD. Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. J Biomech 2001;34:773-81.
17. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 1996;29:525-35.
18. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001;34:859-71.
19. Freeman MA. Total surface replacement hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1978;134:2-4.
20. Clarke IC. Biomechanics: multifactorial design choices: an essential compromise? Orthop Clin North Am 1982;13:681-707.
21. Beaulé PE, Campbell PA, Hoke R, Dorey F. Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a vascular study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:35-9.
22. Radcliffe IA, Taylor M. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 2007;22:780-6.
23. No authors listed. National Joint Replacement Registry, 2007. Australian Orthopaedic Association 2007. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/ aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrreport_2007.pdf (date last accessed 12 August 2008).
24. McMinn D, Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:239-51.
25. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:66-71.
26. Markolf KL, Amstutz HC. Mechanical strength of the femur following resurfacing and conventional total hip replacement procedures. Clin Orthop 1980;147:170-80.
27. Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, Hodgson AJ, Greidanus NV. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop 2007;465:71-9.
28. Duda GN, Heller M, Albinger J, et al. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech 1998;31:841-6.
29. Taylor ME, Tanner KE, Freeman MA, Yettram al. Stress and strain distribution within the intact femur: compression or bending? Med Eng Phys 1996;18:122-31.
30. Cheung G, Zalzal P, Bhandari M, Spelt JK, Papini M. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading. Med Eng Phys 2004;26:93-108.