Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 461-467

  Wik, T S ^a   Ostbyhaug P O ^a   Klaksvik, J ^a   Aamodt, A ^a,b  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; CADAVER; CLIMBING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; SIMULATOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 77649196112     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22592     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement. Annual Report. Adelaide. AOA, 2008. http://www.dmac.adelaide. edu.au/ aoanjrr/publications.jsp?section=reports2009 (date last accessed 16 December 2009).
2. Danish Hip Arthroplasty. Annual Report. Aarhus, 2007.https//www.sundhed.dk/Artikel.aspx?id=20132.1 (date last accessed 16 December 2009).
3. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty. Annual Report. Gothenburg, 2008. http://www.shpr.se/DocumentsReports.aspx (date last accessed 16 December 2009).
4. The Norwegian Arthroplasty. Annual Report. Bergen, 2008. http://www.haukeland.no/nrleng/default.htm (date last accessed 16 December 2009).
5. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84.
6. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, Lardy-Smith P, Murray DW. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a two-year study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:172-6.
7. Itayem R, Arndt A, Nistor L, McMinn D, Lundberg A. Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years: a radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:158-62.
8. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2007;465:63-70.
9. Treacy RBC, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
10. Heilpern GNA, Shah NN, Fordyce MJF. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008,90-B:1137-42.
11. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:436-41.
12. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-onmetal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:66-71.
13. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-4.
14. Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:345-53.
15. Campbell P, Beaule PE, Ebramzasdeh E, et al. A study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 2006;453:35-46.
16. Shimmin A, Beaule PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:637-54.
17. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418:87-93.
18. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1874-7.
19. Hayaishi Y, Miki H, Nishii T, et al. Proximal femoral bone mineral density after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty and after standard stem-type cementless total hip arthroplasty, both having similar neck preservation and the same articulation type. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:1208-13.
20. Gupta S, New AMR, Taylor M. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:594-602.
21. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:185-9.
22. Harty JA, Devitt B, Harty LC, Molloy M, McGuinness A. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:693-5.
23. Pal B, Gupta S, New AM. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2009;223:471-84.
24. Long JP, Santner TJ, Bartel DL. Hip resurfacing increases bone strains associated with short-term femoral neck fracture. J Orthop Res 2009;27:1319-25.
25. Ganapathi M, Evans S, Roberts P. Strain pattern following surface replacement of the hip. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2008;222:13-18.
26. Taylor M. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:289-97.
27. Little JP, Taddei F, Viceconti M, Murray DW, Gill HS. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007;22:440-8.
28. Cristofolini L, Juszcyk M, Taddei F, et al. Stress shielding and stress concentration of contemporary epiphyseal hip prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2009;223:27-43.
29. Vail TP, Glisson RR, Dominguez DE, Kitaoka K, Ottaviano D. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:1951-60.
30. Aamodt A, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, et al. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems: an experimental study in human femora. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:921-9.
31. McLeish RD, Charnley J. Abduction forces in the one-legged stance. J Biomech 1970;3:191-209.
32. Hoffman K. An introduction to measurements using strain gauges. Darmstadt: Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH, 1989.
33. Miles AW TK, Tanner KE, eds. Strain measurement in biomechanics. First ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1992:191.
34. Pattin CA, Caler WE, Carter DR. Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. J Biomech 1996;29:69-79.
35. Deuel CR, Jamali AA, Stover SM, Hazelwood AJ. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:124-30.
36. Ostbyhaug PO, Klaksvig J, Romundstad P, Aamodt A. An in vitro study of the strain distribution in human femora with anatomical and customised femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:676-82.
37. Anglin C, Masri BA, Tonetti J, Hodgson AJ, Greidanus NV. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop 2007;465:71-9.
38. Nunley RM, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop 2009;467:56-65.
39. Radcliffe IA, Taylor M. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007;22:780-6.
40. Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1522-7.
41. Richards CJ, Giannitsios D, Huk OL, et al. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:96-101.
42. Cristofolini L. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1997;25:409-83.
43. Duda GN, Heller M, Albinger J, et al. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech 1998;31:841-6.
44. Bergmann G, Deueretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001;34:859-71.
45. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. In vitro stress shielding measurements can be affected by large errors. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:215-19.