Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: What do they tell us?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 351-357

  Corten, Kristoff ^a   MacDonald, Steven J ^a  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE REPLACEMENT ARTHROPLASTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; EQUIPMENT; EUROPE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTER; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

METAL;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; AUSTRALIA; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EUROPE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76249123869     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1157-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. HC Amstutz PE Beaulé FJ Dorey MJ Le Duff PA Campbell TA Gruen 2004 Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 28 39 14711942
2. HC Amstutz PE Beaulé FJ Dorey MJ Le Duff PA Campbell TA Gruen GP Duffy DJ Berry C Rowland ME Cabanela 2001 Primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients < 40 years old J Arthroplasty 16 Suppl 1 140 144
3. HC Amstutz E Dorey PF O'Carroll 1986 THARIES resurfacing arthroplasty Evolution and long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 213 92 114
4. HC Amstutz MJ Le Duff PA Campbell FJ Dorey 2007 The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3- to 9-year follow-up J Arthroplasty 22 481 489 10.1016/j.arth.2006.08.001 17562402 (Pubitemid 46880181)
5. Australian Orthopaedic Association Web site. National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2008. Available at: www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/. Accessed January 6, 2009.
6. DL Back R Dalziel D Young A Shimmin 2005 Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 324 329 10.1302/0301-620X.87B3.15556 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ktFOksQ%3D%3D 15773639 (Pubitemid 40424858)
7. PE Beaulé FJ Dorey 2001 Survivorship analysis of cementless total hip arthroplasty in younger patients [Letter] J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83 1590 1591 11679618
8. PE Beaulé FJ Dorey MJ LeDuff T Gruen HC Amstutz 2004 Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip Clin Orthop Relat Res. 418 87 93 10.1097/00003086-200401000-00015 15043098
9. RB Bourne WJ Maloney GJG Wright 2004 An AOA critical issue the outcome of the outcomes movement J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 633 640 14996894
10. JP Cobb V Kannan W Dandachli F Iranpour KU Brust AJ Hart 2008 Learning how to resurface cam-type femoral heads with acceptable accuracy and precision: the role of computed tomography-based navigation J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 57 64 10.2106/JBJS.H.00606 18676938
11. DK Collis CG Mohler 2002 Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84 586 592 11940619
12. J Daniel PB Pynsent DJ McMinn 2004 Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86 177 184 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14600 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ltlaisg%3D%3D 15046429 (Pubitemid 38386853)
13. G Hallan SA Lie O Furnes LB Engesaeter SE Vollset LI Havelin 2007 Medium- and long-term performance of 11, 516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89 1574 1580 10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.18969 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjis1ehtg%3D%3D 18057355 (Pubitemid 351183406)
14. GN Heilpern NN Shah MJ Fordyce 2008 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 1137 1142 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crntFOltg%3D%3D
15. CB Hing DL Back M Bailey DA Young RE Dalziel AJ Shimmin 2007 The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years: an independent prospective review of the first 230 hips J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89 1431 1438 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19336 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snntlWqsw%3D%3D 17998177 (Pubitemid 350273235)
16. DW Howie D Campbell M McGee BL Cornish 1990 Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty: the results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years J Bone Joint Surg Am. 72 708 714 1:STN:280:DyaK3c3osFagsg%3D%3D 2355032
17. MA Jacobs RN Goytia T Bhargava 2008 Hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 38 44 10.2106/JBJS.H.00684 18676935
18. SP Johnsen HT Sørensen U Lucht K Søballe S Overgaard AB Pedersen 2006 Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short- and long-terms J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88 1303 1308 10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.17399 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rot1Sltw%3D%3D 17012418 (Pubitemid 44613144)
19. JN Katz E Losina J Barrett CB Phillips NN Mahomed RA Lew E Guadagnoli WH Harris R Poss JA Baron 2001 Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83 1622 1629 10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.10487 11701783
20. WC Kim T Grogan HC Amstutz FJ Dorey 1987 Survivorship comparison of THARIES and conventional hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 40 years old Clin Orthop Relat Res. 214 269 277 3791752
21. KT Mâkelä A Eskelinen P Pulkkinen P Paavolainen V Remes 2008 Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 2160 2170
22. H Malchau G Garellick T Eisler J Kärrholm P Herberts 2005 The Swedish hip registry Clin Orthop Relat Res. 441 19 21 10.1097/01.blo.0000193517. 19556.e4 16330981 (Pubitemid 44384200)
23. CW McBryde E Shears JN O'Hara PB Pynsent 2008 Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in developmental dysplasia J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90 708 714 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czntFKiuw%3D%3D 18539662
24. JR McLaughlin KR Lee 2000 Total hip arthroplasty in young patients Clin Orthop Relat Res. 373 153 163 10.1097/00003086-200004000-00019 10810473
25. MA Mont PS Ragland G Etienne TM Seyler TP Schmalzried 2006 Hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 14 454 463 16885477
26. MA Mont TM Seyler SD Ulrich PE Beaulé HS Boyd MJ Grecula VM Goldberg WR Kennedy DR Marker TP Schmalzried EA Sparling T Parker Vail HC Amstutz 2007 Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing Clin Orthop Relat Res. 465 63 70 17891034
27. MM Morlock N Bishop J Zustin M Hahn W Rüther M Amling 2008 Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 89 95 10.2106/JBJS.H.00621 18676942
28. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Fourth Annual Report. Available at: www.njrcentre.org.uk. Accessed January 6, 2009.
29. TC Pollard RP Baker SJ Eastaugh-Waring GC Bannister 2006 Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88 592 600 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283jslChsA%3D%3D
30. TP Schmalzried D Buttman M Grecula HC Amstutz 1994 The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis J Bone Joint Surg Am. 76 677 688 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3jtVCqtA%3D%3D 8175815
31. TP Schmalzried M Silva MA de la Rosa E-S Choi VA Fowble 2005 Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing Clin Orthop Relat Res. 441 200 204 10.1097/01.blo.0000192354.76792.bb 16331003 (Pubitemid 44384221)
32. TM Seyler LP Lai DI Sprinkle WG Ward RH Jinnah 2008 Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 71 80 10.2106/JBJS.H.00697 18676940
33. AJ Shimmin D Back 2005 Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 463 464 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15498 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7mt12ltA%3D%3D 15795193 (Pubitemid 40575766)
34. T Siebel S Maubach MM Morlock 2006 Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations Proc Inst Mech Eng. 220 345 353 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283ksFKrtg%3D%3D
35. P Söderman H Malchau P Herberts R Zügner H Regnér G Garellick 2001 Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Part II: disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register Acta Orthop Scand. 72 113 119 11372940
36. RT Steffen HP Pandit J Palan DJ Beard R Gundle P McLardy-Smith DW Murray HS Gill 2008 The five year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90 436 441 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3hvFOksA%3D%3D 18378915 (Pubitemid 351542858)
37. BN Stulberg KK Trier M Naughton JD Zadzilka 2008 Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 21 26 10.2106/JBJS.H.00718 18676932
38. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2006. Available at: www.jru.orthop.gu.se. Accessed January 6, 2009.
39. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2007. Available at: www.jru.orthop.gu.se. Accessed January 6, 2009.
40. RB Treacy CW McBryde PB Pynsent 2005 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 167 170 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15030 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7gs1elsg%3D%3D 15736736 (Pubitemid 40282567)