Femoral Neck Fractures After Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing. A Prospective Cohort Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2007, Pages 66-71

  Marker, David R ^a   Seyler, Thorsten M ^b   Jinnah, Riyaz H ^b   Delanois, Ronald E ^a   Ulrich, Slif D ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

complications; femoral neck fracture; hip arthroplasty; metal on metal total resurfacing; outcome; risk factors

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBESITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BODY MASS INDEX; BONE CYSTS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34848877212     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Treacy R.B., McBryde C.W., and Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 167
2. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Marker D.R., et al. Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 Suppl 3 (2006) 90
3. Vail T.P., Mina C.A., Yergler J.D., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at2years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 123
4. Amstutz H.C., Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 28
5. Beaule P.E., Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M., et al. Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 54
6. Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., LeDuff M., et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 87
7. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., and McMinn D.J. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 177
8. Shimmin A.J., and Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 463
9. Forrest N., Welch A., Murray A.D., et al. Femoral head viability after Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty: assessment with use of [18F] fluoride positron emission tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 3) (2006) 84
10. Bray G.A. Overweight is risking fate. Definition, classification, prevalence, and risks. Ann N Y Acad Sci 499 (1987) 14
11. Kaplan E., and Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53 (1958) 457
12. Campbell P., Beaule P.E., Ebramzadeh E., et al. The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 35