Sex as a Patient Selection Criterion for Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 198-208

  Amstutz, Harlan C ^a   Wisk, Lauren E ^a   Le Duff, Michel J ^a  

^a ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Female sex; Hip arthroplasty; Metal on metal hybrid resurfacing arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 12; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; WALKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78751571927     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.033     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Hing C., Back D., Shimmin A. Hip resurfacing: indications, results and conclusions. AAOS Instructional Course Lecture 2007, 56:171.
2. Shimmin A., Bare J., Back D. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36:187.
3. Buergi M., Walter W. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 suppl 3):61.
4. Della Valle C., Nunley R., Raterman S., et al. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, [Epub ahead of print-October 24].
5. Jameson S., Langton D., Natu S., et al. The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):50.
6. Bordini B., Stea S., De Clerico M., et al. Factors affecting aseptic loosening of 4750 total hip arthroplasties: multivariate survival analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8. [online publication].
7. Kostamo T., Bourne R., Whittaker J., et al. No difference in gender-specific hip replacement outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, [Epub ahead of print].
8. Mahomed N.N., Barrett J.A., Katz J.N., et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:27.
9. Nercessian O., Joshi R., Martin G., et al. Influence of demographic and technical variables on the incidence of osteolysis in Charnley primary low-friction hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:631.
10. Schmalzried T., Silva M., de la Rosa M., et al. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:200.
11. Amstutz H., Beaulé P., Dorey F., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone and Joint Surg 2004, 86 A:28.
12. Amstutz H., Campbell P., Le Duff M. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone and Joint Surg 2004, 86 A:1874.
13. Mont M., Schmalzried T. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):3.
14. Morlock M., Bishop N., Zustin J., et al. Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):89.
15. Amstutz H., Le Duff M., Campbell P., et al. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3-9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:481.
16. Amstutz H., Le Duff M. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(Suppl 1):36.
17. Le Duff M., Amstutz H., Dorey F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:2705.
18. Amstutz H., Antoniades J., Le Duff M. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type I and II developmental dysplasia. J Bone and Joint Surg Am 2007, 89-2:339.
19. Graves S. Annual Report 2008, Australian Orthopaedic Association-National joint replacement registry, Adelaide.
20. McBryde C., Theivendran K., Thomas A., et al. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:107.
21. Mont M., Seyler T., Ulrich S., et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 465:63.
22. Glyn-Jones S., Pandit H., Kwon Y., et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1566.
23. Pandit H., Glyn-Jones S., McLardy-Smith P., et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:847.
24. Schmalzried T. Metal-metal bearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009, 32. [E-publication].
25. Olsen R., Munk P., Lee M., et al. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 2000, 20-3:699.
26. Amstutz H., Beaulé P., Dorey F., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty-surgical technique. J Bone and Joint Surg 2006, 88 A(Suppl 1 Part 2):234.
27. Campbell P., Takamura K., Lundergan W., et al. Cement technique changes improved hip resurfacing longevity: implant retrieval findings. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2009, 67:146.
28. Beaulé P., Matar W., Poitras P., et al. Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2008, 467-1:84.
29. Bitsch R., Heisel C., Silva M., et al. Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2007, 25:423.
30. Malviya A., Lingard E., Malik A., et al. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. J Arthroplasty 2009, [E-pub ahead of print].
31. De Haan R., Campbell P., Su E., et al. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1158.
32. De Haan R., Pattyn C., Gill H., et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1291.
33. Hart A., Buddhdev P., Winship P., et al. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int 2008, 18:212.
34. Serious health issues at menopause. Menopause 2009, vol. 2009. Society NAM, Mayfield Heights.
35. Cauley J., Robbins J., Chen Z., et al. Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA 2003, 290:1729.
36. Jaglal S., Weller I., Mamdani M., et al. Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong?. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:898.
37. Ahlborg H., Johnell O., Turner C., et al. Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:327.
38. Haynes D., Crotti T., Potter A., et al. The osteoclastogenic molecules RANKL and RANK are associated with periprosthetic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:902.
39. Hofbauer L., Schoppet M. Clinical implications of the osteoprotegerin/RANKL/RANK system for bone and vascular diseases. JAMA 2004, 292:490.
40. Malik M., Bayat A., Jury F., et al. Genetic susceptibility to hip arthroplasty failure-association with the RANK/OPG pathway. Int Orthop 2006, 30:177.
41. Ritchlin C., Schwarz E., O'Keefe R., et al. RANK, RANKL and OPG in inflammatory arthritis and periprosthetic osteolysis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2004, 4:276.
42. Theoleyre S., Wittrant Y., Tat S., et al. The molecular triad OPG/RANK/RANKL: involvement in the orchestration of pathophysiological bone remodeling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2004, 15:457.
43. Veigl D., Niederlová J., Krystůfková O. Periprosthetic osteolysis and its association with RANKL expression. Physiol Res 2007, 56:455.
44. Wada T., Nakashima T., Hiroshi N., et al. RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease. Trends Mol Med 2006, 12:17.
45. Arden N.K., Griffiths G.O., Hart D.J., et al. The association between osteoarthritis and osteoporotic fracture: the Chingford Study. Br J Rheumatol 1996, 35:1299.
46. Cumming R., Klineberg R. Epidemiological study of the relation between arthritis of the hip and hip fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 1993, 52:707.
47. Dequeker J., Johnell O. Osteoarthritis protects against femoral neck fracture: the MEDOS study experience. Bone 1993, 14(Suppl 1):S51.
48. Foss M., Byers P. Bone density, osteoarthrosis of the hip, and fracture of the upper end of the femur. Ann Rheum Dis 1972, 31:259.
49. Holtzman J., Saleh K., Kane R. Effect of baseline functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:1942.
50. Weaver F., Hynes D., Hopkinson W., et al. Preoperative risks and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in the Veterans Health Administration. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:693.