The Influence of Age and Sex on Early Clinical Results After Hip Resurfacing. An Independent Center Analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 50-55

  Jameson, Simon S ^a   Langton, David J ^a   Natu, Sonali ^a   Nargol, Tony V F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

hip resurfacing; metal on metal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP RESURFACING; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVOR;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 49549113141     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler T., et al. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 Suppl (2002) 2
2. Puolakka T.J.S., Jorma K., Pajamäki J., et al. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the register. Acta Orthop Scand 72 (2001) 433
3. Grigoris P., Roberts P., Panousis K., et al. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36 (2005) 125
4. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2002/034 NICE recommends the selective use of metal on metal hip resurfacing. http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=33568 (Accessed 05/09/07)
5. Amstuz H.C., Grigoris P., and Dorey F.J. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci 3 (1998) 169
6. Shimmin A.J., Bare J., and Back D.L. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36 (2005) 187
7. McGrory B.J., Morrey B.F., Cahalan T.D., et al. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77-B (1995) 865
8. Asayama I., Naito M., Fujisawa M., et al. Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 747
9. Treacy R.B.C. To resurface or replace the hip in the under 65-year-old: the case for resurfacing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88 (2006) 349
10. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., and McMin D.J.W. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B (2004) 177
11. Treacy R.B.C., McBryde C.W., and Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B (2005) 167
12. Amstutz H.C., Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 28
13. Pollard T.C.B., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B (2006) 592
14. Siebel T., Maubach S., and Morlock M.M. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implants. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220 (2006) 345
15. Shimmin A.J., and Back D.L. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B (2005) 463
16. Beaulé P., Dorey F.J., LeDuff M., et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418 (2004) 87
17. Ng C.Y., Ballantyne J.A., and Brenkel I.J. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement: a five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 (2007) 868
18. Isaac G.H., Siebel T., Schmalzried T.P., et al. Development rationale for an articular surface replacement: a science-based evolution. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220 (2006) 253
19. Elves M.W., Wilson J.N., Scales J.T., et al. Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements. BMJ 4 (1975) 376
20. Sweetnam R. Metal sensitivity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56-B (1974) 601
21. Jacobs J.J., and Hallab N.J. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: a local effect of metal hypersensitivity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 (2006) 1171
22. Saikko V., Nevalainen J., Revitzer H., et al. Metal release from total hip articulations in vitro: substantial from CoCr, negligible from CoCr/PE and alumina/PE. Acta Orthop Scand 69 (1998) 449
23. Vendittoli A., Mottard S., Roy A.G., et al. Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B (2007) 441
24. Brodner W., Grubl A., Jankovsky R., et al. Cup inclination and serum concentration of cobalt and chromium after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 66
25. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report Adelaide (2006), Australian Orthopaedic Association. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport_2006.pdf Available at: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport_2006.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2008