Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1550-1554

  Lingard, E A ^a   Muthumayandi, K ^a   Holland, J P ^a  

^a FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENDER; HEALTH; HIP RESURFACING SURGERY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 72249114758     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22326     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. No authors listed. NJR. National Joint Registry for England and Wales Fourth Annual Report. 2007. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/ (date last accessed 5 October 2009).
2. Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. The burden of disease and mortality by condition: data, methods, and results for 2001. In: Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, eds. Global burden of disease risk factors. Oxford University Press: New York, 2006:45-93.
3. van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J. The impact of non-traumatic hip and knee disorders on health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1141-1155 (Pubitemid 40685237)
4. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:963-974 (Pubitemid 38619796)
5. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1722-1728 (Pubitemid 30263642)
6. Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, et al. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:3327-3330
7. Wyness L, Vale L, McCormack K, Grant A, Brazzelli M. The effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing: a systematic review of the available evidence published before 2002. BMC Health Serv Res 2004;4:39. (Pubitemid 34763929)
8. Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1137-1142
9. McBryde CW, Revell MP, Thomas AM, Treacy RB, Pynsent PB. The influence of surgical approach on outcome on Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2008;466:920-926
10. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2007;465:63-70.
11. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:436-441 (Pubitemid 351542858)
12. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Roy AG, Girard J. Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:838-839 (Pubitemid 43971151)
13. Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Jin Z. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006;220:95-105.
14. Vale L, Wyness L, McCormack K, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:1-109.
15. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:592-600.
16. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:40-46 (Pubitemid 38057334)
17. Leonard M, Magill M, Kiely P, Khayyat G. Radiographic comparison of cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2007;17:583-586 (Pubitemid 350045117)
18. Gartland JJ. Orthopaedic clinical research: deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70-A:1357-1364
19. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:156-163 (Pubitemid 36418272)
20. Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: a user's guide. London, Ontario 1995.
21. Bellamy N, Buchannan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of the WOMAC: a health status instrument of measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1988;1:95-108.
22. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu FH, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). III: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40-66.
23. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). II: psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247-263
24. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483
25. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score version 2 of the SF-37 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated 2000.
26. Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Daltroy L, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Self-administered patient satisfaction scale for Joint Replacement Arthroplasty. 52nd Annual Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting. 1997.
27. Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, et al. Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1994;37:687-694 (Pubitemid 24145072)
28. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, et al. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2635-2641
29. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Care and Research 2001;45:384-391 (Pubitemid 32738745)
30. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, et al. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:100-108 (Pubitemid 46014052)
31. World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning and disability. Geneva, 2001.
32. Stucki G, Ewert T. How to assess the impact of arthritis on the individual patient: the WHO ICF. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:664-668 (Pubitemid 40559290)
33. Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Bowman DH. Findings of extensive variation in the types of outcome measures used in hip and knee replacement clinical trials: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:876-883
34. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop 2009;467:66-71.
35. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop 2006;453:123-131 (Pubitemid 44900970)