Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1137-1142

  Heilpern, G N A ^a,b   Shah, N N ^a,c   Fordyce, M J F ^a  

^a KENT AND SUSSEX HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEFUROXIME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; CLINICAL STUDY; CONGENITAL HIP DISLOCATION; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS; RADIOLOGY; RATING SCALE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURGEON; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, PSORIATIC; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP DISLOCATION, CONGENITAL; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEONECROSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 53649086525     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20524     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
2. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-9.
3. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84.
4. Malchau P, Herberts P, Soderman P, Oden A. Update and validation of results from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979 - 1998 [abstract]. Procs 67th Annual Meeting American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2000.
5. Dorr LD, Kane TJ 3rd, Conaty JP. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger: a 16-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:453-6.
6. Joshi AB, Porter ML, Trail A, et al. Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75-B:616-23.
7. Amstutz HC, Graff-Radford A, Gruen T, Clarke IC. THARIES surface replacements: a review of the first 100 cases. Clin Orthop 1978;134:87-101.
8. Freeman MA, Cameron HU, Brown GC. Cemented double cup arthroplasty of the hip: a 5 year experience with the ICLH prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1978;134:45-52.
9. Furuya K, Tsuchiya H, Kawachi S. Socket cup arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1978;134:41-4.
10. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:185-9.
11. Silva M, Haeng Lee K, Heisel C, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of a total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:40-6.
12. Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P-A, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:721-6.
13. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent PB. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1996;329(Suppl):89-98.
14. McMinn DW. Development of metal/metal hip resurfacing [abstract]. Hip 2003;13(Suppl 2):41-53.
15. Pollard TCB, Basu C, Ainsworth R, Lai W, Bannister GC. Is the Birmingham hip resurfacing worthwhile? Hip 2003;13:26-8.
16. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:436-41.
17. No authors listed. World Health Organisation. http://www.who.int (date last accessed 23 June 2008).
18. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-4.
19. Cossey AJ, Back DL, Shimmin A, Young D, Spriggins AJ. The non operative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:358-61.
20. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:169-73.
21. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:185-90.
22. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-55.
23. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984;66-A:228-41.
24. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973;55-A:1629-32.
25. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;418:87-93.
26. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
27. Cumming D, Fordyce MJ. Non-operative management of a peri-prosthetic subcapital fracture after metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:1055-6.
28. No authors listed. Guidance on the use of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2002 http://www.nice.org.uk/search/guideancesearchresults.jsp (date last accessed 20 April 2008).
29. Freeman MA. Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head. Clin Orthop 1978;134:19-24.
30. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:187-93.
31. Beaule PE, Lee JL, LeDuff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:2015-21.
32. Dawson J, Jameson-Shortall E, Emerton M, et al. Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgery: a review of 598 cases at 7 years comparing 2 prostheses using revision rates, survival analysis and patient-based measures. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:710-17.
33. No authors listed. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2006. http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se (date last accessed 24 July 2008).
34. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, et al. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1019-24.