Eleven Years of Experience With Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Hip Resurfacing. A Review of 1000 Conserve Plus

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 36-43

  Amstutz, Harlan C ^a   Le Duff, Michel J ^a  

^a ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Conserve Plus; metal on metal hybrid hip resurfacing; survivorship

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FEMUR MALFORMATION; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HIP; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL ON METAL HYBRID HIP RESURFACING; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCORING SYSTEM; SEPSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUBLUXATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BODY MASS INDEX; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 49549093602     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mont M., Ragland P., Etienne G., et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14 (2006) 454
2. Vail T., Mina C., Yergler J., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2006) 453
3. Amstutz H., Beaulé P., Dorey F., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 86 A (2004) 28
4. Beaulé P., Harvey N., Zaragoza E., et al. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 (2007) 9
5. Back D., Dalziel R., Young D., et al. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg 87 B (2005) 324
6. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., and McMinn D. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 86 B (2004) 177
7. De Smet K. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36 (2005) 203
8. Treacy R., McBryde C., and Pynsent P. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 167
9. Vendittoli P., Lavigne M., Roy A., et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int 16 (2006) 873
10. Amstutz H., Thomas B., Jinnah R., et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 66 A (1984) 228
11. Harris W. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 51 A (1969) 737
12. Ware J., Kosinski M., and Keller S. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 (1996) 220
13. Amstutz H., Ball S., Le Duff M., et al. Hip resurfacing for patients under 50 years of age. Results of 350 Conserve Plus with a 2-9 year follow-up. Clin Orthop 460 (2007) 159
14. Amstutz H., Beaulé P., Dorey F., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty-Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg 88 A (2006) 234
15. Amstutz H. Surgical technique. In: Amstutz H.C. (Ed). Hip Resurfacing: Principles, Indications, Technique and Results (2008), Elsevier In Press, Philadelphia
16. Amstutz H., Le Duff M., Campbell P., et al. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3-9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 481
17. Ware J., Kosinski M., and Keller S. SF-12: How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales (1998), Quality Metric Inc., Lincoln (RI)
18. Ball S., Le Duff M., and Amstutz H. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 735
19. Beaulé P., Dorey F., and Le Duff M. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A (2003) 2288
20. Howie D.W., Campbell D., McGee M., et al. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg 72 (1990) 708
21. Kim Y. The results of a proximally-coated cementless femoral component in total hip replacement: A five- to 12-year follow-up. Bone Joint Surg Br 90 (2008) 299
22. Chen C., Xenos J., McAuley J., et al. Second-generation porous-coated cementless total hip arthroplasties have high survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451 (2006) 121
23. Lilikakis A., Vowler S., and Villar R. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 36 (2005) 215
24. Shimmin A. Hip resurfacing "the Australian experience". Instructional course lecture-AAOS (2007)
25. Kim W.C., Grogan T., Amstutz H.C., et al. Survivorship comparison of THARIES and conventional hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 40 years old. Clin Orthop 214 (1987) 269
26. Dorey F.J., and Amstutz H.C. The need to account for patient activity when evaluating the results of total hip arthroplasty with survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 84-A (2002) 709
27. Le Duff M., Amstutz H., and Dorey F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 2705
28. Beaulé P., Matar W., Poitras P., et al. The Otto Aufranc award. Cement penetration in hip resurfacing: femoral component design and cementation technique. Clin Orthop (2008) [in press]
29. Campbell P., Beaulé P., Ebramzadeh E., et al. A study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 453 (2006) 35