Metacognition and performance in the accounting classroom

Issues in Accounting Education

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 339-367

  Schleifer, Lydia L F ^a   Dull, Richard B ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting; Education; Learning; Metacognition; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649463956     PISSN: 07393172     EISSN: 15587983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/iace.2009.24.3.339     Document Type: Article

References (173)

1. Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). 1990. Objectives of education for accountants: Position statement number one. Issues in Accounting Education (Fall): 307-312.
2. Aguinis, H., J. C. Beaty, R. J. Boik, and C. A. Pierce. 2005. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (1): 94-107.
3. Almer, E. D., K. Jones, and C. L. Moeckel. 1998. The impact of one-minute papers on learning an introductory accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (3): 485-497.
4. American Accounting Association (AAA), Committee on the Future, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (The Bedford Committee). 1986. Future accounting education: Preparing for the expanding profession. Issues in Accounting Education (Spring): 168-195.
5. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2000. Core Competency Framework for Entry into the Accounting Profession. Available at: http://www.aicpa.org/edu/corecomp.htm.
6. Ammons, J. L., and S. K. Mills. 2005. Course-embedded assessments for evaluating cross-functional integration and improving the teaching-learning process. Issues in Accounting Education 20 (1): 1-19.
7. Ashbaugh, H., K. M. Johnstone, and T. D. Warfield. 2002. Outcome assessment of a writing-skill improvement initiative: Results and methodological implications. Issues in Accounting Education 17 (2): 123-148.
8. Baird, J. E., R. C. Zelin, II, and L. A. Ruggle. 1998. Experimental evidence on the benefits of using "writing to learn" activities in accounting courses. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (2): 259-276.
9. Baker, J. M. C., and J. Dunlosky. 2006. Does momentary accessibility influence metacomprehension judgments? The influence of study-judgment lags on accessibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 (1): 60-65.
10. Bauer, D. J., and P. J. Curran. 2005. Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research 40 (3): 373-400.
11. Berardi-Colleta, B., L. S. Buyer, and R. Dominowski. 1995. Metacognition and problem-solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1): 205-223.
12. Boekaerts, M. 1997. Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 7: 161-186.
13. Booth, P., P. Luckett, and R. Mladenovic. 1999. The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education 8 (4): 277-300.
14. Brown, A. L. 1978. Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol. 1, edited by R. Glaser, 77-165. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Brown, N. 2005. Meta programmes for identifying thinking preferences and their impact on accounting students' educational experience. Journal of Accounting Education 23 (4): 232-247.
16. Bruning, R. H., G. J. Schraw, and R. R. Ronning. 1995. Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill (Prentice Hall).
17. Bryant, S. M., and J. E. Hunton. 2000. The use of technology in the delivery of instruction: Implications for accounting education researchers. Issues in Accounting Education 15 (1): 129-162.
18. Byrne, M., B. Flood, and P. Willis. 2004. Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST) using accounting students in the USA and Ireland: A research note. Accounting Education 13 (4): 449-459.
19. Carr, M., and B. Biddlecomb. 1998. Metacognition in mathematics from a constructivist perspective. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 69-91. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Case, J., R. Gunstone, and A. Lewis. 2001. Students' metacognitive development in an innovative second-year chemical engineering course. Research in Science Education 31 (3): 313-335.
21. Case, J., R. Gunstone, and A. Lewis. 2002. Metacognitive development as a shift in approach to learning: An indepth study. Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 459-470.
22. Case, J., R. Gunstone, and A. Lewis. 2006. Metacognitive development: A view beyond cognition. Research in Science Education 36 (1/2): 51-67.
23. Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Conner, L., and R. Gunstone. 2004. Conscious knowledge of learning: Accessing learning strategies in a final year high school biology class. International Journal of Science Education 26 (12): 1427-1443.
25. Coutinho, S., K. Wiemer-Hastings, J. J. Skowronski, and M. A. Britt. 2005. Metacognition, need for cognition and use of explanations during ongoing learning and problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences 15 (4): 321-337.
26. Crandall, D., and F. Phillips. 2002. Using hypertext in instructional material: Helping students link accounting concept knowledge to case applications. Issues in Accounting Education 17 (2): 163-183.
27. Davidson, J. E., and R. J. Sternberg. 1998. Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 47-68. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Davidson, R. A. 2002. Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education 20 (1): 29-44.
29. De Carvalho Filho, M. K., and M. Yuzawa. 2001. The effects of social cues on confidence judgments mediated by knowledge and regulation of cognition. Journal of Experimental Education 69 (4): 325-344.
30. De Lange, P., and F. Mavondo. 2004. Gender and motivational differences in approaches to learning by a cohort of open learning students. Accounting Education 13 (4): 431-448.
31. Delclos, V. R., and C. Harrington. 1991. Effects of strategy monitoring and proactive instruction on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 35-42.
32. Dominowski, R. L. 1998. Verbalization and problem solving. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 25-45. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Doran, B., M. Bouillon, and C. Smith. 1991. Determinants of student performance in accounting principles I and II. Issues in Accounting Education 6: 74-84.
34. Duff, A. 1999. Access policy and approaches to learning. Accounting Education: An International Journal 8 (2): 99-110.
35. Duff, A. 2004. Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: The role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education 13 (4): 409-430.
36. Duff, A, E. Boyle, K. Dunleavy, and J. Ferguson. 2004. The relationship between personality, approach to learning, and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences 36 (8): 1907-1920.
37. Duff, A, and S. McKinstry. 2007. Students' approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education 22 (2): 183-214.
38. Dunlosky, J., and T. O. Nelson. 1997. Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language 36 (1): 34-49.
39. Dunlosky, J., and C. Hertzog. 1998. Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 249-275. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Dunlosky, J., and K. W. Thiede. 2004. Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition 32 (5): 779-788.
41. Eisenberger, R. 1992. Learned industriousness. Psychological Review 99: 248-267.
42. El-Hindi, A. E. 1997. Connecting reading and writing: College learners' metacognitive awareness. Journal of Developmental Education 21: 10-16.
43. English, L., P. Luckett, and R. Mladenovic. 2004. Encouraging a deep approach to learning through curriculum design. Accounting Education 13 (4): 461-488.
44. Finn, B., and J. Metcalfe. 2007. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 (1): 238-244.
45. Flavell, J. 1976. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In The Nature of Intelligence, edited by L. Resnick. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Gainen, J., and P. Locatelli. 1995. Assessment for the New Curriculum: A Guide for Professional Accounting Programs. Accounting Education Series, No. 11. Sarasota, FL: Accounting Education Change Commission and American Accounting Association.
47. Georghiades, P. 2004. From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education 26 (3): 365-383.
48. Gist, W., H. Goedde, and B. Ward. 1996. The influence of mathematical skills and other factors on minority student performance in principles of accounting. Issues in Accounting Education 11: 49-59.
49. Grimes, P. W. 2002. The overconfident principles of economics student: An examination of a metacognitive skill. Journal of Economic Education 33 (1): 15-30.
50. Hacker, D. J. 1998a. Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 165-192. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Hacker, D. J. 1998b. Definitions and empirical foundations. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 1-23. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Hacker, D. J., L. Bol, and D. D. Horgan. 2000. Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 160-170.
53. Halabi, A. K., J. E. Tuovinen, and A. A. Farley. 2005. Empirical evidence on the relative efficiency of worked examples versus problem-solving exercises in accounting principles instruction. Issues in Accounting Education 20 (1): 21-32.
54. Hall, M., A. Ramsay, and J. Raven. 2004. Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education 13 (4): 489-505.
55. Haller, E. P., D. A. Child, and H. J. Walberg. 1998. Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of "metacognitive" studies. Educational Researcher 17 (9): 5-8.
56. Halpern, D. F. 1998. Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist 53 (4): 449-455.
57. Hamachek, A. 1995. Coping with College: A Guide for Academic Success. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58. Hattie, J., J. Biggs, and N. Purdie. 1996. Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 66: 99-136.
59. Helleloid, R. T. 1989. Providing answers to self-study questions: An experimental investigation of possible effects. Issues in Accounting Education 4 (1): 94-108.
60. Hermanson, D. 1994. The effect of self-generated elaboration on students' recall of tax and accounting material: Further evidence. Issues in Accounting Education (Fall): 301-318.
61. Hertzog, C., J. Dunlosky, and A. E. Robinson. 2003. Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 (1): 22-34.
62. Hwang, N. R., G. Lui, and M. Y. J. W. Tong. 2005. An empirical test of cooperative learning in a passive learning environment. Issues in Accounting Education 20 (2): 151-65.
63. Jackson, N. 2004. Developing the concept of metalearning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (4): 391-403.
64. Jacobs, J. E., and S. G. Paris. 1987. Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist 22 (3/4): 255-278.
65. Jang, Y., and T. O. Nelson. 2005. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology 134 (3): 308-326.
66. Jones, C., and T. Hassall. 1997. Approaches to learning of first-year accounting students: Some empirical evidence. In Improving Student Learning through Course Design, edited by G. Gibbs, and C. Rust, 431-438. Oxford, U.K.: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
67. Jones, J. P., and K. T. Fields. 2001. The role of supplemental instruction in the first accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education 16 (4): 531-547.
68. Kealey, B. T., J. Holland, and M. Watson. 2005. Preliminary evidence on the association between critical thinking and performance in principles of accounting. Issues in Accounting Education 20 (1): 33-49.
69. Kelemen, W. L., and C. A. Weaver. 1997. Enhanced memory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (6): 1394-1409.
70. Kelemen, W. L. 2000. Metamemory cues and monitoring accuracy: Judging what you know and what you will know. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (4): 800-810.
71. Khan, T. M., and K. Brown. 2000. Model-based training of situated skills. British Journal of Educational Technology 31 (2): 171-179.
72. King, A. 1991. Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 307-317.
73. Kitsantas, A. 2002. Test preparation and performance: A self-regulatory analysis. Journal of Experimental Education 70 (2): 101-113.
74. Koriat, A. 1997. Monitoring one's own knowledge during studying: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 (4): 349-370.
75. Kornell, N., and J. Metcalfe. 2006. Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (3): 609-622.
76. Kramarski, B., Z. R. Mevarech, and A. Lieberman. 2001. Effects of multilevel versus unilevel metacognitive training on mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Research 94 (5): 292-300.
77. Kramarski, B., and M. Gutman. 2006. How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical elearning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 (1): 24-33.
78. Kramarski, B., and N. Mizrachi. 2006a. Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research 99 (4): 218-230.
79. Kramarski, B., and N. Mizrachi. 2006b. Online interactions in a mathematical classroom. Educational Media International 43 (1): 43-50.
80. Krettenauer, T., and D. Eichler. 2006. Adolescents' self-attributed moral emotions following a moral transgression: Relations with delinquency, confidence in moral judgment, and age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24 (3): 489-506.
81. Lancaster, K. A. S., and C. A. Strand. 2001. Using the team-learning model in a managerial accounting class: An experiment in cooperative learning. Issues in Accounting Education 16 (4): 549-567.
82. Lavelle, E., and N. Zuercher. 2001. The writing approaches of university students. Higher Education 42 (3): 373-391.
83. Lin-Miao, L., and K. M. Zabrucky. 1998. Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 23 (4): 345-391.
84. Lipe, M. 1989. Further evidence on the performance of female versus male accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education 4: 144-152.
85. Lucas, U., and R. Mladenovic. 2004. Approaches to learning in accounting education. Accounting Education 13 (4): 399-407.
86. Lucas, U., and J. Meyer. 2004. Supporting student awareness: Understanding student preconceptions of their subject matter within introductory courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (4): 459-471.
87. Lucas, U., and J. Meyer. 2005. Towards a mapping of the student world: The identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting. British Accounting Review 37 (2): 177-204.
88. MacCallum, R. C., and C. M. Mar. 1995. Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin 118 (3): 405-421.
89. Maclure, S., and P. Davies. 1991. Learning to Think: Thinking to Learn. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
90. Maki, R. H. 1998. Test predictions over text material. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 117-144. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
91. Maki, R. H. 1999. The roles of competition, target accessibility, and cue familiarity in metamemory for word pairs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 (4): 1011-1023.
92. McClelland, G. H., and C. M. Judd. 1993. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin 114 (2): 376-390.
93. Metcalfe, J. 2002. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131 (3): 349-363.
94. Metcalfe, J., and N. Kornell. 2003. The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (4): 530-542.
95. Metcalfe, J., and N. Kornell. 2005. A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language 52 (4): 463-477.
96. Mevarech, Z. R., and B. Kramarski. 1997. IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal 34: 365-394.
97. Mevarech, Z. R. 1999. Effects of metacognitive training embedded in cooperative settings on mathematical problem solving. The Journal of Educational Research 92 (4): 195-205.
98. Mevarech, Z. R., and B. Kramarski. 2003. The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 449-471.
99. Meyer, J. 2004. An introduction to the RoLI™. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (4): 491-497.
100. Mokhtari, K., and C. A. Reichard. 2002. Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2): 249-259.
101. Moore, D., K. Zabrucky, and N. E. Commander. 1997. Validation of the metacomprehension scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22: 457-471.
102. Mutchler, J., J. Turner, and D. Williams. 1987. The performance of female versus male accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education 4: 1103-1111.
103. Nelson, T. O., L. Narens, and J. Dunlosky. 2004. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods 9 (1): 53-69.
104. Nietfeld, J. L., L. Cao, and J. W. Osborne. 2005. Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. Journal of Experimental Education 74 (1): 7-28.
105. Nunally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
106. O'Connor, T. J., and L. V. Ruchala. 1998. A model for small-group writing labs in an accounting curriculum. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (1): 93-111.
107. Otani, H., and R. L. Widner, Jr. 2005. Metacognition: New issues and approaches. Journal of General Psychology 132 (4): 329-334.
108. Otero, J. 1998. Influence of knowledge activation and context on comprehension monitoring of science texts. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 145-164. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
109. Paver, B., and E. Gammie. 2005. Constructed gender, approach to learning and academic performance. Accounting Education 14 (4): 427-444.
110. Phillips, F. 1998. Accounting students' beliefs about knowledge: Associating performance with underlying belief dimensions. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (1): 113-126.
111. Phillips, F. 2001. A research note on accounting students' epistemological beliefs, study strategies, and unstructured problem-solving performance. Issues in Accounting Education 16 (1): 21-39.
112. Phillips, F, and G. Vaidyanathan. 2004. Should case materials precede or follow lectures? Issues in Accounting Education 19 (3): 305-319.
113. Pintrich, P. R. 2000a. Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (3): 544-555.
114. Pintrich, P. R. 2000b. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 451-502. San Diego, CA: Academic.
115. Pintrich, P. R. 2002. The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice 41 (4): 220-226.
116. Preacher, K. J., P. J. Curran, and D. J. Bauer. 2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 31 (4): 437-448.
117. Pressley, M., D. L. Forrest-Pressley, D. J. Elliot-Faust, and G. E. Miller. 1985. Children's use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can't be taught. Cognitive Learning and Memory in Children, edited by M. Pressley and C. J. Brainerd, 1-47, New York: Springer-Verlag.
118. Pressley, M., S. van Etten, L. Yokoi, G. Freebern, and P. van Meter. 1998. The metacognition of college studentship: A grounded theory approach. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 347-366. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
119. Puncochar, J. M., and P. W. Fox. 2004. Confidence in individual and group decision-making: When "two heads" are worse than one. Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (3): 582-591.
120. Rabinowitz, M., K. Freeman, and S. Cohen. 1993. Use and maintenance of strategies: The influence of accessibility to knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 211-218.
121. Rawson, K. A., and J. Dunlosky. 2002. Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (1): 69-80.
122. Ross, M., S. Green, J. Salisbury-Glennon, and N. Tollefson. 2006. College students' study strategies as a function of testing: An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation. Innovative Higher Education 30 (5): 361-375.
123. Schraw, G. 1994. The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19: 143-154.
124. Schraw, G, and R. S. Dennison. 1994. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19: 460-475.
125. Schraw, G, M. E. Dunkle, L. D. Bendixen, and T. D. Roedel. 1995. Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology 87 (3): 433-444.
126. Schraw, G, and D. Moshman. 1995. Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review 7 (4): 351-371.
127. Schraw, G. 1997. The effect of generalized metacognitive knowledge on test performance and confidence judgments. Journal of Experimental Education 65 (2): 135-146.
128. Schraw, G. 1998. Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26 (1-2): 113-125.
129. Schraw, G, and J. Nietfeld. 1998. A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (2): 236-248.
130. Schraw, G, and G. M. Sinatra. 2004. Epistemological development and its impact on cognition in academic domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (2): 95-102.
131. Serra, M. J., and J. Dunlosky. 2005. Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-withpractice effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (6): 1258-1266.
132. Severiens, S. E., and G. T. M. ten Dam. 1994. Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education 27 (4): 487-501.
133. Shaftel, J., and T. L. Shaftel. 2005. The influence of effective teaching in accounting on student attitudes, behavior, and performance. Issues in Accounting Education 20 (3): 231-246.
134. Sharma, P., and M. Hannafin. 2004. Scaffolding critical thinking in an online course: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research 31 (2): 181-208.
135. Sigler, E. A., and M. K. Tallent-Runnels. 2006. Examining the validity of scores from an instrument designed to measure metacognition of problem solving. Journal of General Psychology 133 (3): 257-276.
136. Sitko, B. M. 1998. Knowing how to write: Metacognition and writing instruction. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 93-115. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
137. Smagorinsky, P. 1991. The writer's knowledge and the writing process: A protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English 25 (3): 339-364.
138. Smith, P. A. 2001. Understanding self-regulated learning and its implications for accounting educators and researchers. Issues in Accounting Education 16 (4): 663-700.
139. Son, L. K., and J. Metcalfe. 2000. Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (1): 204-221.
140. Son, L. K., 2004. Spacing one's study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (3): 601-604.
141. Sperling, R. A., B. C. Howard, R. Staley, and N. DuBois. 2004. Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation 10 (2): 117-139.
142. Stone, D. N., V. Arunachalam, and J. S. Chandler. 1996. An empirical investigation of knowledge, skill, self-efficacy and computer anxiety in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education 11 (2): 345-377.
143. Swanson, H. L. 1990. Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 473-488.
144. Tabachnik, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
145. Taraban, R., M. Kerr, and K. Rynearson. 2004. Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students' metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology 25 (2): 67-81.
146. Thiede, K. W., and J. Dunlosky. 1994. Delaying students' metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (2): 290-302.
147. Thiede, K. W., and J. Dunlosky. 1999. Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Educational Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 (4): 1024-1037.
148. Thiede, K. W., and M. C. M. Anderson. 2003. Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28 (2): 129-160.
149. Thiede, K. W., M. C. M. Anderson, and D. Therriault. 2003. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (1): 66-73.
150. Thiede, K. W., J. Dunlosky, and T. D. Griffin. 2005. Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (6): 1267-1280.
151. Tyson, T. 1989. Grade performance in introductory accounting courses: Why female students outperform males. Issues in Accounting Education 4: 153-160.
152. Vadhan, V., and P. Stander. 1994. Metacognitive ability and test performance among college students. The Journal of Psychology 128 (3): 307-309.
153. Van Etten, S., G. Freebern, and M. Pressley. 1997. College students' beliefs about exam preparation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22 (2): 192-212.
154. Van Etten, S., M. Pressley, and G. Freebern. 1998. An interview study of college freshmen's beliefs about their academic motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education 13 (1): 159-194.
155. Van Meter, P., L. Yokoi, and M. Pressley. 1994. College students' theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (3): 323-338.
156. Veenman, M. C. J., and J. Verheij. 2001. Technical students' metacognitive skills relating general versus specific metacognitive skills to study success. Learning and Individual Differences 13 (3): 259-272.
157. Veenman, M. C. J., and M. A. Spaans. 2005. Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences 15 (2): 159-176.
158. Vernon, D., and M. Usher. 2003. Dynamics of metacognitive judgments: Pre- and post-retrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 (3): 339-346.
159. Vukman, K. B. 2005. Developmental differences in metacognition and their connections with cognitive development in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development 12 (4): 211-221.
160. White, B., and J. Frederiksen. 2005. A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educational Psychologist 40 (4): 211-223.
161. Wiley, J., T. D. Griffin, and K. W. Thiede. 2005. Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. Journal of General Psychology 132 (4): 408-428.
162. Winne, P. H. 1995a. Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 30 (4): 173-187.
163. Winne, P. H. 1995b. Self-regulation is ubiquitous but its forms vary with knowledge. Educational Psychologist 30 (4): 327-353.
164. Winne, P. H, and A. F. Hadwin. 1998. Studying as self-regulated learning. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 277-304. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
165. Wooten, T. C. 1998. Factors influencing student learning in introductory accounting classes: A comparison of traditional and nontraditional students. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (2): 357-374.
166. Yore, L. D., and D. F. Treagust. 2006. Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-Empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education 28 (2/3): 291-314.
167. Zellermayer, M., G. Salomon, T. Globerson, and H. Givon. 1991. Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner. American Educational Research Journal 28 (2): 373-391.
168. Zimmerman, B. J. 1986. Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology 16: 307-313.
169. Zimmerman, B. J., and A. Kitsantas. 1997. Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 29-36.
170. Zimmerman, B. J., and A. Kitsantas. 1999. Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome selfregulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 241-250.
171. Zimmerman, B. J. 2001. Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. 2nd edition. Edited by B. J. Zimmerman, and D. H. Schunk, 1-37. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
172. Zimmerman, B. J, and D. H. Schunk. 2001. Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. 2nd edition. Edited by B. J. Zimmerman, and D. H. Schunk, 289-307. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
173. Zimmerman, B. J, and A. Kitsantas. 2002. Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (4): 660-668.